Literature DB >> 29736596

Optimal Therapy Scheduling Based on a Pair of Collaterally Sensitive Drugs.

Nara Yoon1, Robert Vander Velde2, Andriy Marusyk3, Jacob G Scott4.   

Abstract

Despite major strides in the treatment of cancer, the development of drug resistance remains a major hurdle. One strategy which has been proposed to address this is the sequential application of drug therapies where resistance to one drug induces sensitivity to another drug, a concept called collateral sensitivity. The optimal timing of drug switching in these situations, however, remains unknown. To study this, we developed a dynamical model of sequential therapy on heterogeneous tumors comprised of resistant and sensitive cells. A pair of drugs (DrugA, DrugB) are utilized and are periodically switched during therapy. Assuming resistant cells to one drug are collaterally sensitive to the opposing drug, we classified cancer cells into two groups, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], each of which is a subpopulation of cells resistant to the indicated drug and concurrently sensitive to the other, and we subsequently explored the resulting population dynamics. Specifically, based on a system of ordinary differential equations for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], we determined that the optimal treatment strategy consists of two stages: an initial stage in which a chosen effective drug is utilized until a specific time point, T, and a second stage in which drugs are switched repeatedly, during which each drug is used for a relative duration (i.e., [Formula: see text]-long for DrugA and [Formula: see text]-long for DrugB with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]). We prove that the optimal duration of the initial stage, in which the first drug is administered, T, is shorter than the period in which it remains effective in decreasing the total population, contrary to current clinical intuition. We further analyzed the relationship between population makeup, [Formula: see text], and the effect of each drug. We determine a critical ratio, which we term [Formula: see text], at which the two drugs are equally effective. As the first stage of the optimal strategy is applied, [Formula: see text] changes monotonically to [Formula: see text] and then, during the second stage, remains at [Formula: see text] thereafter. Beyond our analytic results, we explored an individual-based stochastic model and presented the distribution of extinction times for the classes of solutions found. Taken together, our results suggest opportunities to improve therapy scheduling in clinical oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Dynamical systems; Evolution of resistance; Optimal control

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29736596     DOI: 10.1007/s11538-018-0434-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  15 in total

1.  Modeling Resistance and Recurrence Patterns of Combined Targeted-Chemoradiotherapy Predicts Benefit of Shorter Induction Period.

Authors:  David M McClatchy; Henning Willers; Aaron N Hata; Zofia Piotrowska; Lecia V Sequist; Harald Paganetti; Clemens Grassberger
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Optimal Strategy and Benefit of Pulsed Therapy Depend On Tumor Heterogeneity and Aggressiveness at Time of Treatment Initiation.

Authors:  Deepti Mathur; Bradford P Taylor; Walid K Chatila; Howard I Scher; Nikolaus Schultz; Pedram Razavi; Joao B Xavier
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.009

3.  Modelling bistable tumour population dynamics to design effective treatment strategies.

Authors:  Andrei R Akhmetzhanov; Jong Wook Kim; Ryan Sullivan; Robert A Beckman; Pablo Tamayo; Chen-Hsiang Yeang
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.405

4.  Optimizing adaptive cancer therapy: dynamic programming and evolutionary game theory.

Authors:  Mark Gluzman; Jacob G Scott; Alexander Vladimirsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Evolving generalists in switching rugged landscapes.

Authors:  Shenshen Wang; Lei Dai
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Antibiotic collateral sensitivity is contingent on the repeatability of evolution.

Authors:  Daniel Nichol; Joseph Rutter; Christopher Bryant; Andrea M Hujer; Sai Lek; Mark D Adams; Peter Jeavons; Alexander R A Anderson; Robert A Bonomo; Jacob G Scott
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Using Selection by Nonantibiotic Stressors to Sensitize Bacteria to Antibiotics.

Authors:  Jeff Maltas; Brian Krasnick; Kevin B Wood
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Cooperative adaptation to therapy (CAT) confers resistance in heterogeneous non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Morgan Craig; Kamran Kaveh; Alec Woosley; Andrew S Brown; David Goldman; Elliot Eton; Ravindra M Mehta; Andrew Dhawan; Kazuya Arai; M Mamunur Rahman; Sidi Chen; Martin A Nowak; Aaron Goldman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  The Individual Effects of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors on Head and Neck Cancer Cells-A Systematic Analysis.

Authors:  Nina Schoenwaelder; Inken Salewski; Nadja Engel; Mareike Krause; Björn Schneider; Michael Müller; Christin Riess; Heiko Lemcke; Anna Skorska; Christina Grosse-Thie; Christian Junghanss; Claudia Maletzki
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  An Optimal Control Framework for the Automated Design of Personalized Cancer Treatments.

Authors:  Fabrizio Angaroni; Alex Graudenzi; Marco Rossignolo; Davide Maspero; Tommaso Calarco; Rocco Piazza; Simone Montangero; Marco Antoniotti
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.