J M A Alcantara1, G Sanchez-Delgado2, B Martinez-Tellez3, E Merchan-Ramirez2, I Labayen4, J R Ruiz2. 1. PROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity" Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Ctra. de Alfacar s/n C.P, 18071, Spain. Electronic address: alcantarajma@ugr.es. 2. PROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity" Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Ctra. de Alfacar s/n C.P, 18071, Spain. 3. PROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity" Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Ctra. de Alfacar s/n C.P, 18071, Spain; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, and Einthoven Laboratory for Experimental Vascular Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, Leiden, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarra, Avda. Barañain s/n, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Achieving high inter-day reliability is a key factor to analyze the magnitude of change in RMR, for instance after an intervention. The aims of this study were: i) to determine the congruent validity of RMR and respiratory quotient (RQ) with two breath by breath commercially available metabolic carts [CCM Express (CCM) and Ultima CardiO2 (MGU)]; and ii) to analyze the inter-day reliability of RMR and RQ measurements. METHODS & RESULTS: Seventeen young adults participated in the study. RMR measurements were performed during two consecutive 30-min periods, on two consecutive days with both metabolic carts. The 5-min period that met the steady state criteria [Coefficient of variance (CV) < 10% for VO2, VCO2, and VE, and CV<5% for RQ] and with the lowest CV average was included in further analysis. RMR values were higher with the MGU than with the CCM on both days (two-way ANOVA, P = 0.021), however, no differences were found on RQ values obtained by both metabolic carts (P = 0.642). Absolute inter-day RMR differences obtained with the MGU were higher than those obtained with the CCM (219 ± 185 vs. 158 ± 154 kcal/day, respectively, P = 0.002; 18.3 ± 17.2% vs. 13.5 ± 15.3%, respectively, P = 0.046). We observed a significant positive association of absolute inter-day differences in RMR obtained with both metabolic carts (β = 0.717; R2 = 0.743; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CCM metabolic cart provides lower RMR values and seems more reliable than the MGU in our sample of young adults. Our findings also suggest that a great part of inter-day variability is explained by the individuals.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Achieving high inter-day reliability is a key factor to analyze the magnitude of change in RMR, for instance after an intervention. The aims of this study were: i) to determine the congruent validity of RMR and respiratory quotient (RQ) with two breath by breath commercially available metabolic carts [CCM Express (CCM) and Ultima CardiO2 (MGU)]; and ii) to analyze the inter-day reliability of RMR and RQ measurements. METHODS & RESULTS: Seventeen young adults participated in the study. RMR measurements were performed during two consecutive 30-min periods, on two consecutive days with both metabolic carts. The 5-min period that met the steady state criteria [Coefficient of variance (CV) < 10% for VO2, VCO2, and VE, and CV<5% for RQ] and with the lowest CV average was included in further analysis. RMR values were higher with the MGU than with the CCM on both days (two-way ANOVA, P = 0.021), however, no differences were found on RQ values obtained by both metabolic carts (P = 0.642). Absolute inter-day RMR differences obtained with the MGU were higher than those obtained with the CCM (219 ± 185 vs. 158 ± 154 kcal/day, respectively, P = 0.002; 18.3 ± 17.2% vs. 13.5 ± 15.3%, respectively, P = 0.046). We observed a significant positive association of absolute inter-day differences in RMR obtained with both metabolic carts (β = 0.717; R2 = 0.743; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CCM metabolic cart provides lower RMR values and seems more reliable than the MGU in our sample of young adults. Our findings also suggest that a great part of inter-day variability is explained by the individuals.
Authors: Juan M A Alcantara; Guillermo Sanchez-Delgado; Lucas Jurado-Fasoli; Jose E Galgani; Idoia Labayen; Jonatan R Ruiz Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2022-08-25 Impact factor: 4.865
Authors: Guillermo Sanchez-Delgado; Borja Martinez-Tellez; Yolanda Garcia-Rivero; Juan M A Alcantara; Francisco M Acosta; Francisco J Amaro-Gahete; Jose M Llamas-Elvira; Jonatan R Ruiz Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Juan M A Alcantara; Guillermo Sanchez-Delgado; Francisco J Amaro-Gahete; Jose E Galgani; Jonatan R Ruiz Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Guillermo Sanchez-Delgado; Francisco M Acosta; Borja Martinez-Tellez; Graham Finlayson; Catherine Gibbons; Idoia Labayen; Jose M Llamas-Elvira; Angel Gil; John E Blundell; Jonatan R Ruiz Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 7.045