Literature DB >> 29734971

Characterization of the Correct Mandibular Premolar Region for Delayed Dental Implantation in Beagle Dogs.

Chenxi Xie1, Xiaoming Fu2, Ling Xu3, Sheng Xu4.   

Abstract

For delayed dental implantation into the mandible, the implant size should be chosen according to the characteristics of that bone. This study investigated anatomic features of the mandible in beagle dogs, to develop recommendations regarding the correct implantation region and available bone area for delayed dental implantation surgery. We used 20 healthy male beagle dogs to create delayed dental implantation models. The dogs' mandibles underwent cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging; the locations of the middle mental foramen and canine root apex were measured on CBCT images. The dogs then were euthanized and their mandibles measured by using a digital vernier caliper. In addition, the correct implantation region and available bone areas were evaluated. The data obtained by using the 2 measuring methods were compared statistically. The results showed that the positions of the middle mental foramen and canine root apex were relatively fixed, with little variation. The implantation and available bone regions showed little variation among dogs and did not differ significantly between the 2 measuring methods. In conclusion, the correct implantation region (mean ± 1 SD) in the beagle mandible for delayed dental implantation surgery was 17.53 ± 0.46 mm in width. The recommended available bone areas (height × width) were 7.22 ± 0.68 mm × 5.32 ± 0.49 mm (P2), 8.21 ± 0.71 mm × 5.81 ± 0.56 mm (P3), and 9.17 ± 0.65 mm × 6.39 ± 0.56 mm (P4) in the premolar region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29734971      PMCID: PMC5966240          DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-17-000155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  16 in total

1.  Epiphyseal union at the innominate and lower limb in a modern Portuguese skeletal sample, and age estimation in adolescent and young adult male and female skeletons.

Authors:  Hugo F V Cardoso
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  A quantitative anatomical study on posterior mandibular interradicular safe zones for miniscrew implantation in the beagle.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Wang; Yu Li; Feng Deng; Jinlin Song; Zhihe Zhao
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Localization of the mandibular canal in brachycephalic dogs using computed tomography.

Authors:  Lenin Arturo Villamizar Martinez; Marco Antonio Gioso; Cristian Marcelo Villegas Lobos; Ana Carolina Brandão de C Fonseca Pinto
Journal:  J Vet Dent       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 0.857

Review 4.  Animal Models for Evaluation of Bone Implants and Devices: Comparative Bone Structure and Common Model Uses.

Authors:  L M Wancket
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.221

Review 5.  Experimental model for bone regeneration in oral and cranio-maxillo-facial surgery.

Authors:  Nikos Mardas; Xanthippi Dereka; Nikolaos Donos; Michel Dard
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Histologic evaluation of immediate versus delayed placement of implants after tooth extraction.

Authors:  G Schultes; A Gaggl
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2001-07

7.  Alumina and zirconia coated vitallium oral endosteal implants in beagles.

Authors:  A N Cranin; P A Schnitman; S M Rabkin; E J Onesto
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1975-07

Review 8.  The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research.

Authors:  Johannes C Reichert; Siamak Saifzadeh; Martin E Wullschleger; Devakara R Epari; Michael A Schütz; Georg N Duda; Hanna Schell; Martijn van Griensven; Heinz Redl; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  The evaluation of drug-induced changes in left ventricular function in pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs.

Authors:  Yevgeniya E Koshman; Brett R Herzberg; Terese R Seifert; James S Polakowski; Scott W Mittelstadt
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 1.950

10.  Insight of Dogs' Inner Mandible Anatomy using Mathematical Models.

Authors:  M Santos; L M Carreira
Journal:  Anat Histol Embryol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 1.114

View more
  1 in total

1.  Enhanced Bone Remodeling Effects of Low-Modulus Ti-5Zr-3Sn-5Mo-25Nb Alloy Implanted in the Mandible of Beagle Dogs under Delayed Loading.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Xiaobo Zhong; Xiaoming Fu
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-11-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.