Jean-Thomas Bachelet1, Guillaume Cordier2, Matthieu Porcheray2, Jerome Bourlet2, Arnaud Gleizal3, Jean-Marc Foletti4. 1. Resident, Oral and Maxillofacial Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CHU Lyon, Lyon, France. Electronic address: jean-thomas.bachelet@chu-lyon.fr. 2. Resident, Oral and Maxillofacial Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CHU Lyon, Lyon, France. 3. Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CHU Lyon, Lyon, France. 4. Associate Professor, Aix Marseille Univeristy, APHM, IFSTTAR, LBA, CHU Nord et Conception, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale, Marseille, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the orbital patient-specific implant (PSI) directly printed in porous titanium for the reconstruction of complex orbital bone defects in a series of 12 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors designed and implemented a case series. The sample consisted of patients with unilateral complex orbital bone loss. All patients received a porous titanium PSI designed from the healthy contralateral side (mirroring). The criteria analyzed were the functional results: correction of enophthalmos, correction of ocular motility, operative time, complications, and operative revisions. The study was performed from 2015 through 2017. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 12 patients (mean age, 47 yr; age range, 13 to 70 yr). Patients were followed for a mean of 36 weeks postoperatively (range, 4 to 100 weeks). Twelve of the 12 patients presented preoperative enophthalmia, and 8 of the 12 patients presented preoperative diplopia. The mean operating time was 71 minutes (range, 60 to 200 minutes). For 8 patients, the follow-up was simple. In contrast, 2 patients required surgical revision with repositioning of the implant because of intraoperative implant malpositioning with esthetic or functional disturbance and malpositioning was confirmed on the postoperative computed tomogram, 1 patient required explantation of his implant 7 months after the surgery because of spheno-orbital meningioma recurrence (the implant was well positioned), and 1 patient operated on by a subciliary approach presented a postoperative ectropion. In this series of porous titanium orbital PSIs without positioning guides, 17% had malpositioning (2 patients who required a new intervention for repositioning). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that porous titanium PSI could be a surgical option for patients with complex orbital bone defects. In this series 17% of the sample needed a second operation. There are several ways to improve these results, such as intraoperative navigation or integrated positioning guides.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the orbital patient-specific implant (PSI) directly printed in porous titanium for the reconstruction of complex orbital bone defects in a series of 12 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors designed and implemented a case series. The sample consisted of patients with unilateral complex orbital bone loss. All patients received a porous titanium PSI designed from the healthy contralateral side (mirroring). The criteria analyzed were the functional results: correction of enophthalmos, correction of ocular motility, operative time, complications, and operative revisions. The study was performed from 2015 through 2017. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 12 patients (mean age, 47 yr; age range, 13 to 70 yr). Patients were followed for a mean of 36 weeks postoperatively (range, 4 to 100 weeks). Twelve of the 12 patients presented preoperative enophthalmia, and 8 of the 12 patients presented preoperative diplopia. The mean operating time was 71 minutes (range, 60 to 200 minutes). For 8 patients, the follow-up was simple. In contrast, 2 patients required surgical revision with repositioning of the implant because of intraoperative implant malpositioning with esthetic or functional disturbance and malpositioning was confirmed on the postoperative computed tomogram, 1 patient required explantation of his implant 7 months after the surgery because of spheno-orbital meningioma recurrence (the implant was well positioned), and 1 patient operated on by a subciliary approach presented a postoperative ectropion. In this series of porous titanium orbital PSIs without positioning guides, 17% had malpositioning (2 patients who required a new intervention for repositioning). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that porous titanium PSI could be a surgical option for patients with complex orbital bone defects. In this series 17% of the sample needed a second operation. There are several ways to improve these results, such as intraoperative navigation or integrated positioning guides.