| Literature DB >> 29739423 |
Kala M Mehta1, Dolores Gallagher-Thompson2, Mathew Varghese3, Santosh Loganathan3, Upasana Baruah3, Katrin Seeher4, Diana Zandi4, Tarun Dua4, Anne Margriet Pot4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dementia has a huge physical, psychological, social and economic impact upon caregivers, families and societies at large. There has been a growing impetus to utilize Internet interventions given the potential scalability, and presumed cost-effectiveness and accessibility. In this paper, we describe the design of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) aiming to study the impact of online self-help programs on caregivers of people with dementia in India. The experimental group will receive an interactive training and support program and the comparison group will receive an education-only e-book. It will be among the first online support intervention RCTs for a mental health condition in a lower-middle income country. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29739423 PMCID: PMC5941472 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2604-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trials ISSN: 1745-6215 Impact factor: 2.279
Fig. 1Flowchart of the iSupport Online Self-Help Program. T0 pre-measurement, T1 = first follow up 1–3 months post baseline, T2 second follow up: 2–6 months post T0
Fig. 2SPIRIT Flowchart of the iSupport online self-help program
Fig. 3iSupport: online self-help training and support program
Primary and secondary outcome measures and study variables in the iSupport online support trial
| Outcome measures in the randomized controlled trial (RCT) (number of items, response scale, total scale score range) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Target of scale | Reliability and validity of scales | Cronbach’s alpha | Pre measurement (T0) | First Follow up (T1) | Second Follow-up (T2) |
| Zarit Burden Scale (22, 0–4, 0–88)a | Perceived stress of caregiving | Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.88 to 0.89 | Cronbach’s α = 0.82 to 0.93 | X | X | |
| CES-D10 | Depression | Test-retest reliability (r values = 0.41 to 0.70) | Cronbach’s α = 0.80 to 0.85 | X | X | X |
| GAD | Anxiety | ICC = 0.83 | Cronbach’s α = 0.92 | X | X | |
| Secondary | ||||||
| EuroQoL-5D | Quality of Life | ICC = 0.70 | No overall Cronbach's α reported | X | X | |
| Mastery (7 items, 1–4, 7–28)e | Perlin 7-item Mastery Scale | Principal component factor loadings ranging from − 0.47 to 0.76 | X | X | ||
| Self-efficacy (1, 0–5, 0–40)f | RIS Self-efficacy Scale | Cronbach’s α = 0.72 to 0.79 | X | |||
| Confounders/modifying Variables | ||||||
| Behavioral Problems RMBPC (6, 0–4, 0–24)g | Revised Memory and Behavioral Problems Checklist | Rs = 0.29, .31, .26; ps < .01 correlations between subscales and caregiver depression (CES-D) and burden (Caregiver Stress Scale) | Cronbach’s α values are: .75 for frequency and .76 for reaction for memory problems .82 and .77 for depression and .62 and .70 for disruptive behavior | X | X | |
| Functional status of person with dementia ADh | Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in older people (AD8) | Cronbach’s α = 0.84 | X | X | ||
| Demographic variables caregiver’s age, caregiver sex, relationship to the person with dementia (spouse, adult child, or other family member), level of education, living arrangement (living together or apart from the person with dementia) | X | |||||
aZarit S, Reever KE, Back Peterson. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. The Gerontologist. 1980;20:649–655
bBjörgvinsson T, Kertz SJ, Bigda-Peyton JS, McCoy KL, Aderka IM. Psychometric properties of the CES-D 10 in a psychiatric sample. Assessment. 2013;20: 429–436
Radloff LS. CES-D scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general populations. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–401
cSpitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. Arch Inern Med. 2006;166:1092–1097
dBrooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F (Ed.). The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: a European perspective: evidence from the EuroQol BIO MED Research Programme. Rotterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003
ePearlin LI, Schooler C. The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1978;19:2–21
fSteffen A, McKibbin C, Zeiss A, Gallagher-Thompson D, Bandura A. Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-Efficacy: reliability and validity studies. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57: P74–P86
gTeri L, Truax P, Logsdon R, Uomoto J, Zarit S, Vitaliano PP. (1992). Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: The Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC). Psychology and Aging. 7(4):622–31.
hGalvin JE, Roe CM, Powlishta KK, Coats MA, Muich SJ, Grant E, Miller JP, Storandt M, Morris JC. The AD8: a brief informant interview to detect dementia. Neurology. 2005; 65:559–564
hGalvian JE, Roe CM, Xiong C, Morris JC. Validity and reliability of the AD8 informant interview in dementia. Neurology. 2006;67:1942–1948