Literature DB >> 29732939

Development of a systematic method to assess similarity between nanomaterials for human hazard evaluation purposes - lessons learnt.

Margriet Vdz Park1, Julia Catalán2,3, Natalia Ferraz4, Joan Cabellos5, Ralph Vanhauten6, Socorro Vázquez-Campos5, Gemma Janer5.   

Abstract

Within the EU FP-7 GUIDEnano project, a methodology was developed to systematically quantify the similarity between a nanomaterial (NM) that has been tested in toxicity studies and the NM for which risk needs to be evaluated, for the purpose of extrapolating toxicity data between the two materials. The methodology is a first attempt to use current knowledge on NM property-hazard relationships to develop a series of pragmatic and systematic rules for assessing NM similarity. Moreover, the methodology takes into account the practical feasibility, in that it is based on generally available NM characterization information. In addition to presenting this methodology, the lessons learnt and the challenges faced during its development are reported here. We conclude that there is a large gap between the information that is ideally needed and its application to real cases. The current database on property-hazard relationships is still very limited, which hinders the agreement on the key NM properties constituting the basis of the similarity assessment and the development of associated science-based and unequivocal rules. Currently, one of the most challenging NM properties to systematically assess in terms of similarity between two NMs is surface coating and functionalization, which lacks standardized parameters for description and characterization methodology. Standardization of characterization methods that lead to quantitative, unambiguous, and measurable parameters describing NM properties are necessary in order to build a sufficiently robust property-hazard database that allows for evidence-based refinement of our methodology, or any other attempt to systematically assess the similarity of NMs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Similarity; nanoforms; nanomaterials; physicochemical properties; read-across; risk assessment; shape; size; surface chemistry; toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29732939     DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2018.1465142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanotoxicology        ISSN: 1743-5390            Impact factor:   5.913


  5 in total

1.  Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation.

Authors:  Panagiotis Isigonis; Danail Hristozov; Christina Benighaus; Elisa Giubilato; Khara Grieger; Lisa Pizzol; Elena Semenzin; Igor Linkov; Alex Zabeo; Antonio Marcomini
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 2.  Hazard Assessment of Polymeric Nanobiomaterials for Drug Delivery: What Can We Learn From Literature So Far.

Authors:  Sandra Jesus; Mélanie Schmutz; Claudia Som; Gerrit Borchard; Peter Wick; Olga Borges
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-10-23

3.  Surface functionalization and size modulate the formation of reactive oxygen species and genotoxic effects of cellulose nanofibrils.

Authors:  Kukka Aimonen; Monireh Imani; Mira Hartikainen; Satu Suhonen; Esa Vanhala; Carlos Moreno; Orlando J Rojas; Hannu Norppa; Julia Catalán
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 9.400

4.  In Vitro Biological Impact of Nanocellulose Fibers on Human Gut Bacteria and Gastrointestinal Cells.

Authors:  Viviana R Lopes; Maria Strømme; Natalia Ferraz
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 5.  Nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity testing of nanomedicinal products: Proposed strategy and possible pitfalls.

Authors:  Christina Giannakou; Margriet V D Z Park; Irene E M Bosselaers; Wim H de Jong; Jan Willem van der Laan; Henk van Loveren; Rob J Vandebriel; Robert E Geertsma
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-04-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.