| Literature DB >> 29735975 |
Taishan Tong1, Chunqin Pei2, Jun Chen2, Qing Lv3, Fuquan Zhang1, Zaohuo Cheng1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy can cause adverse effects such as chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). In this prospective study, the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine acupuncture therapy in relieving CRCI and its impact on serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighty patients were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group with 40 patients in each group. The treatment group was treated at the following acupuncture points: Baihui (DU20), Sishencong (EX-HN1), Shenting (DU24), Zusanli (ST36), Taixi (K13), Dazhong (K14), and Juegu (GB39). Cognitive function was assessed using the functional assessment of cancer treatment cognition test (FACT-COG, version 3), the auditory-verbal learning test (AVLT), the verbal fluency test (VFT), the symbol digit modality test (SDMT), the clock-drawing test (CDT), and the trail-making test part B (TMT-B). In addition, blood serum levels of BDNF were measured before and after treatment. Correlations between change in BDNF levels and cognitive function were also analyzed. RESULTS CRCI was ameliorated in the acupuncture treatment group, with scores on FACT-COG, AVLT-recognition and CDT assessments all significantly increased (P<0.05 in all cases). In addition, serum BDNF levels after acupuncture treatment were significantly higher than before treatment ([i]t[/i]=3.242, [i]P[/i]<0.01). Moreover, the level of BDNF was positively correlated with the total score of FACT-COG, AVLT-recognition, and CDT ([i]r[/i]=0.694, 0.628, and 0.532, respectively; all P<0.05). The control group showed no statistically significant difference in any measures over the same period. CONCLUSIONS Acupuncture therapy is effective in the treatment of CRCI in breast cancer patients through a mechanism that may be related to an increase of BDNF.Entities:
Keywords: Acupuncture - methods; Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor - chemical synthesis; Breast; mild cognitive impairment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29735975 PMCID: PMC5963738 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.909712
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1Flow chart of the study. BT: cognitive-behavior therapy.
Demographic and clinical characteristics.
| Treatment group (n=39) | Control group (n=36) | Paired | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD), years | 43.11±4.23 | 42.26±4.42 | 0.70 | 0.50 |
| TNM stage, No (%) | ||||
| 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | – | – |
| I | 24 (61.5) | 22 (61.1) | – | – |
| II | 15 (38.5) | 14 (38.9) | – | – |
| Surgery method, No (%) | ||||
| Conservative surgery | 8 (20.5) | 7 (19.4) | – | – |
| Mastectomy + SLNB | 20 (51.3) | 18 (50.0) | – | |
| Modify mastectomy | 11 (28.2) | 11 (30.6) | – | – |
| Subtype, No (%) | ||||
| Luminal A (HR/HER2−) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | – | – |
| Luminal B (HR/HER2) | 20 (51.3) | 19 (52.8) | – | – |
| Erb-B2 (HR−/HER2) | 9 (23.1) | 8 (22.2) | – | – |
| Basal-like (HR−/HER2−) | 10 (25.6) | 9 (25.0) | – | – |
| Radiotherapy, No (%) | 12 (30.8) | 11 (30.6) | – | – |
| Hormonal therapy, No (%) | 21 (53.8) | 20 (55.6) | – | – |
| Chemotherapy regimen, No (%) | ||||
| TC | 19 (48.7) | 18 (50.0) | – | – |
| TP | 9 (23.1) | 7 (19.4) | – | – |
| ECx4→Tx4 | 11 (28.2) | 11 (30.6) | – | – |
| T1 to T2, mean (SD), days | 58.94±5.73 | 55.85±4.86 | 1.76 | 0.09 |
| Depression BDI, mean (SD) | 7.81±4.35 | 7.33±4.47 | 0.56 | 0.58 |
| Anxiety S-AI, mean (SD) | 34.91±7.20 | 33.95±6.27 | 2.01 | 0.06 |
| Education, mean (SD), years | 14.26±2.06 | 13.87±2.58 | 0.28 | 0.78 |
| MMSE, mean (SD) | 24.81±1.48 | 25.19±1.72 | 0.84 | 0.41 |
N/A – not applicable; SD – standard deviation; SLNB – sentinel lymph node biopsy; TC – Docetaxel + cyclophosphamide; TP – Paclitaxel + Carboplatin; ECx4→Tx4 – (Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide)×4+Docetaxel×4; BDI – Beck Depression Inventory; S-AI – State Anxiety Inventory; MMSE – Mini-Mental State Examination. P-values are the result of t tests for continuous variables, or Fisher’s Exact test for categorical variables * Statistically significant (p<.05).
