| Literature DB >> 29732008 |
Marco Rossi1, Cirino Botta1, Mariamena Arbitrio1, Rosa Daniela Grembiale2, Pierosandro Tagliaferri1, Pierfrancesco Tassone1,3.
Abstract
Murine models of human multiple myeloma (MM) are key tools for the study of disease biology as well as for investigation and selection of novel candidate therapeutics for clinical translation. In the last years, a variety of pre-clinical models have been generated to recapitulate a wide spectrum of biological features of MM. These systems range from spontaneous or transgenic models of murine MM, to subcutaneous or orthothopic xenografts of human MM cell lines in immune compromised animals, to platform allowing the engraftment of primary/bone marrow-dependent MM cells within a human bone marrow milieu to fully recapitulate human disease. Selecting the right model for specific pre-clinical research is essential for the successful completion of investigation. We here review recent and most known pre-clinical murine, transgenic and humanized models of MM, focusing on major advantages and/or weaknesses in the light of different research aims.Entities:
Keywords: SCID; SCID-hu; SCID-synth-hu; mouse models; multiple myeloma
Year: 2018 PMID: 29732008 PMCID: PMC5929451 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 15TMM and TG mouse models of MM
The pictures illustrate different strategies adopted to recapitulate MM disease. Models are divided according to their main characteristics: the green quadrant includes models of spontaneous mouse model of MM; the blue quadrant includes models of transgenic murine MM; each quadrant is accompanied by a table briefly describing the most relevant advantages and limits of each model. BD: bone disease; MM: multiple myeloma; BMM: bone marrow microenvironment
Figure 2Xenograft and SCID models of MM
The pictures illustrate different strategies to recapitulate human MM disease in mice. The yellow quadrant includes models where human MM cells are grown in murine bone marrow microenvironment; the red quadrant includes models where human MM cells are grown in human autologous or allogenic bone marrow microenvironment; each quadrant is accompanied by a table briefly describing the most relevant advantages and limits of each model. BD: bone disease; MM: multiple myeloma; BMM: bone marrow microenvironment
Figure 3Bone-disease model
The picture shows the radiologic evidence of a bone lytic lesion within a fetal bone chip. In the cartoon on the left, the main actors determining the bone resorption activity are reported. Th17: T helper 17 lymphocytes; MDSC: myeloid-derived suppressor cell; SC: stromal cell; OBL: osteoblast; MM: multiple myeloma cell; OCL: osteoclast.
Transgenic murine models of MM
| TG Model | TG | Genomic aberrations | Growth Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ld-IL-6 | T(12,15); c-MYC rearrang | E.M. monoclonal plasmacytomas/B cell lymphomas | |
| Eμ-v-abl | T(12,15); c-MYC rearrang | E.M. monoclonal plasmacytomas | |
| V-k exon-c-MYC | SHM dependent c-MYC expression in CD138+ PCs | I.M. MGUS/MM | |
| Eμ-xbp1 | Cyclin D1; MAF upreg. | I.M. MGUS/MM | |
| Eμ-IgH-c-MAF | X-BP1, Blimp-1 upreg.; PAX-5 dowreg. | Plasmablastic/plasmacytic lymphomas | |
| Eμ-IgH-Bcl-B | IGF-1, IL-6, c-MYC, X-BP1, IRF-4 upreg. | I.M. MM | |
| Rag2 -/- IL2R -/-/hIL-3-MCSF-GMCSF-TPO-IL-6 knock ins | Parental MM cell aberrations | Recipient of MGUS/sMM/MM PCs I.M. growth pattern |
Table 1 illustrates the main TG models discussed in the text together with the most relevant genomic aberrations detected in TG mice and the pattern of proliferation of malignant PCs (see text for further details). Abbreviations: rearrang.: genomic rearrangement; upreg.: upregulated gene; downreg: downregulated gene; SHM: somatic hypermutation machinery; I.M.: intramedullary; E.M.: extramedullary.