| Literature DB >> 29739939 |
Kyle Frohna1,2, Tejas Deshpande3, John Harter3, Wei Peng4, Bradford A Barker5,6, Jeffrey B Neaton5,6,7, Steven G Louie5,6, Osman M Bakr4, David Hsieh8, Marco Bernardi9.
Abstract
Methylammonium lead iodide perovskite (Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29739939 PMCID: PMC5940805 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04212-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Space groups and corresponding point groups for tetragonal MAPbI3
| Bulk space group | Point group | Electric dipole SHG allowed? |
|---|---|---|
| 4/ | No | |
| Yes | ||
| 4 | Yes |
Proposed tetragonal MAPbI3 space groups, their corresponding surface and bulk point groups and whether the point group allows ED SHG
Fig. 1SHG rotational anisotropy experiments. Polar plots of the SHG-RA data (blue dots) from the (100) surface of MAPbI3, where each panel shows results for a different set of incident and outgoing polarizations. The radial direction represents the normalized magnitude of the SHG intensity and the azimuthal angle ϕ the orientation of the light scattering plane relative to the tetragonal a-axis. The expected electric-dipole SHG radiation patterns from the bulk of a I4cm crystal (black) and best fits of the data to electric-dipole SHG radiation patterns from the surface of a I4/mcm crystal (red) are superposed on top of the data. In the latter case, SHG is forbidden by symmetry in Sin−Sout geometry
Fig. 2Structural relaxation in DFT. Lattice parameters (labelled a, b, c) as a function of relaxation step for cubic (a) and tetragonal (b) MAPbI3 structures. The out-of-plane lattice parameter is denoted as c in the tetragonal structure. The relaxation results in both structures becoming orthorhombic, as seen by the different values of the three lattice parameters at the end of the relaxation. The cubic (c) and tetragonal (d) structures obtained after full relaxation without symmetry constraints exhibit considerable distortions of the PbI framework. The MA-relaxed cubic (e) and tetragonal (f) structures with symmetry consistent with experiment are also shown. All structures consist of 4-formula-unit supercells, and the atoms are represented with spheres: Pb is grey, I is purple, C is brown, N is blue, and H is pink
Fig. 3Structural effects on the bandstructure of MAPbI3. Comparisons between the bandstructures of fully relaxed (blue) and MA-relaxed (red) MAPbI3 structures. In a, b, the bandstructures are shown for single-formula-unit cubic structures with the MA ions aligned in the [100] direction, computed within the LDA (a) and HSE (b) approximations of DFT. c Bandstructures for a 4-formula-unit tetragonal supercell. The Rashba splitting, which is magnified in the right panel insets, is in all cases much greater in the fully relaxed structures due to the large PbI framework distortions that break inversion symmetry. The -path labeling of the tetragonal cell is taken from the ref. [65]
Computed Rashba parameters
| CB (cubic) | VB (cubic) | CB (tetragonal) | VB (tetragonal) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.16 ± 0.11 | 0.13 ± 0.11 | 0.45 ± 0.21 | 0.40 ± 0.23 | |
| [110] (Γ | 0.17 ± 0.14 | 0.18 ± 0.11 | 0.47 ± 0.21 | 0.40 ± 0.17 |
| [111] (Γ | 0.16 ± 0.12 | 0.15 ± 0.13 | 0.45 ± 0.23 | 0.39 ± 0.21 |
| [001] (Γ | − | − | 0.23 ± 0.19 | 0.17 ± 0.18 |
Rashba parameters (α) in units of eV Å computed along different high-symmetry directions for both cubic and tetragonal MA-relaxed structures. The mean α values for 10 cubic and 10 tetragonal structures with random MA orientation are given, together with the associated standard deviations. The Rashba coefficient in the direction is an average of the coefficients computed along the [100], [010] and [001] directions. The directions refer to a 4-formula-unit simulation cell with the band edges at the Γ point of the Brillouin zone. CB is the conduction band, and VB the valence band
Fig. 4Carrier effective masses. Effective masses of electrons and holes in the cubic (red) and tetragonal (blue) MAPbI3 phases versus the band gap, shown for 10 structures (in each phase) that differ only for their MA random alignment. The dotted line given for comparison is the electron effective mass of GaAs. The LDA band gaps were shifted by ~1.2 eV to match the experimental gap