Summary of neuropsychologic assessment.
| Metabolites | Treatment (n=39) | Control (n=36) | Repeated measures ANOVA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T value | T1 | T2 | T value | F | P | |
| Mean ±SD | Mean ±SD | Mean ±SD | Mean ±SD | |||||
| FACT-COG | 98.75±12.94 | 102.38±13.78 | 4.840** | 99.60±11.05 | 99.80±10.77 | 1.489 | 5.77 | 0.001 |
| PCI | 55.42±10.95 | 56.29±11.49 | 3.494** | 57.55±8.43 | 57.35±8.99 | 0.721 | 3.21 | 0.027 |
| QOL | 11.33±3.42 | 11.75±3.38 | 2.632* | 11.70±2.41 | 11.55±2.24 | 0.326 | 1.30 | 0.279 |
| OTH | 11.63±2.89 | 12.54±3.31 | 2.991** | 11.10±2.65 | 11.30±1.92 | 1.189 | 0.48 | 0.697 |
| PCA | 20.38±4.19 | 21.79±4.40 | 2.298* | 19.25±3.31 | 19.60±3.33 | 1.285 | 3.75 | 0.014 |
| AVLT1 | 9.13±1.48 | 9.17±1.55 | 0.440 | 9.25±1.55 | 9.50±1.82 | 1.561 | 0.23 | 0.873 |
| AVLT2 | 9.42±1.61 | 9.63±1.50 | 2.005 | 9.45±1.36 | 9.65±1.50 | 1.453 | 0.14 | 0.936 |
| AVLT3 | 10.92±1.44 | 11.42±1.18 | 2.202* | 10.75±1.59 | 10.70±1.49 | 0.357 | 5.21 | 0.002 |
| VFT | 17.88±3.33 | 18.21±3.74 | 1.163 | 18.50±3.38 | 19.15±2.83 | 1.412 | 0.56 | 0.642 |
| SDMT | 34.75±5.15 | 35.71±5.54 | 1.558 | 36.70±5.50 | 38.05±6.62 | 2.077 | 1.33 | 0.269 |
| CDT | 8.08±1.50 | 8.54±1.14 | 2.696* | 8.10±1.21 | 8.05±1.36 | 0.438 | 5.50 | 0.002 |
| TMT-B | 95.58±26.67 | 95.46±26.80 | 0.901 | 92.35±27.06 | 90.40±26.19 | 1.698 | 0.19 | 0.901 |
ANOVA – analysis of variance; FACT-COG – Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function; PCI – perceived cognitive impairments; QOL – impact of perceived impairments on quality of life; OTH – comments from others; PCA – perceived cognitive abilities; AVLT1 – Auditory-Verbal Learning Test – Immediately recall; AVLT2 – Auditory-Verbal Learning Test – Delayed Recall; AVLT3 – Auditory-Verbal Learning Test – recognition; VFT – Verbal Fluency Test; SDMT – Symbol digit modality test; CDT – Clock-Drawing Test; TMT-B – Trail-Making Test part B. Statistically significant * (p<.05, ** p<.01).
Figure 2Levels of BDNF in serum. ** p<.01.
Figure 3Correlation in BDNF changes and cognitive changes (treatment group).