Literature DB >> 29736422

Cerebral microbleeds and blood pressure abnormalities in Parkinson's disease.

Kazuo Yamashiro1, Ryota Tanaka1, Yasushi Shimo1, Genko Oyama1, Takashi Ogawa1, Atsushi Umemura2, Nobutaka Hattori1.   

Abstract

Blood pressure abnormalities are frequently observed in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), and are associated with cerebrovascular diseases such as white matter hyperintensities and carotid atherosclerosis. We assessed the relationship between blood pressure abnormalities and cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), a marker of cerebral small vessel disease, in 128 patients with PD. We examined supine and orthostatic blood pressures and used 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess the presence or absence of orthostatic hypotension (OH), supine hypertension (SH), nocturnal hypertension (NH), and loss of nocturnal blood pressure dips (non-dipping). CMBs were found in 13 (10.2%) patients, and the median number of CMBs was 1 (range: 1 to 10). Six of these patients had deep or infratentorial CMBs, six had strictly lobar CMBs, and one had mixed CMBs. Linear regression analysis indicated that presence of both OH and SH was independently associated with greater numbers of CMBs in deep or infratentorial regions, independent of age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, and white matter hyperintensities. NH and non-dipping were not associated with CMBs in deep or infratentorial regions, and there was no association between blood pressure and CMBs in lobar regions. Our results suggest that the presence of both OH and SH may be related to deep or infratentorial CMBs in patients with PD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomic dysfunction; Cerebral microbleeds; Orthostatic hypotension; Parkinson's disease; Supine hypertension

Year:  2017        PMID: 29736422      PMCID: PMC5933993          DOI: 10.1016/j.ensci.2017.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  eNeurologicalSci        ISSN: 2405-6502


Introduction

Blood pressure abnormalities are common in Parkinson's disease (PD), and may manifest as orthostatic hypotension (OH), supine hypertension (SH), nocturnal hypertension (NH), or loss of nocturnal blood pressure dips (non-dipping), all of which frequently coexist [1]. In patients with PD, these blood pressure abnormalities are associated with cerebrovascular diseases, such as white matter hyperintensities [2], [3], [4] and carotid artery atherosclerosis [5]. Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are small round hypointense lesions seen on T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [6], and are associated with cognitive impairment [7] and recurrence of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke [8]. Histopathological studies indicate that CMBs represent previous extravasation of blood and are related to bleeding-prone microangiopathy [9]. Deep or infratentorial CMBs are associated with hypertension, while lobar CMBs reflect the presence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy [10], [11]. CMBs have mainly been studied in the general population, in patients with stroke, and in those with Alzheimer's disease [12], while few studies have investigated CMBs in patients with PD [13], [14], [15]. Nevertheless, it has been reported that CMBs occur more frequently in patients with PD with dementia compared to those without dementia. Indeed, patients with PD with CMBs have been found to have a poorer performance in the attention domain compared with those without CMBs [13]. Furthermore, comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation showed no significant association between the presence of CMBs and cognitive function in patients with PD without dementia [14]. We previously reported that OH is associated with deep or infratentorial CMBs in patients with PD [15]. However, whether coexisting SH, NH, or non-dipping is related to CMBs remains unanswered. Here, we evaluated supine and orthostatic blood pressure and used 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in patients with PD to assess the relationship between blood pressure abnormalities and CMBs.

Patients and methods

Study population

We enrolled patients diagnosed with PD according to the U.K. Parkinson's disease Society Brain Bank criteria [16]. Participants were recruited consecutively between January 2014 and September 2016 from the Department of Neurology at Juntendo University School of Medicine. One hundred and forty-three patients underwent blood pressure measurements and brain MRI. Three patients were excluded due to unreliable ABPM data and twelve were excluded due to incomplete blood pressure evaluations. Therefore, 128 patients with PD were examined in the present study. We collected clinical information regarding age, sex, disease duration, current medications, body mass index, laboratory data, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. We also determined whether the patients had histories of stroke, coronary artery disease, or cigarette smoking. Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mm Hg, a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mm Hg in the sitting position, or treatment with antihypertensive medications. Diabetes mellitus was defined as a fasting blood glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL, a glycated hemoglobin level ≥ 6.5%, or the use of insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents. Subjects were considered current smokers if they had smoked at least one cigarette per day within the previous year. The mean levodopa equivalent daily dose was calculated for each participant [17]. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Juntendo Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Blood pressure measurements

OH and SH were assessed using the Schellong test. Patients were studied after they had rested in the supine position for 15 min. The patients' blood pressure and heart rate were measured in the supine position, and then measured in the upright position using an electronic sphygmomanometer (ES-H55 or ES-H55B, Terumo). OH was defined as a fall in SBP ≥ 20 mm Hg, or a fall in DBP ≥ 10 mm Hg within 3 min after rising from a supine to a standing position according to the consensus statement [18]. SH was defined as SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg according to the criteria of the American Heart Association [19]. ABPM was performed using an FB-270 device (Fukuda Denshi) every 30 min throughout the day (7:00 AM to 10:00 PM), and every 60 min during the night (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM). Mean SBP, DBP, and heart rate during the daytime, nighttime, and over a 24-hour period were evaluated. Nocturnal BP dip (%) was calculated as (mean daytime SBP – mean nighttime SBP) / mean daytime SBP × 100. Patients with < 10% nocturnal fall in mean BP were considered “non-dippers” according to the consensus guideline [20]. NH was defined as an average nighttime BP ≥ 120/70 mm Hg according to the 2007 European Hypertension Society/European Cardiology Society guidelines [21].

