Literature DB >> 29730663

Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Ovarian Cancer Patients: Evidence from 52 Studies.

Yifeng Tao1, Hui Li1, Rongyong Huang2, Dan Mo3, Tian Zeng3, Min Fang1, Meiqin Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Relevant markers of cancer stem cells (CSCs) may serve as commonly used biomarkers of ovarian cancer (OC). However, their actual clinicopathological and prognostic significance remains inconclusive. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate the association between the expression of CSC-relevant markers (ALDH1, CD117, CD133, and CD44) and OC.
METHODS: We used an odds ratio (OR) and a hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) to estimate the effects by analyzing 52 studies from a literature search. Heterogeneity and sensitivity were evaluated, as well. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger tests.
RESULTS: ALDH1 expression was statistically associated with FIGO stage (OR=1.872, 95%CI=1.14-3.076, P=0.013) and lymph invasion (OR=2.78, 95%CI=1.08-7.152, P=0.034). CD117 expression was significantly associated with FIGO stage (OR=2.01, 95%CI=1.35-2.98, P=0.001). CD133 expression was correlated with FIGO stage (OR=3.410, 95%CI=2.196-5.294, P< 0.001) and differentiation grade (OR=2.672, 95%CI=1.354-5.272, P=0.005). CD44s was related to chemotherapy resistance (OR=3.218, 95%CI=1.148-9.016, P=0.026). Furthermore, overexpression of ALDH1 (HR=1.494, 95%CI=1.207-1.849, P< 0.001), CD117 (HR=1.395, 95%CI=1.025-1.898, P=0.034) or CD44s (HR=1.725, 95%CI=1.135-2.623, P=0.011) was associated with poor OS. Further, overexpression of both ALDH1 (HR=1.524, 95%CI=1.158-2.007, P=0.003) and CD44s (HR=2.12, 95%CI=1.692-2.657, P< 0.001) was correlated with worse DFS.
CONCLUSION: CSC markers are useful predictive or prognostic biomarkers for OC in clinical assessments. Combined detection of CSC marker expression may be a powerful tool for prognostic predictions in clinical practice for patients with OC.
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aldh1; CD117; CD133; CD44; Meta-analysis; Ovarian cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29730663     DOI: 10.1159/000489586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Physiol Biochem        ISSN: 1015-8987


  7 in total

Review 1.  p53 and Cell Fate: Sensitizing Head and Neck Cancer Stem Cells to Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Christie Rodriguez-Ramirez; Jacques E Nör
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncog       Date:  2018

Review 2.  The Clinical Impact of Cancer Stem Cells.

Authors:  Justin Lathia; Huiping Liu; Daniela Matei
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-12-17

Review 3.  MicroRNAs, Hypoxia and the Stem-Like State as Contributors to Cancer Aggressiveness.

Authors:  Lucy Wanjiku Macharia; Caroline Muriithi Wanjiru; Marianne Wanjiru Mureithi; Claudia Maria Pereira; Valéria Pereira Ferrer; Vivaldo Moura-Neto
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 4.  Cancer Stem Cells-Key Players in Tumor Relapse.

Authors:  Monica Marzagalli; Fabrizio Fontana; Michela Raimondi; Patrizia Limonta
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  How to win the ovarian cancer stem cell battle: destroying the roots.

Authors:  Akimasa Takahashi; Linda Hong; Ilana Chefetz
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2020-12-22

6.  CD133 Act as an Essential Marker in Ovarian Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Dzul Ikram; Rina Masadah; Berti J Nelwan; Andi Alfian Zainuddin; Mahmud Ghaznawie; Syarifuddin Wahid
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-11-01

Review 7.  Peritoneal dissemination of high-grade serous ovarian cancer: pivotal roles of chromosomal instability and epigenetic dynamics.

Authors:  Ikuo Konishi; Kaoru Abiko; Takuma Hayashi; Koji Yamanoi; Ryusuke Murakami; Ken Yamaguchi; Junzo Hamanishi; Tsukasa Baba; Noriomi Matsumura; Masaki Mandai
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 4.756

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.