Jasmine Rossi-deVries1, Valentina Pedoia1, Michael A Samaan1,2, Adam R Ferguson3,4, Richard B Souza1,2, Sharmila Majumdar1. 1. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. 2. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. 3. Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. 4. San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a multifaceted disease with many variables affecting diagnosis and progression. Topological data analysis (TDA) is a state-of-the-art big data analytics tool that can combine all variables into multidimensional space. TDA is used to simultaneously analyze imaging and gait analysis techniques. PURPOSE: To identify biochemical and biomechanical biomarkers able to classify different disease progression phenotypes in subjects with and without radiographic signs of hip OA. STUDY TYPE: Longitudinal study for comparison of progressive and nonprogressive subjects. POPULATION: In all, 102 subjects with and without radiographic signs of hip osteoarthritis. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T, SPGR 3D MAPSS T1ρ /T2 , intermediate-weighted fat-suppressed fast spin-echo (FSE). ASSESSMENT: Multidimensional data analysis including cartilage composition, bone shape, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification of osteoarthritis, scoring hip osteoarthritis with MRI (SHOMRI), hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS). STATISTICAL TESTS: Analysis done using TDA, Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) testing, and Benjamini-Hochberg to rank P-value results to correct for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Subjects in the later stages of the disease had an increased SHOMRI score (P < 0.0001), increased KL (P = 0.0012), and older age (P < 0.0001). Subjects in the healthier group showed intact cartilage and less pain. Subjects found between these two groups had a range of symptoms. Analysis of this subgroup identified knee biomechanics (P < 0.0001) as an initial marker of the disease that is noticeable before the morphological progression and degeneration. Further analysis of an OA subgroup with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) showed anterior labral tears to be the most significant marker (P = 0.0017) between those FAI subjects with and without OA symptoms. DATA CONCLUSION: The data-driven analysis obtained with TDA proposes new phenotypes of these subjects that partially overlap with the radiographic-based classical disease status classification and also shows the potential for further examination of an early onset biomechanical intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:1046-1058.
BACKGROUND:Osteoarthritis (OA) is a multifaceted disease with many variables affecting diagnosis and progression. Topological data analysis (TDA) is a state-of-the-art big data analytics tool that can combine all variables into multidimensional space. TDA is used to simultaneously analyze imaging and gait analysis techniques. PURPOSE: To identify biochemical and biomechanical biomarkers able to classify different disease progression phenotypes in subjects with and without radiographic signs of hip OA. STUDY TYPE: Longitudinal study for comparison of progressive and nonprogressive subjects. POPULATION: In all, 102 subjects with and without radiographic signs of hip osteoarthritis. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T, SPGR 3D MAPSS T1ρ /T2 , intermediate-weighted fat-suppressed fast spin-echo (FSE). ASSESSMENT: Multidimensional data analysis including cartilage composition, bone shape, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification of osteoarthritis, scoring hip osteoarthritis with MRI (SHOMRI), hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS). STATISTICAL TESTS: Analysis done using TDA, Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) testing, and Benjamini-Hochberg to rank P-value results to correct for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Subjects in the later stages of the disease had an increased SHOMRI score (P < 0.0001), increased KL (P = 0.0012), and older age (P < 0.0001). Subjects in the healthier group showed intact cartilage and less pain. Subjects found between these two groups had a range of symptoms. Analysis of this subgroup identified knee biomechanics (P < 0.0001) as an initial marker of the disease that is noticeable before the morphological progression and degeneration. Further analysis of an OA subgroup with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) showed anterior labral tears to be the most significant marker (P = 0.0017) between those FAI subjects with and without OA symptoms. DATA CONCLUSION: The data-driven analysis obtained with TDA proposes new phenotypes of these subjects that partially overlap with the radiographic-based classical disease status classification and also shows the potential for further examination of an early onset biomechanical intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:1046-1058.
Authors: Hans Liebl; Gabby Joseph; Michael C Nevitt; Nathan Singh; Ursula Heilmeier; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Pia M Jungmann; Charles E McCulloch; John A Lynch; Nancy E Lane; Thomas M Link Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: M T Nieminen; J Rieppo; J Töyräs; J M Hakumäki; J Silvennoinen; M M Hyttinen; H J Helminen; J S Jurvelin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: R B Souza; D Kumar; N Calixto; J Singh; J Schooler; K Subburaj; X Li; T M Link; S Majumdar Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Lucas A Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Brandon B Park; Gregory J Stoddard; Jill A Erickson; Julia R Crim Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: M C Gallo; C Wyatt; V Pedoia; D Kumar; S Lee; L Nardo; T M Link; R B Souza; S Majumdar Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Jessica L Nielson; Jesse Paquette; Aiwen W Liu; Cristian F Guandique; C Amy Tovar; Tomoo Inoue; Karen-Amanda Irvine; John C Gensel; Jennifer Kloke; Tanya C Petrossian; Pek Y Lum; Gunnar E Carlsson; Geoffrey T Manley; Wise Young; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan; Adam R Ferguson Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Radhika Tibrewala; Emma Bahroos; Hatef Mehrabian; Sarah C Foreman; Thomas M Link; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 3.494