Literature DB >> 29733895

Protein-peptide docking: opportunities and challenges.

Maciej Ciemny1, Mateusz Kurcinski2, Karol Kamel3, Andrzej Kolinski2, Nawsad Alam4, Ora Schueler-Furman4, Sebastian Kmiecik5.   

Abstract

Peptides have recently attracted much attention as promising drug candidates. Rational design of peptide-derived therapeutics usually requires structural characterization of the underlying protein-peptide interaction. Given that experimental characterization can be difficult, reliable computational tools are needed. In recent years, a variety of approaches have been developed for 'protein-peptide docking', that is, predicting the structure of the protein-peptide complex, starting from the protein structure and the peptide sequence, including variable degrees of information about the peptide binding site and/or conformation. In this review, we provide an overview of protein-peptide docking methods and outline their capabilities, limitations, and applications in structure-based drug design. Key challenges are also briefly discussed, such as modeling of large-scale conformational changes upon binding, scoring of predicted models, and optimal inclusion of varied types of experimental data and theoretical predictions into an integrative modeling process.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29733895     DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Discov Today        ISSN: 1359-6446            Impact factor:   7.851


  40 in total

1.  Extensive benchmark of rDock as a peptide-protein docking tool.

Authors:  Daniel Soler; Yvonne Westermaier; Robert Soliva
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  AutoDock CrankPep: combining folding and docking to predict protein-peptide complexes.

Authors:  Yuqi Zhang; Michel F Sanner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  MDockPeP: An ab-initio protein-peptide docking server.

Authors:  Xianjin Xu; Chengfei Yan; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Peptide Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (Pep-GaMD): Enhanced sampling and free energy and kinetics calculations of peptide binding.

Authors:  Jinan Wang; Yinglong Miao
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Challenges in protein docking.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Flexible docking of peptides to proteins using CABS-dock.

Authors:  Mateusz Kurcinski; Aleksandra Badaczewska-Dawid; Michal Kolinski; Andrzej Kolinski; Sebastian Kmiecik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Interactive Molecular Dynamics in Virtual Reality Is an Effective Tool for Flexible Substrate and Inhibitor Docking to the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease.

Authors:  Helen M Deeks; Rebecca K Walters; Jonathan Barnoud; David R Glowacki; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  PepPro: A Nonredundant Structure Data Set for Benchmarking Peptide-Protein Computational Docking.

Authors:  Xianjin Xu; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Protein-peptide docking using CABS-dock and contact information.

Authors:  Maciej Blaszczyk; Maciej Pawel Ciemny; Andrzej Kolinski; Mateusz Kurcinski; Sebastian Kmiecik
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 11.622

10.  Molecular Dynamics Scoring of Protein-Peptide Models Derived from Coarse-Grained Docking.

Authors:  Mateusz Zalewski; Sebastian Kmiecik; Michał Koliński
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.