| Literature DB >> 29731906 |
Gang Hou1, Biying Chen1, Wenbin Xu1, Huiqing Zhao1, Kaihua Liu1, Hui Yao1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression of cell division cycle gene 2 (CDC2) in osteosarcoma tissues and its clinical significance. Specimens of cancer tissues, paracancerous tissues and serum from 47 patients hospitalized at the Department of Orthopedics at The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) from January, 2010 to January, 2015 and serum from 35 normal subjects were collected. The expression of CDC2 mRNA was evaluated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the relationship between CDC2 protein expression and clinical features of patients with osteosarcoma was analyzed. There was a significant difference in the expression levels of CDC2 between cancer (2.31±0.306) and paracancerous tissues (0.91±0.251) (P<0.05), and there was a difference in the expression of CDC2 in serum between patients (1.58±0.149) and the normal control group (0.67±0.136). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that CDC2 was of great value in the diagnosis of osteosarcoma. The expression of CDC2 was closely related to the tumor diameter (P<0.05), World Health Organization classification (P<0.05) and KPS score (P<0.05). However, there was no significant association between the expression of CDC2 and factors including age and sex (both P>0.05). The high expression of CDC2 was closely related to the lower survival rate in patients with osteosarcoma (P<0.05). The increase of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging of osteosarcoma and the high expression of CDC2 are the risk factors affecting the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients (P<0.05), and Cox regression analysis showed that the expression level of CDC2 was a risk factor affecting the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients (P<0.05). The results indicate that CDC2 is highly expressed in osteosarcoma and may be a biomarker to predict the occurrence, development and prognosis of osteosarcoma.Entities:
Keywords: Cox regression analysis; cell division cycle gene 2; osteosarcoma; receiver operating characteristic
Year: 2018 PMID: 29731906 PMCID: PMC5920721 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Instruments and reagents.
| Instruments and reagents | Manufacturer |
|---|---|
| PCR instrument | Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA) |
| Spectrophotometer SMA5000 | Merinton Instrument, Inc. (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) |
| Reverse transcription kit | Fermentas; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. |
| U6 internal reference | Guangzhou Shangeng Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) |
| 100 bp DNA Marker | Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) |
| 2X Taq PCR MasterMix | Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd. |
| TRIzol | Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd. |
| DEPC | Sigma Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) |
PCR, polymerase chain reaction; DEPC, diethyl pyrocarbonate.
Primer sequences.
| Primer | U6 internal reference | CDC2 |
|---|---|---|
| F | 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3 | 5′-TACCTATGGAGTTGTGTATAA-3′ |
| R | 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′ | 5’′-ATTCCACTTCTGGCCACACTT-3′ |
F, forward; R, reverse; CDC2, cell division cycle gene 2.
Figure 1.ROC curve of diagnosis of osteosarcoma via CDC2. AUC =0.785 with a high diagnostic value. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; CDC2, cell division cycle gene 2.
Expression levels of CDC2 in tissues and blood.
| A, Tissue | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cancer tissue | Paracancerous tissue | P-value |
| 2.31±0.306 | 0.91±0.251 | 0.013 |
| Patient | Normal subject | P-value |
| 1.58±0.149 | 0.67±0.136 | 0.024 |
CDC2, cell division cycle gene 2.
Clinical characteristics of 447 patients with osteosarcoma.
| Item | No. | CDC2 expression level | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Male | 31 | 2.38±0.317 | 0.685 |
| Female | 16 | 2.24±0.305 | |
| Age (years) | |||
| <12 | 25 | 2.31±0.313 | 0.314 |
| ≥12 | 22 | 1.91±0.206 | |
| Histological subtypes | |||
| Osteoblastic osteosarcoma | 23 | 2.11±0.331 | 0.412 |
| Osteogenic osteosarcoma | 13 | 1.98±0.285 | |
| Fibroblastic osteosarcoma | 11 | 2.06±0.446 | |
| KPS score | |||
| <70 | 30 | 3.01±0.363 | 0.032 |
| ≥70 | 17 | 1.81±0.106 | |
| Tumor location | |||
| Upper limb bone | 9 | 2.43±0.278 | 0.647 |
| Lower limb bone | 38 | 2.31±0.306 | |
| Tumor size (cm) | |||
| <10 | 36 | 2.84±0.267 | 0.042 |
| ≥10 | 11 | 1.94±0.348 | |
| WHO classification | |||
| I | 15 | 1.57±0.124 | |
| II | 24 | 2.79±0.217 | 0.039 |
| III | 8 | 1.97±0.135 | |
| TNM staging | |||
| I/II | 35 | 1.65±0.152 | 0.035 |
| III/IV | 12 | 2.87±0.225 | |
| Pathological fracture | |||
| Yes | 11 | 2.48±0.165 | 0.752 |
| No | 36 | 2.74±0.274 |
CDC2, cell division cycle gene 2, TNM, tumor lymph nodes metastasis; WHO, World Health Organization.
Univariate and multivariate analysis.
| Variables | Univariate HR (95%CI) | Multivariate P-value | HR (95%CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDC2 (low vs. high) | 1.647 (1.122–2.896) | 0.009 | 1.969 (0.9505–4.0765) | 0.012 |
| Age (<12 vs. ≥12 years) | 1.014 (0.999–1.029) | 0.062 | ||
| Sex (male vs. female) | 0.819 | |||
| (0.277–2.424) | 0.788 | |||
| Diameter of tumor (<10 vs. ≥10 cm) | 0.812 | |||
| (0.357–1.847) | 0.682 | |||
| Tumor site | 2.2611 | |||
| (Upper vs. lower limb bone) | ||||
| (0.9821–147.3) | 0.052 | |||
| TNM staging | 3.064 | |||
| (1.282–7.323) | 0.028 | 1.268 (0.918–2.471) | 0.041 |
CDC2, cell division cycle gene 2, TNM, tumor lymph nodes metastasis.