Maki Igarashi1, Kentaro Mizuno2, Masafumi Kon1, Satoshi Narumi1, Yoshiyuki Kojima3, Yutaro Hayashi2, Tsutomu Ogata4, Maki Fukami1. 1. Department of Molecular Endocrinology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo 157-8535, Japan. 2. Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan. 3. Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan.
Dear Editor,Disorders of sex development (DSDs) are a group of conditions in which chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex is atypical.1 DSD in genetic males (46, XY DSD) primarily results from impaired androgen production or action or perturbed genital morphogenesis.1 The current understanding of the genetic basis of 46, XY DSD remains fragmentary. For example, although more than 15 genes have been implicated in the development of nonsyndromic hypospadias,2 one of the most common forms of 46, XY DSD,1 mutations in these genes account for <20% of the cases.3GATA-binding protein 4 (GATA4) is a transcription factor involved in cardiac and sexual development.4567 GATA4 harbors two zinc finger domains which mediate the interaction with various proteins such as friend of GATA2/zinc finger protein, multitype 2 (FOG2/ZFPM2) and nuclear receptor subfamily 5, group A, member 1 (NR5A1).45 Known target genes of GATA4 include sex-determining region Y(SRY), SRY box-9 (SOX9), and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) involved in testicular or genital development.45
GATA4 was initially reported as a causative gene for congenital heart anomalies.6 To date, heterozygous GATA4 mutationshave been identified in more than 140 patients with ventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, or other cardiac malformations.7 In 2011, Lourenço et al.8 identified a heterozygous GATA4 missense mutation (p.G221R) in three 46, XY DSD patients from one family. Two of the three patients manifested ambiguous external genitalia with hypospadias and intra-abdominal gonads, and the remaining one patient exhibited male-type genitalia with micropenis and intra-abdominal gonads. The proband had no heart anomaly, whereas the other affected males and two female family members showed various cardiac abnormalities including tetralogy of Fallot. In vitro assays confirmed that the p.G221R mutant protein failed to bind to FOG2 and did not transactivate the Amh promoter. Subsequently, Eggers et al.9 identified two likely pathogenic GATA4 variants (p.P407Q and p.W228C), together with two variants of uncertain significance, in six patients with 46, XY DSD without heart anomalies. These findings suggest that GATA4 mutations can underlie 46, XY DSD without heart malformations. However, there has been no further report of GATA4 sequencing analyses for large 46, XY DSD cohorts, and therefore, the clinical significance of GATA4 mutations as the cause of 46, XY DSD remains uncertain.Here, we performed GATA4 mutation screening for 119 patients with 46, XY DSD without heart anomalies. Patients with additional congenital anomalies, cytogenetically detectable chromosomal abnormalities, or pathogenic mutations in the major known causative genes for 46, XY DSD, androgen receptor (AR), chromobox 2 (CBX2), desert hedgehog (DHH), mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 1 (MAP3K1), NR5A1, SOX9, SRY, steroid 5 alpha-reductase 2 (SRD5A2), Wilms tumor 1 (WT1), and ZFPM2,3 were excluded from the study group. Detailed methods are described in . This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board Committee at the National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan, and performed after obtaining written informed consent. Of the 119 patients, 111 manifested male-type external genitalia with micropenis, cryptorchidism, and/or hypospadias, while the remaining eight presented with ambiguous genitalia. All patients were of Japanese origin. The coding region and splice sites of GATA4 were analyzed using next-generation sequencers. We selected variants whose allele frequencies in Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) Browser (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/; last accessed on 25 September 2017) and the 1000 Genomes Browser (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/tools/1000genomes/; last accessed on 25 September 2017) were both <1.0%. All variants of interest were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and subjected to in silico functional prediction. Furthermore, the transactivating activity of each variant protein was examined by in vitro reporter assays using the Amh promoter. In these assays, the activities of the variants were compared to that of p.G221R, a mutation previously identified in three patients with 46, XY DSD.8 To clarify the frequency of each variant in the Japanese general population, we sequenced DNA samples from 100 unaffected Japanese males. We also analyzed familial samples of variant-positive patients, when possible.SUPPLEMENTARY METHODSClick here for additional data file.As a result, we identified p.R265C (c.793C>T) in one patient (Case 1) and p.P407Q (c.1220C>A) in four patients (Case 2–5) (). Case 1–5 manifested male-type genitalia and hypospadias with and without micropenis and cryptorchidism. The variants were present in a heterozygous state. The p.R265C and p.P407Q variants were extremely rare polymorphisms accounting for 2 of 120 802 and 68 of 121 396 alleles with ExAC Browser, respectively (). In silico analyses scored both variants as deleterious (). The p.R265C variant was predicted to alter the protein structure (). The structural prediction of the p.P407Q variant was unobtainable, because of the lack of information of the C-terminal crystal structure of wild-type GATA4. In vitro assays revealed that p.R265C retained normal transactivation activity, while p.P407Q had markedly decreased activity similar to that of p.G221R (). None of our 100 control individuals carried p.R265C, whereas two had p.P407Q. We also analyzed DNA samples obtained from parents of Case 1–3 and siblings of Case 1 and 2. The variants of Case 1 and 2 were