| Literature DB >> 29736413 |
Song Jiang1,2,3,4, Peng-Xiang Hou1,5, Mao-Lin Chen1,5, Bing-Wei Wang1,4, Dong-Ming Sun1,5, Dai-Ming Tang1,5, Qun Jin1,4, Qing-Xun Guo6, Ding-Dong Zhang1,5, Jin-Hong Du1,5, Kai-Ping Tai1,5, Jun Tan1,5, Esko I Kauppinen7, Chang Liu1,5, Hui-Ming Cheng1,2,5,8.
Abstract
Single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) are ideal for fabricating transparent conductive films because of their small diameter, good optical and electrical properties, and excellent flexibility. However, a high intertube Schottky junction resistance, together with the existence of aggregated bundles of SWCNTs, leads to a degraded optoelectronic performance of the films. We report a network of isolated SWCNTs prepared by an injection floating catalyst chemical vapor deposition method, in which crossed SWCNTs are welded together by graphitic carbon. Pristine SWCNT films show a record low sheet resistance of 41 ohm □-1 at 90% transmittance for 550-nm light. After HNO3 treatment, the sheet resistance further decreases to 25 ohm □-1. Organic light-emitting diodes using this SWCNT film as anodes demonstrate a low turn-on voltage of 2.5 V, a high current efficiency of 75 cd A-1, and excellent flexibility. Investigation of isolated SWCNT-based field-effect transistors shows that the carbon-welded joints convert the Schottky contacts between metallic and semiconducting SWCNTs into near-ohmic ones, which significantly improves the conductivity of the transparent SWCNT network. Our work provides a new avenue of assembling individual SWCNTs into macroscopic thin films, which demonstrate great potential for use as transparent electrodes in various flexible electronics.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29736413 PMCID: PMC5935479 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aap9264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Microstructures of isolated SWCNTs with carbon-welded joints.
(A) Typical TEM image. Scale bar, 10 nm. (B) Statistical data of the numbers of isolated and bundled SWCNTs in the network. (C) Raman spectrum excited by a 633-nm laser. (D) C 1s XPS spectrum. a.u., arbitrary units.
Fig. 2SEM images, length distribution, and Raman spectra of the SWCNTs.
(A and B) SEM images of SWCNT networks on SiO2/Si wafers transferred from filter membranes with collection times of 10 min and 5 s, respectively. Scale bars, 0.5 μm (A) and 10 μm (B). (C) Length distribution of the SWCNTs measured by SEM. (D) RBM mode Raman spectra of the SWCNTs excited by 532-, 633-, and 785-nm lasers.
Fig. 3Performance of SWCNT TCFs.
(A) Optical image of an 80 mm × 80 mm SWCNT TCF. (B) T (for 550-nm light) versus Rs of our SWCNT TCFs together with the previously reported results for untreated CNT TCFs in the literature (, , , , , ) and a superior ITO TCF on a polymer substrate (). (C) T (for 550-nm light) versus Rs of our doped SWCNT TCFs together with the reported results for doped CNT TCFs in the literature (–, , , ) and the superior ITO TCF (). For our SWCNT TCFs in (B) and (C), the Rs was measured at least four different points for every TCF, and the maximum Rs deviation for specific T is below 6% by performing three or four experiments. (D) Variations in Rs of the pristine and the HNO3-doped SWCNT TCFs exposed to ambient air for over 20 months. (E) Variations in Rs of the SWCNT and the commercial ITO-PET TCFs as a function of the cycles of bending to a radius of 5 mm. (F) Variations in Rs versus bending angle for the SWCNT and the commercial ITO-PET TCFs.
Fig. 4Phosphorescent green SWCNT OLED and its performance.
(A) Optical image of a lit SWCNT OLED. (B) Current density and luminance versus voltage. (C) Current efficiency and power efficiency versus luminance. (D) A comparison of the current efficiency and luminance of our SWCNT OLED with those of the previously reported CNT anode–based OLEDs in the literature (–) and the best ITO-PET OLED ().
Fig. 5Layout and performance of SWCNT FETs.
(A and C) SEM images of two representative SWCNT FETs without (A) and with (C) the carbon-welded joint. Scale bars, 1 μm. The inset AFM images show the deposited carbon (white part) on the SWCNTs. Scale bars, 100 and 200 nm, respectively. (B and D) Ids versus Vds of the device (A) and (C), respectively. Gate voltage Vgs = −10 V.