Literature DB >> 29736848

The most downloaded and most cited articles in radiology journals: a comparative bibliometric analysis.

Sora Baek1, Dae Young Yoon2, Kyoung Ja Lim3, Young Kwon Cho1, Young Lan Seo1, Eun Joo Yun1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the characteristics of the most downloaded and most cited articles in radiology journals.
METHODS: We selected 41 radiology journals that provided lists of both the most downloaded and most cited articles on their websites, and identified the 596 most downloaded articles and 596 most cited articles. We compared the following characteristics of the most downloaded and most cited articles: year of publication, journal title, department of the first author, country of origin, publication type, radiologic subspecialty, radiologic technique and accessibility.
RESULTS: Compared to the most cited articles, the most downloaded articles were more frequently review articles (36.1% vs 17.1%, p < 0.05), case reports (5.9% vs 3.2%, p < 0.05), guidelines/consensus statements (5.4% vs 2.7%, p < 0.05), editorials/commentaries (3.7% vs 0.7%, p < 0.05) and pictorial essays (2.0% vs 0.2%, p < 0.05). Compared to the most cited articles, the most downloaded articles more frequently originated from the UK (8.7% vs 5.0%, p < 0.05) and were more frequently free-access articles (46.0% vs 39.4%, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Educational and free-access articles are more frequent among the most downloaded articles. KEY POINTS: • There was only small overlap between the most downloaded and most cited articles. • Educational articles were more frequent among the most downloaded articles. • Free-access articles are more frequent among the most downloaded articles.

Keywords:  Bibliometric analysis; Publications; Radiology; Research

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29736848     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5423-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  13 in total

1.  Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact.

Authors:  S Lawrence
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals.

Authors:  Michael Callaham; Robert L Wears; Ellen Weber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals.

Authors:  F M Campbell
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1990-10

4.  What are we reading? A study of downloaded and cited articles from the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in 2010.

Authors:  Peter A Brennan; Ahmed Habib
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.651

5.  Understanding bibliometric parameters and analysis.

Authors:  Asim F Choudhri; Adeel Siddiqui; Nickalus R Khan; Harris L Cohen
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Characteristics and trends of radiology research: a survey of original articles published in AJR and Radiology between 2001 and 2010.

Authors:  Kyoung Ja Lim; Dae Young Yoon; Eun Joo Yun; Young Lan Seo; Sora Baek; Dong Hyeon Gu; Soo Jeong Yoon; Ari Han; You Jin Ku; Sam Soo Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Highly cited works in radiology: the top 100 cited articles in radiologic journals.

Authors:  Matthew Pagni; Nickalus R Khan; Harris L Cohen; Asim F Choudhri
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.

Authors:  E Garfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Open access to journal articles in oncology: current situation and citation impact.

Authors:  F Hua; H Sun; T Walsh; A-M Glenny; H Worthington
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker; Nina Stoletzki
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Adipose Tissue-derived Stem cells in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Bibliometric Study.

Authors:  Wenhui Liu; Ke Shi; Xuran Zhu; Hongyan Zhao; Hui Zhang; Andrew Jones; Linbo Liu; Guangshuai Li
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 2.  The Top 50 Most-Cited Knee Arthroscopy Studies.

Authors:  Sierra N Murphy; M Lane Moore; Jordan R Pollock; Kade S McQuivey; Joshua S Bingham
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-24

3.  Trends in hepatocellular carcinoma research from 2008 to 2017: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Yan Miao; Ying Zhang; Lihong Yin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Trends in erectile dysfunction research from 2008 to 2018: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Jialiang Hui; Shuhua He; Ruiyu Liu; Qinyu Zeng; Haibo Zhang; Anyang Wei
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  Characteristics of the Most Cited, Most Downloaded, and Most Mentioned Articles in General Medical Journals: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Hong; Dae Young Yoon; Kyoung Ja Lim; Ji Yoon Moon; Sora Baek; Young Lan Seo; Eun Joo Yun
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.