Literature DB >> 29733956

Patterns of thought: Population variation in the associations between large-scale network organisation and self-reported experiences at rest.

Hao-Ting Wang1, Danilo Bzdok2, Daniel Margulies3, Cameron Craddock4, Michael Milham4, Elizabeth Jefferies5, Jonathan Smallwood5.   

Abstract

Contemporary cognitive neuroscience recognises unconstrained processing varies across individuals, describing variation in meaningful attributes, such as intelligence. It may also have links to patterns of on-going experience. This study examined whether dimensions of population variation in different modes of unconstrained processing can be described by the associations between patterns of neural activity and self-reports of experience during the same period. We selected 258 individuals from a publicly available data set who had measures of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging, and self-reports of experience during the scan. We used machine learning to determine patterns of association between the neural and self-reported data, finding variation along four dimensions. 'Purposeful' experiences were associated with lower connectivity - in particular default mode and limbic networks were less correlated with attention and sensorimotor networks. 'Emotional' experiences were associated with higher connectivity, especially between limbic and ventral attention networks. Experiences focused on themes of 'personal importance' were associated with reduced functional connectivity within attention and control systems. Finally, visual experiences were associated with stronger connectivity between visual and other networks, in particular the limbic system. Some of these patterns had contrasting links with cognitive function as assessed in a separate laboratory session - purposeful thinking was linked to greater intelligence and better abstract reasoning, while a focus on personal importance had the opposite relationship. Together these findings are consistent with an emerging literature on unconstrained states and also underlines that these states are heterogeneous, with distinct modes of population variation reflecting the interplay of different large-scale networks.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29733956     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

1.  Dynamic brain network configurations during rest and an attention task with frequent occurrence of mind wandering.

Authors:  Ekaterina Denkova; Jason S Nomi; Lucina Q Uddin; Amishi P Jha
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  How to Interpret Resting-State fMRI: Ask Your Participants.

Authors:  Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Julia W Y Kam; Colin W Hoy; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Approaches to Defining Common and Dissociable Neurobiological Deficits Associated With Psychopathology in Youth.

Authors:  Antonia N Kaczkurkin; Tyler M Moore; Aristeidis Sotiras; Cedric Huchuan Xia; Russell T Shinohara; Theodore D Satterthwaite
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Interactions between the neural correlates of dispositional internally directed thought and visual imagery.

Authors:  Theodoros Karapanagiotidis; Elizabeth Jefferies; Jonathan Smallwood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The neural correlates of ongoing conscious thought.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; Adam Turnbull; Hao-Ting Wang; Nerissa S P Ho; Giulia L Poerio; Theodoros Karapanagiotidis; Delali Konu; Brontë Mckeown; Meichao Zhang; Charlotte Murphy; Deniz Vatansever; Danilo Bzdok; Mahiko Konishi; Robert Leech; Paul Seli; Jonathan W Schooler; Boris Bernhardt; Daniel S Margulies; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-02-01

6.  Facing up to the wandering mind: Patterns of off-task laboratory thought are associated with stronger neural recruitment of right fusiform cortex while processing facial stimuli.

Authors:  Nerissa Siu Ping Ho; Giulia Poerio; Delali Konu; Adam Turnbull; Mladen Sormaz; Robert Leech; Boris Bernhardt; Elizabeth Jefferies; Jonathan Smallwood
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-22       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Neurocognitive patterns dissociating semantic processing from executive control are linked to more detailed off-task mental time travel.

Authors:  Hao-Ting Wang; Nerissa Siu Ping Ho; Danilo Bzdok; Boris C Bernhardt; Daniel S Margulies; Elizabeth Jefferies; Jonathan Smallwood
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Multiple Holdouts With Stability: Improving the Generalizability of Machine Learning Analyses of Brain-Behavior Relationships.

Authors:  Agoston Mihalik; Fabio S Ferreira; Michael Moutoussis; Gabriel Ziegler; Rick A Adams; Maria J Rosa; Gita Prabhu; Leticia de Oliveira; Mirtes Pereira; Edward T Bullmore; Peter Fonagy; Ian M Goodyer; Peter B Jones; John Shawe-Taylor; Raymond Dolan; Janaina Mourão-Miranda
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Knowing what you need to know in advance: The neural processes underpinning flexible semantic retrieval of thematic and taxonomic relations.

Authors:  Meichao Zhang; Dominika Varga; Xiuyi Wang; Katya Krieger-Redwood; Andre Gouws; Jonathan Smallwood; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 6.556

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.