MRI protocol and assessment

Brain MRI was performed using a 3.0 T MR system (GE Healthcare, Discovery MR750w). The whole brain was scanned at a slice thickness of 5 mm with an interslice gap of 1 mm. Twenty-four axial images were obtained. The imaging protocol consisted of T1-weighted (repetition time [TR] = 2800 ms; echo time [TE] = 18 ms; field of view [FOV] = 22 × 22 cm, matrix = 288 × 352), T2-weighted (TR = 4427 ms; TE = 85 ms; FOV = 22 × 22 cm, matrix = 320 × 448), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) (TR = 10,000 ms; TE = 120 ms, inversion time = 2570 ms; FOV = 22 × 22 cm, matrix = 224 × 288), and T2*-weighted gradient echo sequences (TR = 520 ms; TE = 15 ms; flip angle [FA] = 15°, FOV = 22 × 22 cm, matrix = 192 × 256). CMBs were defined as small, homogeneous, round foci of low signal intensity on T2*-weighted images with diameters < 5 mm. Basal ganglia calcification and vascular flow voids were excluded. The Microbleed Anatomical Rating Scale [22] was used to guide this process and identify the locations of the CMBs. Deep and periventricular white matter hyperintensities were graded from zero to three according to the method described by Fazekas et al. [23]. Periventricular hyperintensities of grade 3 or deep white matter hyperintensities of grade 2 or 3 were defined as advanced white matter hyperintensities [24]. The images were analyzed by a trained observer who was blind to the patients' clinical data.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests, as appropriate. The frequencies of categorical variables were compared using χ2 tests. We performed linear regression analysis to assess the relationship between the number of CMBs and blood pressure abnormalities. Models were adjusted for age and sex (model 1), and additionally adjusted for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of stroke, antiplatelet treatment, and the presence of advanced white matter hyperintensities (model 2). The statistical analyses were performed using JMP Version 12.0 software (SAS Inc. Cary, NC, USA). P-values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

One-hundred and twenty-eight patients with PD (mean age, 64.4 ± 9.7 years; 56 males) were included in this study. The mean duration of motor symptoms was 10.7 ± 6.0 years, and the mean Hoehn and Yahr stage score was 2.9 ± 0.9. The clinical characteristics of patients according to the presence of CMBs are shown in Table 1. Thirteen patients (10.2%) had CMBs, in whom the median number of CMBs was 1 (range: 1 to 10). Six of these patients had deep or infratentorial CMBs, six had strictly lobar CMBs, and one had mixed CMBs.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics according to the presence of CMBs.

Any CMBs
Deep or infratentorial CMBs
Lobar CMBs
Present
Absent
p valuePresent
Absent
p valuePresent
Absent
p value
(n = 13)(n = 115)(n = 7)(n = 121)(n = 7)(n = 121)
Age, y72.3 (8.3)63.5 (9.5)< 0.0175.0 (7.3)63.8 (9.5)< 0.0170.0 (8.5)64.1 (9.7)0.12
Male5 (38.5)51 (44.4)0.694 (57.1)52 (43.0)0.462 (28.6)54 (44.6)0.41
BMI, kg/m220.7 (19.8–24.4)21.1 (18.5–24.0)0.5920.5 (18.1–20.7)21.2 (18.5–24.1)0.3723.5 (19.8–24.7)20.9 (18.5–23.9)0.15
eGFR, mL/min per 1.73 m288.4 (25.6)88.3 (21.3)0.9995.7 (29.6)87.9 (21.2)0.3685.6 (23.0)88.5 (21.7)0.73
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL108.9 (32.3)106.5 (27.7)0.7798.3 (26.9)107.3 (28.2)0.41118.0 (33.9)106.1 (27.7)0.28
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL58.3 (17.5)60.7 (12.9)0.5755.3 (14.0)60.7 (13.3)0.3458.6 (20.9)60.5 (12.8)0.71
HbA1c, %5.8 (5.6–6.1)5.7 (5.5–6.0)0.435.6 (5.4–6.1)5.7 (5.5–6.0)0.575.9 (5.7–6.1)5.7 (5.5–6.0)0.26
Hypertension5 (38.5)26 (22.6)0.213 (42.9)28 (23.1)0.242 (28.6)29 (24.0)0.78
Diabetes mellitus2 (15.4)10 (8.8)0.442 (28.6)10 (8.3)0.080 (0)12 (10.0)0.38
Smoking status
 Non-smoker10 (76.9)79 (68.7)0.544 (57.1)85 (70.3)0.356 (85.7)83 (68.6)0.58
 Ex-smoker3 (23.1)26 (22.6)3 (42.9)26 (21.5)1 (14.3)28 (23.1)
 Current smoker0 (0)10 (8.7)0 (0)10 (8.3)0 (0)10 (8.3)
 History of stroke1 (7.7)3 (2.6)0.321 (14.3)3 (2.5)0.080 (0)4 (3.3)0.63
 Antiplatelet3 (23.1)6 (5.2)0.021 (14.3)8 (6.6)0.442 (28.6)7 (5.8)0.02
 Anticoagulant0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)

BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; CMBs, cerebral microbleeds; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein. Values are number (%), mean (standard deviation), or median (interquartile range), as appropriate.

Clinical characteristics according to the presence of CMBs. BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; CMBs, cerebral microbleeds; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein. Values are number (%), mean (standard deviation), or median (interquartile range), as appropriate. Of the total 128 patients, 60 patients (46.9%) had OH and 20 patients (15.6%) had SH (Table 2). In patients with OH or SH, the mean ages were higher in those without such blood pressure abnormalities. The frequency of diuretic use was significantly higher in patients with OH than in those without OH. SH was found in 26.7% of patients with OH. Forty-four patients (34.3%) had OH only, four had SH only (3.1%), and sixteen (12.5%) had both OH and SH. Among the patients with SH, 80% of patients had OH. Mean SBP and DBP levels were higher in patients with OH or SH than those without, at daytime, nighttime, and over the entire 24-hour period. However, the frequencies of NH and non-dippers were not different between these groups.
Table 2

Clinical characteristics according to postural blood pressure abnormalities.

OH
SH
Present
Absent
p valuePresent
Absent
p value
(n = 60)(n = 68)(n = 20)(n = 108)
Age, y67.1 (8.8)62.0 (9.9)< 0.0168.6 (10.9)63.6 (9.4)0.04
Male26 (43.3)30 (44.1)0.9312 (60.0)44 (40.7)0.11
Disease duration, y10 (6.3–15)10 (6–14)0.8110 (6.3–14.8)9 (6–15.8)0.85
Hoehn and Yahr stage3.1 (0.9)2.8 (0.8)0.043.4 (0.9)2.9 (0.8)0.01
Hypertension13 (21.7)18 (26.5)0.5311 (55.0)20 (18.5)< 0.01
Diabetes mellitus6 (10.2)6 (8.8)0.804 (21.1)8 (7.4)0.06
Antihypertensive11 (18.3)16 (23.5)0.477 (35.0)20 (18.5)0.10
ARB6 (10.0)9 (13.2)0.573 (15.0)12 (11.1)0.62
Ca channel blockers4 (6.7)10 (14.7)0.154 (20.0)10 (9.3)0.16
β-blockers1 (1.7)2 (2.9)0.632 (10.0)1 (0.9)0.02
Diuretic4 (6.7)0 (0)0.031 (5.0)3 (2.8)0.60
Antihypotensive6 (10.0)4 (5.9)0.391 (5.0)9 (8.3)0.61
Midodrine0 (0)1 (1.5)0.350 (0)1 (0.9)0.67
Droxidopa6 (10.0)3 (4.4)0.221 (5.0)8 (7.4)0.70
LED, mg850 (721–1100)910 (604–1248)0.91769 (596–917)922 (705–1129)0.06
Supine SBP, mm Hg123.8 (21.4)112.9 (16.6)< 0.01152.2 (16.7)111.7 (12.3)< 0.01
Supine DBP, mm Hg72.3 (11.7)67.9 (11.3)0.0385.0 (13.2)67.1 (9.0)< 0.01
ΔSBP, mm Hg32.5 (19.9)3.8 (10.8)< 0.0139.0 (29.6)13.2 (16.7)< 0.01
ΔDBP, mm Hg15.3 (10.3)− 2.3 (6.9)< 0.0113.5 (14.8)4.5 (11.4)< 0.01
OH60 (100)0 (0)16 (80.0)44 (40.7)< 0.01
SH16 (26.7)4 (5.9)< 0.0120 (100)0 (0)
24-hour SBP, mm Hg118.9 (11.8)112.3 (11.7)< 0.01126.3 (11.9)113.3 (11.1)< 0.01
24-hour DBP, mm Hg78.3 (9.1)73.5 (7.1)< 0.0180.4 (10.5)74.9 (7.7)< 0.01
Daytime SBP, mm Hg120.3 (12.0)114.0 (11.4)< 0.01126.9 (12.0)115.1 (11.2)< 0.01
Daytime DBP, mm Hg80.6 (9.6)75.9 (7.8)< 0.0182.3 (10.5)77.3 (8.4)0.02
Nighttime SBP, mm Hg117.8 (15.4)109.6 (14.7)< 0.01126.4 (14.9)111.0 (14.5)< 0.01
Nighttime DBP, mm Hg75.2 (11.0)69.7 (7.9)< 0.0177.8 (12.5)71.2 (8.9)< 0.01
NH40 (66.7)40 (58.8)0.3616 (80.0)64 (59.3)0.08
Non-dipping47 (78.3)49 (72.1)0.4117 (85.0)79 (73.2)0.26

ARB, angiotensin-receptor blockers; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LED, levodopa equivalent dose; NH, nocturnal hypertension; OH, orthostatic hypotension; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SH, supine hypertension. ΔS(D)BP = S(D)BP supine − S(D)BP standing. Values are number (%), mean (standard deviation), or median (interquartile range), as appropriate.

