Literature DB >> 29737513

Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.

M C Halls1, G Berardi2, F Cipriani1,3, L Barkhatov4, P Lainas5, S Harris6, M D'Hondt7, F Rotellar8, I Dagher5, L Aldrighetti3, R I Troisi2, B Edwin4, M Abu Hilal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that patient, surgical, tumour and operative variables affect the complexity of laparoscopic liver resections. However, current difficulty scoring systems address only tumour factors. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model for the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resections.
METHODS: The prospectively maintained databases of seven European tertiary referral liver centres were compiled. Data from two-thirds of the patients were used for development and one-third for validation of the model. Intraoperative complications were based on a modified Satava classification. Using the methodology of the Framingham Heart Study, developed to identify risk factors that contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease, factors found to predict intraoperative complications independently were assigned points, and grouped into low-, moderate-, high- and extremely high-risk groups based on the likelihood of intraoperative complications.
RESULTS: A total of 2856 patients were included. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, lesion type and size, classification of resection and previous open liver resection were found to be independent predictors of intraoperative complications. Patients with intraoperative complications had a longer duration of hospital stay (5 versus 4 days; P < 0·001), higher complication rates (32·5 versus 15·5 per cent; P < 0·001), and higher 30-day (3·0 versus 0·3 per cent; P < 0·001) and 90-day (3·8 versus 0·8 per cent; P < 0·001) mortality rates than those who did not. The model was able to predict intraoperative complications (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) 0·677, 95 per cent c.i. 0·647 to 0·706) as well as postoperative 90-day mortality (AUC 0·769, 0·681 to 0·858).
CONCLUSION: This comprehensive scoring system, based on patient, surgical and tumour factors, and developed and validated using a large multicentre European database, helped estimate the risk of intraoperative complications.
© 2018 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29737513     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  26 in total

1.  The Italian Consensus on minimally invasive simultaneous resections for synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer: A Delphi methodology.

Authors:  Aldo Rocca; Federica Cipriani; Paolo Delrio; Fulvio Calise; Luca Aldrighetti; Giulio Belli; Stefano Berti; Ugo Boggi; Vincenzo Bottino; Umberto Cillo; Matteo Cescon; Matteo Cimino; Francesco Corcione; Luciano De Carlis; Maurizio Degiuli; Paolo De Paolis; Agostino Maria De Rose; Domenico D'Ugo; Fabrizio Di Benedetto; Ugo Elmore; Giorgio Ercolani; Giuseppe M Ettorre; Alessandro Ferrero; Marco Filauro; Felice Giuliante; Salvatore Gruttadauria; Alfredo Guglielmi; Francesco Izzo; Elio Jovine; Andrea Laurenzi; Francesco Marchegiani; Pierluigi Marini; Marco Massani; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Michela Mineccia; Francesco Minni; Andrea Muratore; Simone Nicosia; Riccardo Pellicci; Riccardo Rosati; Nadia Russolillo; Antonino Spinelli; Gaya Spolverato; Guido Torzilli; Giovanni Vennarecci; Luca Viganò; Leonardo Vincenti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-06-05

2.  Validation and performance of three-level procedure-based classification for laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Shogo Tanaka; David Fuks; Akishige Kanazawa; Yutaka Takeda; Fumitoshi Hirokawa; Hiroyuki Nitta; Takayoshi Nakajima; Takashi Kaizu; Masaki Kaibori; Toru Kojima; Yuichiro Otsuka; Shoji Kubo; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Norihiro Kokudo; Hironori Kaneko; Go Wakabayashi; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  [Technical aspects of laparoscopic liver surgery : Transfer from open to laparoscopic liver surgery].

Authors:  S Heinrich; J Mittler; V Tripke; H Lang
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Chasing the right path: tips, tricks and challenges of robotic approach to posterior segments.

Authors:  Fabrizio Di Benedetto; Giuseppe Tarantino; Paolo Magistri
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Laparoscopic versus open resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery programme (ORANGE Segments): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christoph Kuemmerli; Robert S Fichtinger; Alma Moekotte; Luca A Aldrighetti; Somaiah Aroori; Marc G H Besselink; Mathieu D'Hondt; Rafael Díaz-Nieto; Bjørn Edwin; Mikhail Efanov; Giuseppe M Ettorre; Krishna V Menon; Aali J Sheen; Zahir Soonawalla; Robert Sutcliffe; Roberto I Troisi; Steven A White; Lloyd Brandts; Gerard J P van Breukelen; Jasper Sijberden; Siân A Pugh; Zina Eminton; John N Primrose; Ronald van Dam; Mohammed Abu Hilal
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Association of standardized liver volume and body mass index with outcomes of minimally invasive liver resections.

Authors:  Darren W Chua; Nicholas Syn; Ye-Xin Koh; Jin-Yao Teo; Peng-Chung Cheow; Alexander Y F Chung; Chung-Yip Chan; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Difficulty scores in laparoscopic liver surgery-getting closer to a powerful and necessary tool.

Authors:  Ruben Ciria; Maria Dolores Ayllon; Javier Briceño
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.293

8.  A novel scoring system for conversion and complication in laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Yifan Tong; Zheyong Li; Lin Ji; Yifan Wang; Weijia Wang; Jiangbo Ying; Xiujun Cai
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 9.  Minimally invasive liver surgery: the Charité experience.

Authors:  Maximilian Nösser; Linda Feldbrügge; Johann Pratschke
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2021-09-28

10.  Transition from laparoscopic to robotic liver surgery: clinical outcomes, learning curve effect, and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  M D'Hondt; A Devooght; E Willems; D Wicherts; C De Meyere; I Parmentier; A Provoost; H Pottel; C Verslype
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.