Literature DB >> 29737955

Comparison of Two Neutral Oral Contrast Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Jonathan R Dillman1, Alexander J Towbin1, Rebecca Imbus1, Julie Young1, Erica Gates1, Andrew T Trout1.   

Abstract

Purpose To prospectively compare small bowel distention provided by, as well as patient acceptance of, two different neutral (negative) oral contrast materials used for cross-sectional enterography in a pediatric population. Materials and Methods In this noninferiority study, 66 pediatric patients undergoing clinical computed tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) enterography were randomized to receive either a flavored beverage for neutral abdominal and pelvic imaging (Breeza; Beekley Medical, Bristol, Conn) or a low-density barium sulfate suspension. Patients were blinded to the oral contrast material administered and were asked to rate taste, texture, and their perceived health state (where 0 was very bad and 10 was very good). Ingested volume of the prescribed weight-based oral contrast material preparation was recorded. Maximum small bowel diameter was measured in all four abdominal quadrants. Mean bowel diameter as well as taste, texture, and health state scores were compared between cohorts by using t tests; proportions were compared by using Fisher exact tests. Results Thirty-three patients each received Breeza and barium sulfate suspension, respectively. No difference was found in age (Breeza, 13.5 years ± 2.6 [standard deviation]; barium sulfate suspension, 13.9 years ± 2.8; P = .49), sex distribution (15 girls each; P > .99), or health state (P = .21) between cohorts. Twenty-eight of 33 (84.8%) and 17 of 33 (51.5%) patients completed the Breeza and barium sulfate suspension preparations, respectively (P = .007). Breeza received higher scores for taste (6.1 ± 2.5 vs 2.7 ± 2.5; P < .0001) and texture (7.3 ± 2.3 vs 3.6 ± 2.9; P < .0001). No difference was found in bowel distention between Breeza and barium sulfate suspension (1.63 cm ± 0.24 vs 1.69 cm ± 0.25; P = .44). Conclusion The neutral oral contrast materials Breeza and low-density barium sulfate suspension provide similar small bowel distention. Patients receiving Breeza are more likely to ingest the entire prescribed volume. © RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29737955     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018173039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of three oral contrast preparations for magnetic resonance enterography in pediatric patients with known or suspected Crohn disease: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ravi V Gottumukkala; Annette LaPointe; Donna Sargent; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-09

2.  An MRI-guided HIFU-triggered wax-coated capsule for supertargeted drug release: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Simon Matoori; Maurizio Roveri; Peter Tiefenboeck; Annatina Romagna; Olha Wuerthinger; Orpheus Kolokythas; Johannes M Froehlich
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2019-03-05

3.  Evaluation of the performance of two neutral oral contrast agents in computed tomography enterography: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Meng Qi Zheng; Qing Shi Zeng; Yong Quan Yu; Rui Ji; Yue Yue Li; Ming Ming Zhang; Yi Ning Sun; Li Xiang Li; Xiu Li Zuo; Xiao Yun Yang; Yan Qing Li
Journal:  J Dig Dis       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.325

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.