Literature DB >> 29734177

Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol.

Stefano Luzzago1,2, Gennaro Musi1, Michele Catellani1,2, Andrea Russo1, Ettore Di Trapani1, Francesco Alessandro Mistretta1,2, Roberto Bianchi1, Gabriele Cozzi1, Andrea Conti1,2, Paola Pricolo3, Matteo Ferro1, Deliu-Victor Matei1, Vincenzo Mirone4, Giuseppe Petralia3, Ottavio de Cobelli1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of confirmatory multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate at the time of Active Surveillance (AS) enrollment to reduce disease misclassification. MATERIALS: From 2012 to 2016, 383 patients with low-risk disease respecting Prostate Cancer Research International AS criteria underwent confirmatory 1.5-T mpMRI. AS was proposed to patients with Prostate Imaging and Report and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≤3 and no extraprostatic extension (EPE), whereas patients with PI-RADS score ≥4 and/or EPE were treated actively. Kaplan-Meier analyses quantified progression-free survival (PFS) in patients enrolled in the AS program. Logistic regression analyses tested the association between confirmatory mpMRI and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) at radical prostatectomy (RP). Diagnostic performance of mpMRI was calculated in patients submitted to immediate RP.
RESULTS: PFS rate was 99, 90 and 86% at 1, 2 and 3 years respectively. At multivariable analysis, PI-RADS 3, PI-RADS 4, PI-RADS 5 and EPE increased the probability of having csPCa at immediate RP (PI-RADS 3 [OR] 1.2, p = 0.26; PI-RADS 4 [OR] 5.1, p = 0.02; PI-RADS 5 [OR] 6.7; p = 0.009; EPE [OR] 11.8, p < 0.001). Confirmatory mpMRI showed sensibility, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 85, 55, 68 and 76% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: MpMRI at the time of AS enrollment reduces the misclassification rate of csPCa. We suggest to perform target biopsies in patients with PI-RADS score 3 and 4 lesions.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active Surveillance; Disease misclassification; Extraprostatic extension; Low risk prostate cancer; Multiparametric magnetic resonance; Prostate Imaging and Report and Data System score

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29734177     DOI: 10.1159/000488772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  8 in total

1.  Best of the 2018 AUA Annual Meeting.

Authors:  Zeyad R Schwen; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

2.  Current Role of Multiparametric MRI and MRI Targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Germany: A Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Matthias Saar; Johannes Linxweiler; Angelika Borkowetz; Sebastian Fussek; Katerina Urbanova; Laura Bellut; Glen Kristiansen; Bernd Wullich
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Impact of PI-RADS Category 3 lesions on the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting prostate cancer and the prevalence of prostate cancer within each PI-RADS category: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Akshay Wadera; Mostafa Alabousi; Alex Pozdnyakov; Mohammed Kashif Al-Ghita; Ali Jafri; Matthew Df McInnes; Nicola Schieda; Christian B van der Pol; Jean-Paul Salameh; Lucy Samoilov; Kaela Gusenbauer; Abdullah Alabousi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: the next step forward!

Authors:  Emanuel Darius Cata; Iulia Andras; Teodora Telecan; Attila Tamas-Szora; Radu-Tudor Coman; Dan-Vasile Stanca; Ioan Coman; Nicolae Crisan
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2021-04-29

Review 5.  Old men with prostate cancer have higher risk of Gleason score upgrading and pathological upstaging after initial diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Wang; Yu Zhang; Zhengguo Ji; Peiqian Yang; Ye Tian
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Predicting Insignificant Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the Pathological Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance according to the Pre-International Society of Urological Pathology (Pre-ISUP) 2014 Era Versus the Post-ISUP2014 Era.

Authors:  Mun Su Chung; Nam Hoon Cho; Jinu Kim; Youngheun Jo; Byung Il Yoon; Seung Hwan Lee
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.400

7.  Association between previous negative biopsies and lower rates of progression during active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mattia Luca Piccinelli; Stefano Luzzago; Giulia Marvaso; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Noriyoshi Miura; Victor M Schuettfort; Keiichiro Mori; Alberto Colombo; Matteo Ferro; Francesco A Mistretta; Nicola Fusco; Giuseppe Petralia; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Shahrokh F Shariat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Ottavio de Cobelli; Gennaro Musi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Serum miRNAs Support the Indication for MRI-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy of the Prostate in Patients with Low-PI-RADS Lesions.

Authors:  Bastian Keck; Angelika Borkowetz; Julia Poellmann; Thilo Jansen; Moritz Fischer; Susanne Fuessel; Andreas Kahlmeyer; Manfred Wirth; Johannes Huber; Alexander Cavallaro; Matthias Hammon; Ivan Platzek; Arndt Hartmann; Gustavo Baretton; Frank Kunath; Danijel Sikic; Helge Taubert; Bernd Wullich; Kati Erdmann; Sven Wach
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 6.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.