Literature DB >> 29738352

The Effect of Obesity on the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: Results From a Large Observational Study.

Ava B Anklesaria1,2, Elena A Ivanina2, Kenechukwu O Chudy-Onwugaje2, Kevin Tin2, Chaya M Levine2, Peter Homel, Mary Rojas2, Ira E Mayer2, Rabin Rahmani2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been linked to suboptimal bowel preparation but this association has not been conclusively investigated in prospective studies. GOALS: Our objective was to determine whether any relationship exists between obesity as measured by body mass index (BMI) and quality of bowel preparation. STUDY: Adult patients who presented for outpatient colonoscopy at a single urban ambulatory surgery center within a 6-month period and fulfilled inclusion criteria were prospectively enrolled for the study. Patients were divided by BMI into subcategories based on the World Health Organization international classification of obesity. The Modified Aronchick scale was used to assess bowel preparation for colonoscopy. A univariate and multivariate analysis was used to determine a possible association between BMI and poor preparation.
RESULTS: A total of 1429 patients were evaluated. On the basis of inclusion criteria, 1314 subjects were analyzed, out of which 73% were overweight or obese. Inadequate bowel preparation was noted in 21.1% of patients. There was no correlation between obesity and the quality of the bowel preparation. Male gender (P=0.002), diabetes mellitus (P<0.0001), liver cirrhosis (P=0.001), coronary artery disease (P=0.003), refractory constipation (P<0.0001), and current smoking (P=0.01) were found to be independently predictive of poor bowel preparation.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased BMI is not predictive of suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The results of our study are pivotal given the increased risk of colorectal cancer in obese patients and their known lower rate of colorectal cancer screening in certain populations. It is important to avoid subjecting these patients to an intensive bowel preparation that may further discourage screening in a patient population that requires it.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 29738352     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  4 in total

1.  Open Access Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: An Evaluation of Appropriateness and Quality.

Authors:  Nikhil Kapila; Harjinder Singh; Kiranmayee Kandragunta; Fernando J Castro
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation in overweight and obese adults: subanalysis by body mass index from a phase III, assessor-blinded study.

Authors:  Lawrence Hookey; Gerald Bertiger; Kenneth Lee Johnson; Mena Boules; Masakazu Ando; David N Dahdal
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  Low-residue diet for colonoscopy in veterans: Risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation and patient satisfaction and compliance.

Authors:  Chethan Ramprasad; Sandy Ng; Yian Zhang; Peter S Liang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Educating Outpatients for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy Using Conventional Methods vs Virtual Reality Videos Plus Conventional Methods: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Guorong Chen; Yi Zhao; Feng Xie; Wen Shi; Yingyun Yang; Aiming Yang; Dong Wu
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.