Literature DB >> 29730532

Development and comparison of HPLC-MS/MS and UPLC-MS/MS methods for determining eight coccidiostats in beef.

Xia Zhao1, Bo Wang1, Kaizhou Xie2, Jianyu Liu1, Yangyang Zhang1, Yajuan Wang1, Yawen Guo1, Genxi Zhang1, Guojun Dai1, Jinyu Wang1.   

Abstract

A high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method and an ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method for determining eight coccidiostat (halofuginone, lasalocid, maduramicin, monensin, narasin, nigericin, robenidine and salinomycin) residues in beef were developed and compared. Samples were extracted with a mixture of acetic acid, acetonitrile and ethyl acetate and were then purified on a C18 solid-phase extraction (SPE) column. The purified samples were analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS and UPLC-MS/MS, using 0.1% formic acid-water solution (A) and pure methanol (B) as the mobile phase. The samples were fractionated on a C18 column using different gradient elution procedures, followed by qualitative analysis using a mass spectrometer operated in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with positive electrospray ionization; the external standard method was used for quantitation. At spiked levels that ranged from the limit of quantification (LOQ) to 100 μg/kg, the average recoveries were 71.96%-100.32% and 71.24%-89.24%, with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 2.65%-12.38% and 2.98%-14.86% for UPLC-MS/MS and HPLC-MS/MS, respectively. The limits of detection (LODs) and LOQs of the eight coccidiostats were 0.14-0.32 μg/kg and 0.43-1.21 μg/kg, respectively, for UPLC-MS/MS analysis and 0.16-0.58 μg/kg and 0.53-1.92 μg/kg, respectively, for HPLC-MS/MS analysis. Both methods had good accuracy and precision, but UPLC-MS/MS had higher sensitivity than HPLC-MS/MS.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beef; Coccidiostats; HPLC-MS/MS; UPLC-MS/MS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29730532     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.04.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  6 in total

Review 1.  Reducing Veterinary Drug Residues in Animal Products: A Review.

Authors:  Md Shohel Rana; Seung Yun Lee; Hae Jin Kang; Sun Jin Hur
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2019-10-31

2.  Solvent Front Position Extraction and some conventional sample preparation techniques for the determination of coccidiostats in poultry feed by LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Maciej Jan Rybicki; Ilse Becue; Els Daeseleire; Anna Klimek-Turek; Tadeusz Henryk Dzido
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Simultaneous measurement of multiple organic tracers in fine aerosols from biomass burning and fungal spores by HPLC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Jingsha Xu; Jun He; Honghui Xu; Dongsheng Ji; Colin Snape; Huan Yu; Chunrong Jia; Chengjun Wang; Jianfa Gao
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 4.  Chromatographic-Based Platforms as New Avenues for Scientific Progress and Sustainability.

Authors:  José S Câmara; Cátia Martins; Jorge A M Pereira; Rosa Perestrelo; Sílvia M Rocha
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  Determination of Eight Coccidiostats in Eggs by Liquid-Liquid Extraction-Solid-Phase Extraction and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Jianyu Liu; Xia Zhao; Kaizhou Xie; Zhixiang Diao; Genxi Zhang; Tao Zhang; Guojun Dai
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Metabolomics Tools Assisting Classic Screening Methods in Discovering New Antibiotics from Mangrove Actinomycetia in Leizhou Peninsula.

Authors:  Qin-Pei Lu; Yong-Mei Huang; Shao-Wei Liu; Gang Wu; Qin Yang; Li-Fang Liu; Hai-Tao Zhang; Yi Qi; Ting Wang; Zhong-Ke Jiang; Jun-Jie Li; Hao Cai; Xiu-Jun Liu; Hui Luo; Cheng-Hang Sun
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.118

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.