Literature DB >> 29734067

Occurrence, characteristics and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in arable soils of Beijing, China.

Hang Liu1, Xiaolu Yu1, Zirui Liu2, Ying Sun3.   

Abstract

This study investigated the occurrence and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from arable soils in Beijing and compared them with 4 other types of soils: soil from uncultivated land, an incineration plant, a suburb and a woodland. The total concentrations of PAHs ranged from 189.3 to 888.7 μg/kg (mean: 518.2 μg/kg for greenhouses and 455.2 μg/kg for fields). The seven carcinogenic PAHs accounted for 11.2-81.3% of Σ15PAHs in arable soils. Benzo[a]pyrene toxic equivalent (BaPeq) concentrations were 82.8 μg/kg and 85.4 μg/kg in greenhouses and fields, respectively. Greenhouses and fields were both dominated by PAHs with 3 and 4 rings. Acenaphthene (ACE), indeno[1,2,3-cd] pyrene (IcdP) and benzo[ghi]perylene (BghiP) were the major compounds. These results showed that there was insignificant difference between the soil from greenhouses and fields and both had low carcinogenic potential risk. The diagnostic ratios suggested that the arable soils were mainly contaminated by coal/biomass combustion. Based on a positive matrix factorization (PMF) model, six sources were identified including coal combustion, waste incineration, tar, diesel combustion, biomass burning and gasoline combustion. Coal and gasoline combustion contributed over 40% of the measured PAHs in arable soils. Diesel combustion, tar and waste incineration were the main sources of pollution for soil from the uncultivated land, woodland and incineration plant/suburban. It was concluded that PMF was effective in determining the source apportionment. Urbanization and the evolution of human activities have caused PAH sources to become more complicated in industrial areas compared to regions with little human disturbance. Because of this, various factors need to be considered to control the PAH contamination in arable soils.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arable soils; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Positive matrix factorization; Source identification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29734067     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.04.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  4 in total

1.  Concentration and Potential Ecological Risk of PAHs in Different Layers of Soil in the Petroleum-Contaminated Areas of the Loess Plateau, China.

Authors:  Di Wang; Jing Ma; Hao Li; Xingchang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Coupling Genome-wide Transcriptomics and Developmental Toxicity Profiles in Zebrafish to Characterize Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Hazard.

Authors:  Prarthana Shankar; Mitra C Geier; Lisa Truong; Ryan S McClure; Paritosh Pande; Katrina M Waters; Robert L Tanguay
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Source identification and toxicity apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface soils in Beijing and Tianjin using a PMF-TEQ method.

Authors:  Huashuang Zhang; Qi Huang; Ping Han; Zhicheng Zhang; Shengtao Jiang; Wei Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Distribution, Origins and Hazardous Effects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Topsoil Surrounding Oil Fields: A Case Study on the Loess Plateau, China.

Authors:  Di Wang; Shilei Zhu; Lijing Wang; Qing Zhen; Fengpeng Han; Xingchang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.