Literature DB >> 29731147

Five-Year Graft Survival of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) versus Descemet Stripping EK and the Effect of Donor Sex Matching.

David A Price1, Meagan Kelley1, Francis W Price2, Marianne O Price3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the reduced risk of immunologic rejection with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) results in a 5-year survival advantage relative to Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) and to determine whether matching the donor and recipient sex affects the rejection episode and graft survival rates.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy treated with DSEK or DMEK.
METHODS: This study reviewed 2017 consecutive cases (1312 DSEK and 705 DMEK) performed by 13 surgeons between 2003 and 2012 and included the surgeons' first cases. Survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Immunologic rejection episodes, graft failure or replacement for any reason, and endothelial cell loss.
RESULTS: The 5-year rejection episode rate was lower with DMEK (2.6% vs. 7.9% with DSEK, relative risk, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.53) despite early reduction of topical corticosteroids in 25% of the DMEK cases. African Americans (n = 46) had a higher risk of rejection episodes than other races (relative risk, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-9.6). The cumulative 5-year survival rate was 93% with DSEK and DMEK (P = 0.86). Forty-four DMEK and 69 DSEK grafts failed or were replaced within 5 years, but only 1 DMEK and 4 DSEK failures followed a rejection episode. Rejection episodes increased endothelial cell loss (P = 0.004) but were not a significant risk factor for graft failure within 5 years (P = 0.90). The mean 5-year endothelial cell loss was similar between DMEK (48%±19%) and DSEK (47%±19%) (P = 0.22). Graft rejection episode and survival rates were not significantly influenced by whether the sex of the donor matched that of the recipient (rejection episodes: P = 0.07 for female recipients and P = 0.33 for male recipients; graft survival: P = 0.67 for female recipients and P = 0.17 for male recipients).
CONCLUSIONS: Five-year graft survival was similar between DMEK and DSEK. Although DMEK had a significantly lower risk of immunologic rejection, rejection episodes rarely resulted in graft failure within 5 years with either procedure. Sex matching the donor and recipient provided no survival advantage with DSEK or DMEK.
Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29731147     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.03.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  22 in total

1.  "Endothelium-Out" and "Endothelium-In" Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Graft Insertion Techniques: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Hla M Htoon; Marcus Ang; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  Pseudophakic corneal donor tissue in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): implications for cornea banks and surgeons.

Authors:  Daniel Pilger; Necip Torun; Anna-Karina B Maier; Jan Schroeter
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-23

Review 3.  Indications, surgical procedures and outcomes of keratoplasty at a Tertiary University-based hospital: a review of 10 years' experience.

Authors:  Eman M Al-Sharif; Majed Alkharashi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Secondary DMEK following failed primary DMEK.

Authors:  Konstantinos Droutsas; Palaiologos Alexopoulos; Ioannis Giachos; Eleftherios Giallouros; Walter Sekundo; Apostolos Lazaridis
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Factors Associated With Graft Rejection in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  R Doyle Stulting; Jonathan H Lass; Mark A Terry; Beth Ann Benetz; Nathan J Cohen; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Christopher Croasdale; Yassine J Daoud; Steven P Dunn; Kenneth M Goins; Pankaj C Gupta; Marian S Macsai; Shahzad I Mian; Sudeep Pramanik; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Jonathan C Song; Walter J Stark; Alan Sugar; David D Verdier; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 6.  Advances in corneal graft rejection.

Authors:  Jia Yin
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.299

7.  An endothelial rejection line following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Muhannad Alkhalifah; Bader Alqahtani; Abdulmohsen Almulhim; Waleed Alsarhani
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) rejection following COVID-19 infection: A case report.

Authors:  Karen Bitton; Mathieu Dubois; Romain Courtin; Christophe Panthier; Damien Gatinel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2021-06-16

9.  Comparison of Donor Cornea Endothelial Cell Density Determined by Eye Banks and by a Central Reading Center in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Beth Ann Benetz; Christopher G Stoeger; Sanjay V Patel; Robert C OʼBrien; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Harry J Menegay; Peter Bedard; Jameson M Clover; Pankaj C Gupta; Kristen E McCoy; Jonathan C Song; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.152

10.  The Rapid Transformation of Transplantation for Corneal Endothelial Diseases: An Evolution From Penetrating to Lamellar to Cellular Transplants.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Dipika V Patel; Charles N J McGhee
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.