Literature DB >> 29732483

Feasibility and accessibility of electronic patient-reported outcome measures using a smartphone during routine chemotherapy: a pilot study.

Woo Kyun Bae1, Jihyun Kwon2, Hyun Woo Lee3, Sang-Cheol Lee4, Eun-Kee Song5, Hyeok Shim6, Keun Ho Ryu7, Jemin Song8, Sungbo Seo8, Yaewon Yang2, Jong-Hyock Park9, Ki Hyeong Lee2,10, Hye Sook Han11,12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is growing interest in integrating electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures into routine oncology practice for symptom monitoring. Here, we evaluated the feasibility and accessibility of electronic PRO measures using a smartphone (PRO-SMART) for cancer patients receiving routine chemotherapy.
METHODS: The proposed PRO-SMART application obtains daily personal health record (PHR) data from cancer patients via a smartphone. An analysis report of cumulative PHR data is provided to the clinician in a format suitable for upload to electronic medical records (EMRs). Cancer outpatients who had received at least two cycles of chemotherapy and who were scheduled for two more cycles were enrolled.
RESULTS: Between February 2015 and December 2016, 111 patients were screened and 101 of these were included. One-hundred patients used PRO-SMART at least once and were included in the final analysis (90.1% overall accessibility among all screened patients). The number of symptomatic adverse events (AEs) related to chemotherapy recorded in EMRs (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) increased from 0.92 ± 0.80 to 2.26 ± 1.80 (P < 0.001), and grading of AEs increased from 0.81 ± 0.69 to 1.00 ± 0.62 (P = 0.029). After using PRO-SMART, the numeric rating scale for pain (mean ± SD) increased from 0.20 ± 0.72 to 0.99 ± 1.55 (P < 0.001). A patient-reported questionnaire revealed that 64.2% of patients found it useful and 83% found it easy to use.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the proposed PRO-SMART is feasible and accessible for assessment of symptomatic AEs in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy for a prospective randomized trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Chemotherapy; Patient-reported outcome measures; Smartphone; Symptom

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29732483     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4232-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  26 in total

1.  Predictors and outcomes of feeling of insufficient consultation time in cancer care in Korea: results of a nationwide multicenter survey.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Jae-Hyun Park; Eun-Jung Shim; Myung-Il Hahm; Jong-Hyock Park; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Smartphone Applications for Hypertension Management: a Potential Game-Changer That Needs More Control.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Camilla Torlasco; Stefano Omboni; Dario Pellegrini
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice.

Authors:  Antonia V Bennett; Roxanne E Jensen; Ethan Basch
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Health resource consumption and costs attributable to chemotherapy-induced toxicity in German routine hospital care in lymphoproliferative disorder and NSCLC patients.

Authors:  B J Paessens; C von Schilling; K Berger; M Shlaen; C Müller-Thomas; R Bernard; C Peschel; A Ihbe-Heffinger
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials.

Authors:  Grigorios Kotronoulas; Nora Kearney; Roma Maguire; Alison Harrow; David Di Domenico; Suzanne Croy; Stephen MacGillivray
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review.

Authors:  Santosh Krishna; Suzanne Austin Boren; E Andrew Balas
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.536

8.  Nurse's perceptions and experiences of using of a mobile-phone-based Advanced Symptom Management System (ASyMS) to monitor and manage chemotherapy-related toxicity.

Authors:  R Maguire; L McCann; M Miller; N Kearney
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 2.398

9.  DialBetics: A Novel Smartphone-based Self-management Support System for Type 2 Diabetes Patients.

Authors:  Kayo Waki; Hideo Fujita; Yuji Uchimura; Koji Omae; Eiji Aramaki; Shigeko Kato; Hanae Lee; Haruka Kobayashi; Takashi Kadowaki; Kazuhiko Ohe
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-13

Review 10.  The association between clinician-based common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO): a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Sean J Ryan; Antonia V Bennett; Angela M Stover; Rebecca M Saracino; Lauren J Rogak; Sarah T Jewell; Konstantina Matsoukas; Yuelin Li; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.603

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The increasing value of eHealth in the delivery of patient-centred cancer care.

Authors:  Frank J Penedo; Laura B Oswald; Joshua P Kronenfeld; Sofia F Garcia; David Cella; Betina Yanez
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  Big Data From Small Devices: The Future of Smartphones in Oncology.

Authors:  Juhi M Purswani; Adam P Dicker; Colin E Champ; Matt Cantor; Nitin Ohri
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.934

3.  Mobile App Intervention on Reducing the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Burden: Pilot Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

Authors:  Hninyee Win; Samantha Russell; Betsy C Wertheim; Victoria Maizes; Robert Crocker; Audrey J Brooks; Ruben Mesa; Jennifer Huberty; Holly Geyer; Ryan Eckert; Ashley Larsen; Krisstina Gowin
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-03-31

4.  Smartphone App to Self-Monitor Nausea During Pediatric Chemotherapy Treatment: User-Centered Design Process.

Authors:  Astrid Eliasen; Mikkel Kramme Abildtoft; Niels Steen Krogh; Catherine Rechnitzer; Jesper Sune Brok; René Mathiasen; Kjeld Schmiegelow; Kim Peder Dalhoff
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Using Electronic Data Collection Platforms to Assess Complementary and Integrative Health Patient-Reported Outcomes: Feasibility Project.

Authors:  Jolie N Haun; Amy C Alman; Christine Melillo; Maisha Standifer; Julie McMahon-Grenz; Marlena Shin; W A Lapcevic; Nitin Patel; A Rani Elwy
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2020-06-26

6.  Benefits of Mobile Apps for Cancer Pain Management: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caiyun Zheng; Xu Chen; Jing Yang; Lizhu Weng; Ling Guo; Haiting Xu; Meimei Lin; Yan Xue; Xiuqin Lin; Aiqin Yang; Lili Yu; Zenggui Xue
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 7.  Acceptance and Use of Home-Based Electronic Symptom Self-Reporting Systems in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Youmin Cho; Yun Jiang; Huiting Zhang; Marcelline Ruth Harris; Yang Gong; Ellen Lavoie Smith
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Examining the Feasibility of an Application-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Monitoring for Breast Cancer Patients: A Pretest for the PRO B Study.

Authors:  Anna Maria Hage; Pimrapat Gebert; Friedrich Kühn; Therese Pross; Ulrike Grittner; Maria Margarete Karsten
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Who is more likely to adopt and comply with the electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) mobile application? A real-world study with cancer patients undergoing active treatment.

Authors:  Mangyeong Lee; Danbee Kang; Sooyeon Kim; Jihyun Lim; Junghee Yoon; Youngha Kim; Sungkeun Shim; Eunji Kang; Jin Seok Ahn; Juhee Cho; Soo-Yong Shin; Dongryul Oh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Patient reported outcome measures in a large cohort of patients with type 1 Gaucher disease.

Authors:  Tama Dinur; Majdolen Istaiti; Dafna Frydman; Michal Becker-Cohen; Jeff Szer; Ari Zimran; Shoshana Revel-Vilk
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.123

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.