An-Yi Wang1, Hon-Ping Ma2, Wei-Fong Kao3, Shin-Han Tsai4, Cheng-Kuei Chang5. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Emergency Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, New-Taipei City, Taiwan. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan. 4. Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Emergency Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, New-Taipei City, Taiwan. 5. Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Neurosurgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, New-Taipei City, Taiwan. Electronic address: 11064@s.tmu.edu.tw.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Appropriate utilization of intensive care unit (ICU) beds are essential. Patients with critical illness who have do not resuscitate (DNR) have a reduced priority of intensive care. However, the possibility of recovery/survival is ambiguous and multifactorial. OBJECTIVE: To deliberate the characteristics and outcomes of critical illness in patients with prior DNR who were admitted to the emergency department (ED)-ICU. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted between April 2015 and November 2015 in a university-based hospital. Non-traumatic patients with DNR admitted to ED-ICU from ED were included. RESULTS: Seventy-eight non-trauma patients with prior DNR status were included in the final analysis. 51.3% (40/78) patients were male with median age 83 (IQR: 75-89) years. The median APACHE II score was 24.5 (IQR: 20-30). 50% (39/78) of the DNR patients survived to discharge. Patients who survived to discharge had lower APACHE II score (23 (IQR: 20-28) vs. 28 (18-38), p = 0.028). There was no significant difference in age, gender, and Charlson index. ROC curves were constructed, generating a cut-off of the APACHE II score at 29.5 for determining survival to discharge (AUC = 0.644, p = 0.028). In multivariate Cox proportional model, APACHE II score above 29.5 was an independent predictor for mortality. (Hazard ratio = 2.46; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-5.83, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Our study found that 50% of patients with prior DNR on ICU admission survived to discharge, indicating that aggressive care is not definitely futile. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and patients' and/or families' satisfaction of the ICU admission of DNR patients.
BACKGROUND: Appropriate utilization of intensive care unit (ICU) beds are essential. Patients with critical illness who have do not resuscitate (DNR) have a reduced priority of intensive care. However, the possibility of recovery/survival is ambiguous and multifactorial. OBJECTIVE: To deliberate the characteristics and outcomes of critical illness in patients with prior DNR who were admitted to the emergency department (ED)-ICU. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted between April 2015 and November 2015 in a university-based hospital. Non-traumaticpatients with DNR admitted to ED-ICU from ED were included. RESULTS: Seventy-eight non-traumapatients with prior DNR status were included in the final analysis. 51.3% (40/78) patients were male with median age 83 (IQR: 75-89) years. The median APACHE II score was 24.5 (IQR: 20-30). 50% (39/78) of the DNR patients survived to discharge. Patients who survived to discharge had lower APACHE II score (23 (IQR: 20-28) vs. 28 (18-38), p = 0.028). There was no significant difference in age, gender, and Charlson index. ROC curves were constructed, generating a cut-off of the APACHE II score at 29.5 for determining survival to discharge (AUC = 0.644, p = 0.028). In multivariate Cox proportional model, APACHE II score above 29.5 was an independent predictor for mortality. (Hazard ratio = 2.46; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-5.83, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Our study found that 50% of patients with prior DNR on ICU admission survived to discharge, indicating that aggressive care is not definitely futile. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and patients' and/or families' satisfaction of the ICU admission of DNR patients.