Literature DB >> 29730754

Differential sensitivity to the antifouling chemical medetomidine between wood frog and American toad tadpoles with evidence for low-dose stimulation and high-dose inhibition of metamorphosis.

Peter P Fong1, Olivia J Lambert2, Margot L Hoagland3, Emily R Kurtz2.   

Abstract

Antifouling chemicals are legacy contaminants in aquatic ecosystems. Previous experiments have shown that a 14-day exposure to the antifouling chemical medetomidine delays metamorphosis and reduces body mass in wood frog tadpoles. In the present study, we exposed wood frog tadpoles to medetomidine for 3, 7, and 10 days at 100 nM, 1 μM, and 10 μM. We also exposed American toad tadpoles to medetomidine for 3 days at four concentrations (10 nM, 100 nM, 1 μM, and 10 μM) in static renewal experiments. In each experiment, we measured growth, frequency and time to metamorphosis, and mass at metamorphosis. In both species, medetomidine significantly slowed development as measured by the Gosner stage. After 34 days in culture, wood frog tadpoles exposed to 1 and 10 μM medetomidine for as few as 3 days were significantly less developed compared to controls. Toads exposed to 1 μM medetomidine for 3 days were also significantly less developed on day 27, but by day 34, there was no difference from controls. For wood frogs, medetomidine significantly affected time to metamorphosis with a trend for tadpoles at lower concentrations metamorphosing sooner than those at higher concentrations. While medetomidine affected time to metamorphosis in wood frogs, it did not affect fresh mass, dry mass, or mortality compared to controls. Wood frog tadpoles that did not metamorphose after over 90 days in culture were more frequent in high-concentration groups than in the control. In toads, 10 μM medetomidine was 100% lethal within 23 days, but at the same concentration and duration, no wood frog tadpoles died. Lower concentrations were also significantly lethal to toads compared to controls, but tadpoles that survived in 10 and 100 nM metamorphosed sooner than those in 1 μM. Fresh mass of toad tadpoles exposed to 1 μm was significantly smaller at metamorphosis compared to that of controls. Medetomidine also affected the behavior of tadpoles. In toads, medetomidine significantly reduced both percent activity and startle response. In wood frogs, medetomidine significantly reduced percent activity, but increased startle response. We discuss our finding of low-dose stimulation and high-dose inhibition of different life history endpoints in terms of hormetic mechanisms. The differential sensitivity between species in terms of mortality, frequency of metamorphosis, and behavior highlights the potential negative environmental effects of medetomidine to amphibians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphibians; Antifouling; Aquatic; Ecotoxicology; Medetomidine; Metamorphosis; Tadpole

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29730754     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2168-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  33 in total

1.  Economic and environmental impacts on ports and harbors from the convention to ban harmful marine anti-fouling systems.

Authors:  Michael A Champ
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Short-term effects of medetomidine on photosynthesis and protein synthesis in periphyton, epipsammon and plankton communities in relation to predicted environmental concentrations.

Authors:  Cecilia Ohlauson; Karl Martin Eriksson; Hans Blanck
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.209

3.  An examination of amphibian sensitivity to environmental contaminants: are amphibians poor canaries?

Authors:  Jacob L Kerby; Kathryn L Richards-Hrdlicka; Andrew Storfer; David K Skelly
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Heavy metals alter the survival, growth, metamorphosis, and antipredatory behavior of Columbia spotted frog (Rana luteiventris) tadpoles.

Authors:  H Lefcort; R A Meguire; L H Wilson; W F Ettinger
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Differential uptake of gold nanoparticles by 2 species of tadpole, the wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) and the bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus).

Authors:  Lucas B Thompson; Gerardo L F Carfagno; Kurt Andresen; Andrea J Sitton; Taylor Bury; Laura L Lee; Kevin T Lerner; Peter P Fong
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Subchronic and chronic developmental effects of copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles on Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Shawna Nations; Monique Long; Mike Wages; Jonathan D Maul; Christopher W Theodorakis; George P Cobb
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Medetomidine as a candidate antifoulant: sublethal effects on juvenile turbot (Psetta maxima L.).

Authors:  Annelie Hilvarsson; Halldór Pálmar Halldórsson; Ake Granmo
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2007-05-06       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Toxicity of road salt to Nova Scotia amphibians.

Authors:  Sara J Collins; Ronald W Russell
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Atrazine-induced hermaphroditism at 0.1 ppb in American leopard frogs (Rana pipiens): laboratory and field evidence.

Authors:  Tyrone Hayes; Kelly Haston; Mable Tsui; Anhthu Hoang; Cathryn Haeffele; Aaron Vonk
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Mechanisms and consequences of developmental acceleration in tadpoles responding to pond drying.

Authors:  Ivan Gomez-Mestre; Saurabh Kulkarni; Daniel R Buchholz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.