Clinical characteristics according to postural blood pressure abnormalities. ARB, angiotensin-receptor blockers; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LED, levodopa equivalent dose; NH, nocturnal hypertension; OH, orthostatic hypotension; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SH, supine hypertension. ΔS(D)BP = S(D)BP supine − S(D)BP standing. Values are number (%), mean (standard deviation), or median (interquartile range), as appropriate. On ABPM, 80 patients (62.5%) had NH and 96 patients (75.0%) were non-dippers (Table 3). Mean age was similar between patients with and without NH and non-dipping. In patients with NH, mean supine SBP and DBP levels were higher, and the magnitude of the fall in SBP levels during orthostasis was greater compared to those without NH. The frequencies of OH and SH were, however, not different between patients with NH and those without NH.
Table 3

Clinical characteristics according to nocturnal blood pressure abnormalities.

NH
Non-dipping
Present
Absent
p valuePresent
Absent
p value
(n = 80)(n = 48)(n = 96)(n = 32)
Age, y64.0 (9.0)65.1 (10.9)0.5664.6 (9.0)63.8 (11.7)0.71
Male42 (52.5)14 (29.2)0.0145 (46.9)11 (34.4)0.22
Disease duration, y10 (7–16)10 (6–15)0.8111 (6–13)10 (6.3–15)0.93
Hoehn and Yahr stage2.9 (1.0)3.0 (0.8)0.593.0 (0.9)2.9 (0.9)0.76
Hypertension19 (23.8)12 (25.0)0.8724 (25.0)7 (21.9)0.72
Diabetes mellitus8 (10.0)4 (8.5)0.819 (9.4)3 (9.4)0.99
Antihypertensive16 (20.0)11 (22.9)0.7020 (20.8)7 (21.9)0.90
ARB9 (11.3)6 (12.5)0.8310 (10.4)5 (15.6)0.43
Ca channel blockers10 (12.5)4 (8.3)0.4611 (11.5)3 (9.4)0.74
β-blockers2 (2.5)1 (2.1)0.883 (3.1)0 (0)0.31
Diuretic4 (5.0)0 (0)0.124 (4.2)0 (0)0.24
Antihypotensive8 (10.0)2 (4.2)0.239 (9.4)1 (3.1)0.25
Midodrine1 (1.3)0 (0)0.441 (1.0)0 (0)0.56
Droxidopa7 (8.8)2 (4.2)0.338 (8.3)1 (3.1)0.32
LED, mg910 (721–1244)786 (649–1100)0.24910 (727–1128)783 (595–1150)0.15
Supine SBP, mm Hg121.0 (21.5)113.5 (15.3)0.04119.4 (20.3)114.6 (17.2)0.24
Supine DBP, mm Hg71.6 (12.5)67.2 (9.6)0.0470.4 (12.0)68.7 (10.6)0.48
ΔSBP, mm Hg21.1 (23.0)10.6 (16.3)< 0.0118.7 (21.2)12.6 (21.4)0.17
ΔDBP, mm Hg7.3 (12.9)3.4 (11.1)0.097.1 (12.3)2.1 (11.9)0.05
OH40 (50.0)20 (41.7)0.3647 (49.0)13 (40.6)0.41
SH16 (20.0)4 (8.3)0.0817 (17.7)3 (9.4)0.26
24-hour SBP, mm Hg120.0 (11.3)107.5 (9.4)< 0.01115.9 (12.7)113.7 (10.5)0.38
24-hour DBP, mm Hg79.3 (7.4)69.8 (6.5)< 0.0175.7 (8.6)76.0 (7.8)0.83
Daytime SBP, mm Hg120.1 (11.2)111.6 (11.7)< 0.01115.8 (12.2)120.5 (11.2)0.06
Daytime DBP, mm Hg80.7 (8.1)73.7 (8.6)< 0.0176.9 (8.9)81.8 (8.2)< 0.01
Nighttime SBP, mm Hg120.8 (13.8)101.0 (9.0)< 0.01117.3 (14.9)101.6 (11.0)< 0.01
Nighttime DBP, mm Hg77.4 (8.2)63.4 (4.8)< 0.0174.3 (9.4)66.1 (8.7)< 0.01
NH80 (100)0 (0)69 (71.9)11 (34.4)< 0.01
Non-dipping69 (86.3)27 (56.3)< 0.0196 (100)0 (0)

ARB, angiotensin-receptor blockers; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LED, levodopa equivalent dose; NH, nocturnal hypertension; OH, orthostatic hypotension; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SH, supine hypertension. ΔS(D)BP = S(D)BP supine − S(D)BP standing. Values are number (%), mean (standard deviation), or median (interquartile range), as appropriate.

