Literature DB >> 2973381

A reassessment of Holt's data on: "The question of lumbar discography".

J W Simmons1, C N Aprill, A P Dwyer, A E Brodsky.   

Abstract

This paper is a detailed critique of Holt's study entitled "The Question of Lumbar Discography." His finding of a 37% false positive rate in asymptomatic volunteers has been used to discredit lumbar discography as a valid diagnostic study in the investigation of low back pain patients with nonprolapsing disc disease of the lumbar spine. The authors show why Holt's paper should no longer be used as scientific and authoritative evidence against the use of discography by today's standards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2973381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  6 in total

1.  Diskography: science and the ad hoc hypothesis.

Authors:  M T Modic
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Discography: A Review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

Review 3.  Discography.

Authors:  S R Anderson; B Flanagan
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

Review 4.  Diagnostic discography: what is the clinical utility?

Authors:  David A Provenzano
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-02

5.  Clinical predictors of lumbar provocation discography: a study of clinical predictors of lumbar provocation discography.

Authors:  Mark Laslett; Charles N Aprill; Barry McDonald; Birgitta Oberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Discography in practice: a clinical and historical review.

Authors:  Joseph Walker; Omar El Abd; Zacharia Isaac; Stefan Muzin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2008-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.