| Literature DB >> 29735955 |
Chi-Ya Huang1, Ting-Feng Yeh2, Fu-Lan Hsu3, Chun-Ya Lin4, Shang-Tzen Chang5, Hui-Ting Chang6.
Abstract
The xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity and thermostability of Cinnamomum osmophloeum leaf oil microencapsulated with β-cyclodextrin were evaluated in this study. The yield of leaf oil microcapsules was 86.3% using the optimal reaction conditions at the leaf oil to β-cyclodextrin ratio of 15:85 and ethanol to water ratio ranging from 1:3 to 1:5. Based on the FTIR analysis, the characteristic absorption bands of major constituent, trans-cinnamaldehyde, were confirmed in the spectra of leaf oil microcapsules. According to the dry-heat aging test, β-cyclodextrin was thermostable under the high temperature conditions, and it was beneficial to reduce the emission of C. osmophloeum leaf oil. Leaf oil microcapsules exhibited high xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity, with an IC50 value of 83.3 µg/mL. It is concluded that the lifetime of C. osmophloeum leaf oil can be effectively improved by microencapsulation, and leaf oil microcapsules possess superior xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity.Entities:
Keywords: Cinnamomum osmophloeum; microencapsulation; trans-cinnamaldehyde; xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity; β-cyclodextrin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29735955 PMCID: PMC6099998 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23051107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Schematic illustration of microencapsulation of C. osmophloeum leaf oil with β-cyclodextrin.
Figure 2Gas chromatogram of cinnamaldehyde-type C. osmophloeum leaf oil.
Composition of Cinnamomum osmophloeum leaf oil.
| Rt (min) * | KI ** | Constituent | Formula | Content (%) | Identification Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.86 | 938 | α-Pinene | C10H16 | 1.09 | MS, KI |
| 6.30 | 955 | Camphene | C10H16 | 0.79 | MS, KI |
| 6.59 | 965 | Benzaldehyde | C7H6O | 7.16 | MS, KI |
| 7.05 | 982 | β-Pinene | C10H16 | 0.36 | MS, KI |
| 8.61 | 1033 | Limonene | C10H16 | 0.21 | MS, KI |
| 12.82 | 1164 | 3-Phenylpropionaldehyde | C9H10O | 3.62 | MS, KI |
| 14.05 | 1198 | Methyl chavicol | C10H12O | 0.55 | MS, KI |
| 14.72 | 1219 | C9H8O | 0.50 | MS, KI | |
| 16.54 | 1273 | C9H8O | 84.13 | MS, KI | |
| 16.96 | 1285 | C12H20O2 | 0.92 | MS, KI | |
| 19.15 | 1351 | Eugenol | C10H12O2 | 0.03 | MS, KI |
| 19.98 | 1376 | α-Copaene | C15H24 | 0.34 | MS, KI |
| 21.40 | 1420 | β-Caryophyllene | C15H24 | 0.29 | MS, KI |
| 24.45 | 1517 | δ-Cadinene | C15H24 | 0.02 | MS, KI |
* RT: Retention time (min); ** KI: Kovats index relative to n-alkanes (C9–C24) on a DB-5MS column.
Yields of trans-cinnamaldehyde and leaf oil microencapsulated with β-cyclodextrin.
| Specimen | Specimen:β-CD ( | EtOH:H2O ( | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0:100 | 1:5 | 0.0 ± 0.0 c * | |
| 10:90 | 1:5 | 68.8 ± 1.1 b | |
| 15:85 | 1:5 | 83.7 ± 0.7 a | |
| 20:80 | 1:5 | 72.8 ± 1.2 b | |
| 25:75 | 1:5 | 70.8 ± 1.5 b | |
| 15:85 | 1:7 | 75.5 ± 1.2 B | |
| 15:85 | 1:5 | 83.7 ± 0.7 A | |
| 15:85 | 1:4 | 85.0 ± 0.9 A | |
| 15:85 | 1:3 | 87.3 ± 1.1 A | |
| 15:85 | 1:2 | 65.0 ± 1.8 C | |
| Leaf oil | 15:85 | 1:3 | 86.3 ± 2.0 |
* Different letters (a–c and A–C) in the table refer to statistically significant differences at the level of p < 0.05 according to Scheffe’s test.
Figure 3Changes in weight of leaf oil microcapsules during the dry-heat aging test. β-CD: β-cyclodextrin; Cin oil: C. osmophloeum leaf oil; β-CD/Cin oil: leaf oil microcapsules; Different letters (a–e) in the Figure refer to statistically significant difference at the level of p < 0.05 according to the Scheffe’s test.
Figure 4FTIR spectra of Cinnamomum osmophloeum leaf oil microcapsules after the dry-heat aging treatment.
Xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity of leaf oil and leaf oil microcapsules.
| Specimen | IC50 (μg/mL) |
|---|---|
| β-CD | — |
| Cin oil | 11.2 ± 0.7 b ** |
| β-CD/Cin oil | 83.3 ± 2.0 a |
| Allopurinol * | 0.5 ± 0.1 c |
Cin oil: C. osmophloeum leaf oil; β-CD/Cin oil: leaf oil microcapsules; —: no effect; * Positive control; ** Different letters (a–c) in the Table refer to statistically significant difference at the level of p < 0.05 according to Scheffe’s test.