shared by their unaffected fathers, while the variant of Case 3 was identified in the mother. In addition, a younger brother of Case 1 also carried p.R265C. None of the variant-positive relatives of Case 1–3 had heart anomalies.GATA4 variants in Case 1–5. (a) Upper panel: chromatograms of the p.R265C and p.P407Q variants. Arrows indicate mutated nucleotides. Lower panel: protein structure of GATA4. The p.G221R is a previously reported mutation associated with 46,XY DSD. (b) Three-dimensional structure of GATA4 proteins. The structures of wild-type and the p.R265C variant are shown. GATA4 and its target DNA are shown in gold and silver, respectively. Amino acids at the 265th codon are illustrated as rainbow spheroidal shapes. Amino acids at the 284th and 290th positions in C-terminal zinc finger domain are illustrated as gold spheroidal shapes. The wild-type likely interacts with amino acids in the C-terminal zinc finger domain. Color code: red, oxygen; blue, nitrogen; yellow, sulfur; gray, others. (c) Representative results of luciferase assays using the murineAmh promoter. The GATA4 expression vector, with and without the NR5A1 expression vector, was transfected into COS-1 cells. The transactivating activities of the wild-type GATA4 (WT), the p.R265C mutant (R265C), the p.P407Q mutant (P407Q), and the previously reported p.G221R mutant (G211R) were compared with that of the empty expression vector (-). The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. NLS: nuclear location sequence; TAD: transactivation domain; Zn: zinc finger domain.Allele frequencies and in silico functional prediction of GATA4 variantsClick here for additional data file.The aforementioned data raise questions about the causal relationship between the GATA4 variants and 46, XY DSD in our participants. Particularly, p.R265C retained normal in vitro transactivation activity for the Amh promoter and was shared by the unaffected father and brother of Case 1. Hence, although p.R265C is extremely rare in the general population and was predicted to be deleterious by multiple in silico analyses, this variant is unlikely to disrupt sexual development in genetic males. Similarly, p.P407Q seems to be insufficient to cause 46, XY DSD, because this variant was shared by the unaffected father of Case 2 and two of the 100 control males. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that p.P407Q exerts some deleterious effects on male sex development, because this variant showed compromised transactivation activity for the Amh promoter. Notably, this variant has been reported as a pathogenic mutation responsible for tetralogy of Fallot, atrial septal defect, and ventricular septal defect.7 The lack of heart anomalies in Case 2–5 with p.P407Q may reflect incomplete penetrance of heart anomalies resulting from GATA4 mutations,10 although the relatively high frequency of heart anomalies in previously reported cases suggests that developing hearts are more vulnerable to GATA4 dysfunction than developing testes.6Collectively, the results of this study demonstrate that GATA4 mutations are rare in patients with 46, XY DSD without heart anomalies. Further studies such as pull-down assays using FOG2 and NR5A1 antibodies and mutation screening for large patient cohorts are necessary to clarify whether GATA4 variants, including p.P407Q, contribute to the genetic predisposition of 46, XY DSD.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
MI and MF designed this study; KM, YK, YH, and TO participated in the acquisition of patients’ data; MI, MK, and SN conducted the experiments; MI and MF drafted the manuscript; and all authors have reviewed and approved the final version.
Authors: L F M van der Zanden; I A L M van Rooij; W F J Feitz; B Franke; N V A M Knoers; N Roeleveld Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2012-02-26 Impact factor: 15.610
Authors: Diana Lourenço; Raja Brauner; Magda Rybczynska; Claire Nihoul-Fékété; Ken McElreavey; Anu Bashamboo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Kon; E Suzuki; V C Dung; Y Hasegawa; T Mitsui; K Muroya; K Ueoka; N Igarashi; K Nagasaki; Y Oto; T Hamajima; K Yoshino; M Igarashi; Y Kato-Fukui; K Nakabayashi; K Hayashi; K Hata; Y Matsubara; K Moriya; T Ogata; K Nonomura; M Fukami Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Vidu Garg; Irfan S Kathiriya; Robert Barnes; Marie K Schluterman; Isabelle N King; Cheryl A Butler; Caryn R Rothrock; Reenu S Eapen; Kayoko Hirayama-Yamada; Kunitaka Joo; Rumiko Matsuoka; Jonathan C Cohen; Deepak Srivastava Journal: Nature Date: 2003-07-06 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Stefanie Eggers; Simon Sadedin; Jocelyn A van den Bergen; Gorjana Robevska; Thomas Ohnesorg; Jacqueline Hewitt; Luke Lambeth; Aurore Bouty; Ingrid M Knarston; Tiong Yang Tan; Fergus Cameron; George Werther; John Hutson; Michele O'Connell; Sonia R Grover; Yves Heloury; Margaret Zacharin; Philip Bergman; Chris Kimber; Justin Brown; Nathalie Webb; Matthew F Hunter; Shubha Srinivasan; Angela Titmuss; Charles F Verge; David Mowat; Grahame Smith; Janine Smith; Lisa Ewans; Carolyn Shalhoub; Patricia Crock; Chris Cowell; Gary M Leong; Makato Ono; Antony R Lafferty; Tony Huynh; Uma Visser; Catherine S Choong; Fiona McKenzie; Nicholas Pachter; Elizabeth M Thompson; Jennifer Couper; Anne Baxendale; Jozef Gecz; Benjamin J Wheeler; Craig Jefferies; Karen MacKenzie; Paul Hofman; Philippa Carter; Richard I King; Csilla Krausz; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Leendert Looijenga; Sten Drop; Stefan Riedl; Martine Cools; Angelika Dawson; Achmad Zulfa Juniarto; Vaman Khadilkar; Anuradha Khadilkar; Vijayalakshmi Bhatia; Vũ Chí Dũng; Irum Atta; Jamal Raza; Nguyen Thi Diem Chi; Tran Kiem Hao; Vincent Harley; Peter Koopman; Garry Warne; Sultana Faradz; Alicia Oshlack; Katie L Ayers; Andrew H Sinclair Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Sergei G Tevosian; Kenneth H Albrecht; John D Crispino; Yuko Fujiwara; Eva M Eicher; Stuart H Orkin Journal: Development Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 6.868