Clinical characteristics according to nocturnal blood pressure abnormalities. ARB, angiotensin-receptor blockers; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LED, levodopa equivalent dose; NH, nocturnal hypertension; OH, orthostatic hypotension; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SH, supine hypertension. ΔS(D)BP = S(D)BP supine − S(D)BP standing. Values are number (%), mean (standard deviation), or median (interquartile range), as appropriate. The results of blood pressure measurements according to the presence of CMBs are shown in Table 4. Mean supine (p = 0.03), 24-hour (p = 0.02), and daytime (p = 0.02) SBPs were higher in patients with CMBs than in those without CMBs. When we divided the patients into groups based on CMB location, the magnitudes of the falls in SBP (p = 0.02) and DBP (p = 0.02) during orthostasis were greater in patients with deep or infratentorial CMBs than in those without deep or infratentorial CMBs. When the patients were classified into 4 groups according to the presence or absence of OH and SH (non-OH and non-SH group, OH-only group, SH-only group, and both OH and SH group), the prevalence of these groups was significantly different between patients with deep or infratentorial CMBs and those without deep or infratentorial CMBs (p = 0.01). The mean 24-h SBP (p = 0.03), daytime SBP (p < 0.01), and daytime DBP (p = 0.02) were higher in patients with deep or infratentorial CMBs than in those without deep or infratentorial CMBs. There was no difference in the prevalence of non-dipping or NH between patients with and without CMBs at any location.
Table 4

Results of blood pressure measurements according to the presence of CMBs.

Any CMBs
Deep or infratentorial CMBs
Lobar CMBs
Present
Absent
p valuePresent
Absent
p valuePresent
Absent
p value
(n = 13)(n = 115)(n = 7)(n = 121)(n = 7)(n = 121)
Schellong test
Supine SBP, mm Hg129.3 (29.3)116.8 (18.0)0.03131.3 (30.0)117.3 (18.8)0.07112.7 (30.5)117.8 (19.0)0.52
Supine DBP, mm Hg73.2 (14.2)69.6 (11.4)0.2875.4 (12.7)69.6 (11.6)0.2069.0 (15.7)70.0 (11.5)0.83
ΔSBP, mm Hg24.9 (24.0)16.4 (20.9)0.1735.1 (26.0)16.2 (20.6)0.0215.6 (16.2)17.3 (21.6)0.83
ΔDBP, mm Hg9.8 (14.4)5.5 (12.1)0.2316.6 (11.8)5.3 (12.1)0.024.1 (13.9)6.0 (12.3)0.69
Non-OH and non-SH3 (23.1)61 (53.0)0.070 (0)64 (52.9)0.013 (42.9)61 (50.4)0.37
Only OH5 (38.5)39 (33.9)4 (57.1)40 (33.1)2 (28.6)42 (34.7)
Only SH1 (7.7)3 (2.6)0 (0)4 (3.3)1 (14.3)3 (2.5)
Both OH and SH4 (30.8)12 (10.4)3 (42.9)13 (10.7)1 (14.3)15 (12.4)



ABPM
24-hour SBP, mm Hg123.1 (9.4)114.5 (12.2)0.02125.3 (11.2)114.8 (12.0)0.03120.4 (6.3)115.1 (12.4)0.26
24-hour DBP, mm Hg79.0 (7.4)75.4 (8.4)0.1481.6 (8.3)75.4 (8.3)0.0676.7 (5.3)75.7 (8.6)0.76
Daytime SBP, mm Hg124.5 (10.6)116.1 (12.0)0.02129.3 (11.1)116.3 (11.8)< 0.01121.1 (8.8)116.7 (12.2)0.35
Daytime DBP, mm Hg81.6 (9.3)77.7 (8.9)0.1585.7 (10.0)77.7 (8.7)0.0279.1 (8.4)78.1 (9.0)0.76
Nighttime SBP, mm Hg122.5 (12.4)112.4 (15.5)0.03119.3 (15.2)113.1 (15.5)0.31122.6 (11.9)112.9 (15.6)0.11
Nighttime DBP, mm Hg75.7 (7.9)71.9 (10.0)0.1876.0 (9.3)72.0 (9.9)0.3073.9 (7.3)72.2 (10.0)0.66
NH10 (76.9)70 (60.9)0.264 (57.1)76 (62.8)0.766 (85.7)74 (61.2)0.19
Non-dipping11 (84.6)85 (73.9)0.405 (71.4)91 (75.2)0.826 (85.7)90 (74.4)0.50

ABPM, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; CMBs, cerebral microbleeds; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; NH, nocturnal hypertension; OH, orthostatic hypotension; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SH, supine hypertension. ΔS(D)BP = S(D)BP supine − S(D)BP standing. Values are number (%) or mean (standard deviation), as appropriate.

