| Literature DB >> 29734663 |
Lucie Valero1,2,3,4,5, Khair Alhareth6,7,8,9, Jenifer Espinoza Romero10,11,12,13,14, Warren Viricel15, Jeanne Leblond16, Audrey Chissey17,18, Hélène Dhotel19,20,21,22, Caroline Roques23,24,25,26, Danielle Campiol Arruda27,28,29,30, Virginie Escriou31,32,33,34, Nathalie Mignet35,36,37,38, Thierry Fournier39,40, Karine Andrieux41,42,43,44.
Abstract
Nanomedicine as a therapeutic approach for pregnancy-related diseases could offer improved treatments for the mother while avoiding side effects for the fetus. In this study, we evaluated the potential of liposomes as carriers for small interfering RNAs to placental cells. Three neutral formulations carrying rhodamine-labelled siRNAs were evaluated on an in vitro model, i.e., human primary villous cytotrophoblasts. siRNA internalization rate from lipoplexes were compared to the one in the presence of the lipofectamine reagent and assessed by confocal microscopy. Results showed cellular internalization of nucleic acid with all three formulations, based on two cationic lipids, either DMAPAP or CSL-3. Moreover, incubation with DMAPAP+AA provided a rate of labelled cells as high as with lipofectamine (53 ± 15% and 44 ± 12%, respectively) while being more biocompatible. The proportion of cells which internalized siRNA were similar when using DMAPAP/DDSTU (16 ± 5%) and CSL-3 (22 ± 5%). This work highlights that liposomes could be a promising approach for gene therapy dedicated to pregnant patients.Entities:
Keywords: liposomes; placenta; primary trophoblast cells; siRNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29734663 PMCID: PMC6099662 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23051085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Characterization of the liposomes and lipoplexes formulations.
| DMAPAP+AA | DMAPAP/DDSTU | CSL-3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liposomes | Lipoplexes | Liposomes | Lipoplexes | Liposomes | Lipoplexes | |
| Mean hydrodynamic diameter (nm) | 104 ± 4 | 121 ± 2 | 72 ± 4 | 86 ± 7 | 170 ± 9 | 317 ± 7 |
| Polydispersity Index | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01 |
| Zeta potential (mV) | 28 ± 4 | −5 ± 2 | 12 ± 5 | −2 ± 0.4 | 31 ± 2 | −2 ± 1 |
| siRNA encapsulation (%) | 100 | 100 | 98 | |||
Figure 1Confocal images comparing siRNA internalization into villous cytotrophoblasts (40×) depending on the formulation (scale bar 10 µm). Nuclei were labelled with DAPI (blue), cytokeratin 7, i.e., cytoskeleton, with Alexa 488 (green), and siRNA with rhodamine (red).
Figure 2Percentage of observed cells internalizing siRNA. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error from values of experiments realized on cells collected from four placentae. Kruskal-Wallis Dunn’s multiple comparison test: lipofectamine vs. control, p < 0.05 (*); DMAPAP+AA vs. control, p < 0.05 (*); DMAPAP/DDSTU and CSL-3 vs. control, non-significant.