Literature DB >> 29736625

Two facets of world arsenic problem solution: crop poisoning restriction and enforcement of phytoremediation.

Monika Kofroňová1, Petra Mašková2, Helena Lipavská1.   

Abstract

MAIN
CONCLUSION: This review provides insights into As toxicity in plants with focus on photosynthesis and sugar metabolism as important arsenic targets and simultaneously defence tools against accompanying oxidative stress. Heavy metal contamination is a great problem all over the world. Arsenic, a metalloid occurring naturally in the Earth's crust, also massively spreads out in the environment by human activities. Its accumulation in crops poses a severe health risk to humans and animals. Besides the restriction of human-caused contamination, there are two basic ways how to cope with the problem: first, to limit arsenic accumulation in harvestable parts of the crops; second, to make use of some arsenic hyperaccumulating plants for phytoremediation of contaminated soils and waters. Progress in the use of both strategies depends strongly on the level of our knowledge on the physiological and morphological processes resulting from arsenic exposure. Arsenic uptake is mediated preferentially by P and Si transporters and its accumulation substantially impairs plant metabolism at numerous levels including damages through oxidative stress. Rice is a predominantly studied crop where substantial progress has been made in understanding of the mechanisms of arsenic uptake, distribution, and detoxification, though many questions still remain. Full exploitation of plant potential for soil and water phytoremediations also requires deep understanding of the plant response to this toxic metalloid. The aim of this review is to summarize data regarding the effect of arsenic on plant physiology with a focus on mechanisms providing increased arsenic tolerance and/or hyperaccumulation. The emphasis is placed on the topic unjustifiably neglected in the previous reviews - i.e., carbohydrate metabolism, tightly connected to photosynthesis, and beside others involved in plant ability to cope with arsenic-induced oxidative and nitrosative stresses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antioxidant; Arsenic; Carbohydrates; Nitrosative stress; Oxidative stress; Phytoremediation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29736625     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-018-2906-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  114 in total

1.  Laterally resolved speciation of arsenic in roots of wheat and rice using fluorescence-XANES imaging.

Authors:  Peter M Kopittke; Martin D de Jonge; Peng Wang; Brigid A McKenna; Enzo Lombi; David J Paterson; Daryl L Howard; Simon A James; Kathryn M Spiers; Chris G Ryan; Alexander A T Johnson; Neal W Menzies
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  Genomic potential for arsenic efflux and methylation varies among global Prochlorococcus populations.

Authors:  Jaclyn K Saunders; Gabrielle Rocap
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Heavy metal contamination of topsoils around a lead and zinc smelter in the Republic of Macedonia.

Authors:  Trajce Stafilov; Robert Sajn; Zlatko Pancevski; Blazo Boev; Marina V Frontasyeva; Lyudmila P Strelkova
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  Identification and profiling of arsenic stress-induced microRNAs in Brassica juncea.

Authors:  Sudhakar Srivastava; Ashish Kumar Srivastava; Penna Suprasanna; S F D'Souza
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  A CDC25 homologue from rice functions as an arsenate reductase.

Authors:  Gui-Lan Duan; Yao Zhou; Yi-Ping Tong; Rita Mukhopadhyay; Barry P Rosen; Yong-Guan Zhu
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Reduction and coordination of arsenic in Indian mustard.

Authors:  I J Pickering; R C Prince; M J George; R D Smith; G N George; D E Salt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 7.  Mechanisms to cope with arsenic or cadmium excess in plants.

Authors:  Nathalie Verbruggen; Christian Hermans; Henk Schat
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 7.834

8.  Modulation of antioxidant defence system for arsenic detoxification in Indian mustard.

Authors:  Ishrat Khan; Altaf Ahmad; Muhammad Iqbal
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 6.291

9.  The fronds tonoplast quantitative proteomic analysis in arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata L.

Authors:  Hongling Shen; Zhenyan He; Huili Yan; Zenan Xing; Yanshan Chen; Wenxiu Xu; Wenzhong Xu; Mi Ma
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Transporters of arsenite in rice and their role in arsenic accumulation in rice grain.

Authors:  Jian Feng Ma; Naoki Yamaji; Namiki Mitani; Xiao-Yan Xu; Yu-Hong Su; Steve P McGrath; Fang-Jie Zhao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Water and soil contaminated by arsenic: the use of microorganisms and plants in bioremediation.

Authors:  Philippe N Bertin; Simona Crognale; Frédéric Plewniak; Fabienne Battaglia-Brunet; Simona Rossetti; Michel Mench
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Multi-Component Antioxidative System and Robust Carbohydrate Status, the Essence of Plant Arsenic Tolerance.

Authors:  Monika Kofroňová; Aneta Hrdinová; Petra Mašková; Jana Tremlová; Petr Soudek; Šárka Petrová; Dominik Pinkas; Helena Lipavská
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-27

3.  Remodeling of Root Growth Under Combined Arsenic and Hypoxia Stress Is Linked to Nutrient Deprivation.

Authors:  Vijay Kumar; Lara Vogelsang; Romy R Schmidt; Shanti S Sharma; Thorsten Seidel; Karl-Josef Dietz
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.753

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.