Literature DB >> 29732478

Willingness to Pay for Conservation of Transborder Migratory Species: A Case Study of the Mexican Free-Tailed Bat in the United States and Mexico.

Michelle A Haefele1, John B Loomis2, Robert Merideth3, Aaron Lien4, Darius J Semmens5, James Dubovsky6, Ruscena Wiederholt7, Wayne E Thogmartin8, Ta-Ken Huang4, Gary McCracken9, Rodrigo A Medellin10, James E Diffendorfer5, Laura López-Hoffman3,4.   

Abstract

We estimated U.S. and Mexican citizens' willingness to pay (WTP) for protecting habitat for a transborder migratory species, the Mexican free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis mexicana), using the contingent valuation method. Few contingent valuation surveys have evaluated whether households in one country would pay to protect habitat in another country. This study addresses that gap. In our study, Mexican respondents were asked about their WTP for conservation of Mexican free-tailed bat habitat in Mexico and in the United States. Similarly, U.S. respondents were asked about their WTP for conservation in the United States and in Mexico. U.S. households would pay $30 annually to protect habitat in the United States and $24 annually to protect habitat in Mexico. Mexican households would pay $8 annually to protect habitat in Mexico and $5 annually to protect habitat in the United States. In both countries, these WTP amounts rose significantly for increasing the size of the bat population rather than simply stabilizing the current bat population. The ratio of Mexican household WTP relative to U.S. household WTP is nearly identical to that of Mexican household income relative to U.S. household income. This suggests that the perceived economic benefits received from the bats is similar in Mexico and the United States, and that scaling WTP by relative income in international benefit transfer may be plausible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bats; Contingent valuation; Habitat; Mexico; United States; Willingness to pay

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29732478     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1046-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  4 in total

1.  Ecology. Direct payments to conserve biodiversity.

Authors:  Paul J Ferraro; Agnes Kiss
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Conservation. Economic importance of bats in agriculture.

Authors:  Justin G Boyles; Paul M Cryan; Gary F McCracken; Thomas H Kunz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Brazilian free-tailed bats as insect pest regulators in transgenic and conventional cotton crops.

Authors:  Paula Federico; Thomas G Hallam; Gary F McCracken; S Thomas Purucker; William E Grant; A Nelly Correa-Sandoval; John K Westbrook; Rodrigo A Medellin; Cutler J Cleveland; Chris G Sansone; Juan D López; Margrit Betke; Arnulfo Moreno-Valdez; Thomas H Kunz
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Market forces and technological substitutes cause fluctuations in the value of bat pest-control services for cotton.

Authors:  Laura López-Hoffman; Ruscena Wiederholt; Chris Sansone; Kenneth J Bagstad; Paul Cryan; Jay E Diffendorfer; Joshua Goldstein; Kelsie Lasharr; John Loomis; Gary McCracken; Rodrigo A Medellín; Amy Russell; Darius Semmens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.