Results of blood pressure measurements according to the presence of CMBs. ABPM, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; CMBs, cerebral microbleeds; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; NH, nocturnal hypertension; OH, orthostatic hypotension; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SH, supine hypertension. ΔS(D)BP = S(D)BP supine − S(D)BP standing. Values are number (%) or mean (standard deviation), as appropriate. When CMBs were examined as a function of blood pressure abnormalities, the prevalence of any CMBs and that of deep or infratentorial CMBs were significantly higher in patients with both OH and SH than in others (p < 0.05). However, the prevalence of CMBs was not significantly different between patients with OH only and others (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Prevalence of cerebral microbleeds. CMBs, cerebral microbleeds; NH, nocturnal hypertension; OH, orthostatic hypotension; SH, supine hypertension. *p < 0.05.

Prevalence of cerebral microbleeds. CMBs, cerebral microbleeds; NH, nocturnal hypertension; OH, orthostatic hypotension; SH, supine hypertension. *p < 0.05. Using linear regression analysis, we found that supine SBP and the presence of both OH and SH were significantly correlated with an increased CMB count in any region (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively), and in deep or infratentorial regions (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively), but not in lobar regions (Table 5). The presence of both OH and SH remained significant after adjustment for age and sex (Table 5, model 1, p < 0.05). Additional adjustments for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, a history of stroke, antiplatelet treatment, and coexisting advanced white matter hyperintensities did not affect this association (Table 5, model 2, p < 0.05).
Table 5

Linear regression analysis for blood pressure components in relation to CMBs count.

Blood pressure componentAny CMBs
Deep or infratentorial CMBs
Lobar CMBs
B (SE)95% CIB (SE)95% CIB (SE)95% CI
Unadjusted
Supine SBP, per SD increase0.167 (0.082)a0.004 to 0.3310.165 (0.080)a0.007 to 0.3230.003 (0.024)− 0.044 to 0.050
ΔSBP, per SD increase0.074 (0.067)− 0.058 to 0.2070.082 (0.065)− 0.047 to 0.210− 0.008 (0.019)− 0.045 to 0.030
ΔDBP, per SD increase0.088 (0.080)− 0.070 to 0.2470.089 (0.078)− 0.065 to 0.243− 0.000 (0.023)− 0.045 to 0.045
Both OH and SH, present vs. absent0.383 (0.125)b0.136 to 0.6320.384 (0.121)b0.145 to 0.6230.000 (0.037)− 0.073 to 0.073
24-hour SBP, per SD increase0.120 (0.082)− 0.043 to 0.2830.087 (0.080)− 0.072 to 0.2450.034 (0.023)− 0.012 to 0.080
Daytime SBP, per SD increase0.097 (0.087)− 0.074 to 0.2690.077 (0.084)− 0.089 to 0.2430.020 (0.025)− 0.028 to 0.069
Daytime DBP, per SD increase0.082 (0.085)− 0.086 to 0.2500.077 (0.082)− 0.085 to 0.2400.004 (0.024)− 0.044 to 0.052
Nighttime SBP, per SD increase0.023 (0.081)− 0.137 to 0.183− 0.016 (0.078)− 0.171 to 0.1390.039 (0.023)− 0.006 to 0.084



Model 1
Supine SBP, per SD increase0.094 (0.086)− 0.076 to 0.2630.095 (0.083)− 0.071 to 0.260− 0.001 (0.025)− 0.051 to 0.049
ΔSBP, per SD increase0.029 (0.066)− 0.102 to 0.1600.041 (0.065)− 0.087 to 0.169− 0.012 (0.019)− 0.050 to 0.265
ΔDBP, per SD increase0.120 (0.082)− 0.043 to 0.2830.109 (0.080)− 0.050 to 0.2680.011 (0.024)− 0.037 to 0.059
Both OH and SH, present vs. absent0.291 (0.127)a0.040 to 0.5420.301 (0.123)a0.057 to 0.545− 0.010 (0.038)− 0.085 to 0.038
24-hour SBP, per SD increase0.067 (0.081)− 0.094 to 0.2280.036 (0.080)− 0.122 to 0.1930.031 (0.024)− 0.016 to 0.078
Daytime SBP, per SD increase0.055 (0.085)− 0.113 to 0.2230.037 (0.083)− 0.126 to 0.2010.018 (0.025)− 0.031 to 0.067
Daytime DBP, per SD increase0.120 (0.082)− 0.043 to 0.2830.109 (0.080)− 0.050 to 0.2680.011 (0.024)− 0.037 to 0.059
Nighttime SBP, per SD increase− 0.049 (0.081)− 0.209 to 0.111− 0.086 (0.078)− 0.241 to 0.0700.036 (0.023)− 0.010 to 0.083



