Literature DB >> 29738757

Centralizing Esophagectomy to Improve Outcomes and Enhance Clinical Research: Invited Expert Review.

Andrew C Chang1.   

Abstract

Since the 1970s, studies have demonstrated a strong association between operative volume and outcomes such as death and complications, particularly for complex cancer resections such as esophagectomy. The denouement has been to suggest that this operation should be directed toward specialized centers of esophageal cancer care, with operative volume thresholds being the primary basis for evidence-based hospital referral. This article reviews early efforts to centralize esophagectomy, as reported from other countries such as England, Canada, and the Netherlands, as well as the potential effect on access to care from instituting such policies in the United States.
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29738757     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

1.  Inaccurate Clinical Stage Is Common for Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Is Associated with Undertreatment and Worse Outcomes.

Authors:  Michelle R Ju; John D Karalis; James-Michael Blackwell; John C Mansour; Patricio M Polanco; Mathew Augustine; Adam C Yopp; Herbert J Zeh; Sam C Wang; Matthew R Porembka
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Appropriateness of the institute certification system for esophageal surgeries by the Japan Esophageal Society: evaluation of survival outcomes using data from the National Database of Hospital-Based Cancer Registries in Japan.

Authors:  Satoru Motoyama; Eri Maeda; Masahiko Yano; Takushi Yasuda; Masaichi Ohira; Yuichiro Doki; Yasushi Toh; Takahiro Higashi; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.230

3.  Association of hospital and surgeon volume with mortality following major surgical procedures: Meta-analysis of meta-analyses of observational studies.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hoshijima; Zen'ichiro Wajima; Hiroshi Nagasaka; Toshiya Shiga
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Impact of certification status of the institute and surgeon on short-term outcomes after surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer: evaluation using data on 16,752 patients from the National Clinical Database in Japan.

Authors:  Satoru Motoyama; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Hiroaki Miyata; Masahiko Yano; Takushi Yasuda; Masaichi Ohira; Yoshiaki Kajiyama; Yasushi Toh; Masayuki Watanabe; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Yasuyuki Seto; Yuichiro Doki; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.230

5.  Adequate Lymphadenectomy as a Quality Measure in Esophageal Cancer: Is there an Association with Treatment Approach?

Authors:  Cary Jo R Schlick; Rhami Khorfan; David D Odell; Ryan P Merkow; David J Bentrem
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.339

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.