Model 2
Supine SBP, per SD increase0.093 (0.072)− 0.051 to 0.2370.078 (0.070)− 0.061 to 0.2170.015 (0.024)− 0.034 to 0.063
ΔSBP, per SD increase0.039 (0.055)− 0.071 to 0.1480.050 (0.053)− 0.056 to 0.155− 0.011 (0.018)− 0.048 to 0.025
ΔDBP, per SD increase0.055 (0.068)− 0.080 to 0.1900.063 (0.066)− 0.066 to 0.193− 0.009 (0.023)− 0.054 to 0.037
Both OH and SH, present vs. absent0.253 (0.111)a0.036 to 0.4720.249 (0.106)a0.038 to 0.4590.004 (0.038)− 0.071 to 0.079
24-hour SBP, per SD increase0.039 (0.069)− 0.097 to 0.1740.015 (0.066)− 0.115 to 0.1460.023 (0.023)− 0.022 to 0.068
Daytime SBP, per SD increase0.029 (0.071)− 0.112 to 0.1690.010 (0.068)− 0.126 to 0.1450.019 (0.024)− 0.028 to 0.066
Daytime DBP, per SD increase0.066 (0.070)− 0.073 to 0.2050.065 (0.068)− 0.069 to 0.1990.001 (0.0234)− 0.045 to 0.048
Nighttime SBP, per SD increase− 0.068 (0.068)− 0.201 to 0.066− 0.091 (0.065)− 0.219 to 0.0380.023 (0.023)− 0.022 to 0.068

CMBs, cerebral microbleeds; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; OH, orthostatic hypotension; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SH, supine hypertension; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error. ΔS(D)BP = S(D)BP supine − S(D)BP standing. Model 1: adjusted for age and sex; Model 2: additionally adjusted for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of stroke, antiplatelet treatment, and advanced white matter hyperintensities.

p < 0.05.

p < 0.01.

Linear regression analysis for blood pressure components in relation to CMBs count. CMBs, cerebral microbleeds; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; OH, orthostatic hypotension; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SH, supine hypertension; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error. ΔS(D)BP = S(D)BP supine − S(D)BP standing. Model 1: adjusted for age and sex; Model 2: additionally adjusted for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of stroke, antiplatelet treatment, and advanced white matter hyperintensities. p < 0.05. p < 0.01.

Discussion

Here, we demonstrated that the presence of both OH and SH is associated with increased CMB count in deep or infratentorial regions, independently of age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, and coexisting cerebrovascular disease. However, NH and non-dipping, as assessed by ABPM, were not associated with CMBs. Furthermore, there were no associations between any blood pressure abnormalities and CMBs in lobar regions. Recent research has suggested a negative impact of blood pressure abnormalities on the cerebrovascular system in patients with PD. For instance, the presence of OH, SH, or both have been associated with advanced white matter lesions [2]. Furthermore, orthostatic blood pressure changes and supine blood pressure [3], and the presence of NH and nighttime SBP [4], have been found to be positively correlated with the severity of white matter lesions. In addition, increased intima media thickness of the carotid artery has been associated with OH, SH, and supine and overnight blood pressure [5]. It has been suggested that autonomic dysfunction might share some pathophysiological aspects with target organ damage in essential hypertension [25]. SH is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy [26] and renal impairment [27] in patients with primary autonomic failure. Our study showed that OH was associated with deep or infratentorial CMBs in combination with SH, but not when it existed alone. These findings indicate that cerebral hypoperfusion by OH alone is not sufficient to cause deep or infratentorial CMBs, and that SH contributes to the development of such lesions. This is consistent with evidence that deep or infratentorial CMBs may reflect hypertensive microangiopathy in general [9], [10], [11], [12]. In our study, it was not possible to analyze the relative contributions of OH and SH to CMBs separately because most patients with SH (85%) had coexisting OH. Whether SH alone is sufficient to cause CMBs thus remains unknown. However, it should be noted that vasodilation of cerebral vessels occurs to ensure cerebral hypoperfusion during OH [28], and Indelicato et al. [29] have suggested that such adaptations of autoregulation to chronic OH may be directly related to increased susceptibility to hypertensive peaks. Associations between blood pressure abnormalities, as assessed by ABPM, and CMBs have been found in other patient groups. For example, the presence of CMBs is associated with daytime, nighttime, and 24-hour blood pressure levels and NH, but not with nocturnal dipping in hypertensive subjects without a history of cerebrovascular disease [24]. Nocturnal reverse dipping (blood pressure increase during nighttime) is associated with CMBs in patients with both hypertension and ischemic stroke [30]. However, CMBs were associated with neither NH nor nocturnal dipping in our study. Thus, the presence of both OH and SH in particular may be more strongly associated with CMBs than nocturnal blood pressure abnormalities in patients with PD. Our study has some limitations. First, due to the cross-sectional design of the study, we were unable to make causal inferences. In addition, the number of patients with CMBs was small in the present study, which could weaken the statistical power. Indeed, the prevalence of CMBs in our present study (10.2%) was lower than that in other and our previous studies [14], [15] (approximately 17%), which might be explained by a difference in age. Second, whether the risk of CMBs in patients with PD is greater than that of age-matched healthy controls was not determined. Further studies are needed to determine whether the association between orthostatic blood pressure abnormalities and CMBs is specific to patients with PD or if it also applies to non-PD individuals. Third, 24-h blood pressure monitoring and hospitalization may interfere with quality of sleep and affect the accuracy of the nighttime blood pressure measurements. Data on sleep quality during hospitalization was not obtained in our study. Another limitation is the possible influence of medications on blood pressure abnormalities. Namely, OH may be associated with antihypertensive and anti-Parkinson drugs. Our study showed that the frequency of diuretic use was significantly higher in patients with OH than in those without OH. Thus, diuretic use might be associated with the occurrence of OH in our patients. Meanwhile, anti-hypotensive drugs are widely used in patients with OH and may cause SH. However, the prevalence of anti-hypotensive use was not different in patients with and without SH. Thus, SH was not merely the result of anti-hypotensive treatment in patients with OH. SH is frequently found in patients with PD with OH; Umehara et al. reported that 55% of patients with OH had SH [31]. In our study, the prevalence of SH was 26.7% in patients with OH. This difference may be related to the lower prevalence of hypertension and the lower age of patients in our study than in theirs, which was associated with the prevalence of SH [31]. Although the mechanisms of co-occurrence of OH and SH in PD remain poorly understood, baroreflex failure and abnormal natriuresis may be implicated [32].

Conclusion

Our results suggest the importance of coexisting OH and SH in cerebrovascular injury in patients with PD. Myriad episodes of cerebral hypo- and hyperperfusion related to OH and SH may contribute to CMBs in deep or infratentorial regions. Future studies should be carried out to address whether modifying blood pressure abnormalities is beneficial in preventing such lesions.

Funding

This study was supported by the Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant (H26-Nanchito(Nan)-Ippan-085).

Disclosure of conflicts of interest

The authors have no financial or other conflicts of interest to declare.
  32 in total

1.  Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases.

Authors:  A J Hughes; S E Daniel; L Kilford; A J Lees
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  Cerebral microbleeds and recurrent stroke risk: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack cohorts.

Authors:  Andreas Charidimou; Puneet Kakar; Zoe Fox; David J Werring
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 4.  Cerebral autoregulation and white matter lesions in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy.

Authors:  Elisabetta Indelicato; Alessandra Fanciulli; Werner Poewe; Angelo Antonini; Francesco E Pontieri; Gregor K Wenning
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.891

5.  Histopathologic analysis of foci of signal loss on gradient-echo T2*-weighted MR images in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: evidence of microangiopathy-related microbleeds.

Authors:  F Fazekas; R Kleinert; G Roob; G Kleinert; P Kapeller; R Schmidt; H P Hartung
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Task Force II: blood pressure measurement and cardiovascular outcome.

Authors:  J A Staessen; R Asmar; M De Buyzere; Y Imai; G Parati; K Shimada; G Stergiou; J Redón; P Verdecchia
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.444

7.  MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging.

Authors:  F Fazekas; J B Chawluk; A Alavi; H I Hurtig; R A Zimmerman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Prevalence and risk factors of cerebral microbleeds: the Rotterdam Scan Study.

Authors:  M W Vernooij; A van der Lugt; M A Ikram; P A Wielopolski; W J Niessen; A Hofman; G P Krestin; M M B Breteler
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Associations of durations of antiplatelet use and vascular risk factors with the presence of cerebral microbleeds.

Authors:  Kazuo Yamashiro; Ryota Tanaka; Yasuyuki Okuma; Yuji Ueno; Yasutaka Tanaka; Nobutaka Hattori; Takao Urabe
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 10.  Cerebral microbleeds: a review of clinical, genetic, and neuroimaging associations.

Authors:  Paul A Yates; Victor L Villemagne; Kathryn A Ellis; Patricia M Desmond; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  5 in total

1.  Iron deposition heterogeneity in extrapyramidal system assessed by quantitative susceptibility mapping in Parkinson's disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Wanyao Li; Bingbing Gao; Wei Du; Yuhan Jiang; Jing Yang; Rui Hu; Yangyingqiu Liu; Na Liu; Yukun Zhang; Qingwei Song; Yanwei Miao
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 5.702

Review 2.  Abnormal circadian blood pressure regulation and cognitive impairment in α-synucleinopathies.

Authors:  Ryota Tanaka; Nobutaka Hattori
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.528

3.  The impact of supine hypertension on target organ damage and survival in patients with synucleinopathies and neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.

Authors:  Jose-Alberto Palma; Gabriel Redel-Traub; Angelo Porciuncula; Daniela Samaniego-Toro; Patricio Millar Vernetti; Yvonne W Lui; Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann; Horacio Kaufmann
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.891

4.  Impact of Circadian Blood Pressure Pattern on Silent Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anthipa Chokesuwattanaskul; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Charat Thongprayoon; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Tarun Bathini; Michael A Mao; Liam D Cato; Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  The absence of orthostatic heart rate increase is associated with cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Ryota Tanaka; Kazuo Yamashiro; Takashi Ogawa; Genko Oyama; Kenya Nishioka; Atsushi Umemura; Yasushi Shimo; Nobutaka Hattori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.