Literature DB >> 29730138

Establishing maximal medical improvement after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Richard N Puzzitiello1, Avinesh Agarwalla1, Joseph N Liu1, Gregory L Cvetanovich1, Anthony A Romeo1, Brian Forsythe2, Nikhil N Verma1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As a heightened emphasis continues to be placed on value-based health care, quality outcomes following orthopedic procedures must be properly defined. With knowledge of the time to maximal medical improvement following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), physician resources can be justly allocated to optimize value in ambulatory orthopedic care.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies reporting sequential follow-up at several time points, up to a minimum of 2 years after TSA. Assessment for clinically significant improvements between time intervals was made by using the minimal clinically important difference specific to each patient-reported outcome measure.
RESULTS: We identified 13 studies that fit the criteria to be included in this review, amounting to 984 patients who underwent TSA. Clinically significant improvements in patient-reported outcome scores were appreciated up to 1 year following TSA, but no further clinical significance was seen from 1 year to 2 years. Objective physical examination measurements followed a similar trend, with clinically significant improvements in abduction occurring up to 1 year postoperatively. For both the subjective and objective outcomes, the majority of improvements occurred in the first 3 months after the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Following TSA, clinically significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes and objective clinical measurements are seen up to 1 year postoperatively but not beyond this time. This result is important for counseling patients and modifying their expectations prior to surgery as well as for establishing a time frame for maximized outcome evaluation to define the value received from TSA.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MCID; Total shoulder arthroplasty; clinical significance; maximal medical improvement; minimal clinically important difference; patient-reported outcomes; value

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29730138     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  4 in total

1.  One and two-year clinical outcomes for a polyethylene glenoid with a fluted peg: one thousand two hundred seventy individual patients from eleven centers.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Joseph P Iannotti; R Sean Churchill; Lieven De Wilde; T Bradley Edwards; Matthew C Evans; Edward V Fehringer; Gordon I Groh; James D Kelly; Christopher M Kilian; Giovanni Merolla; Tom R Norris; Giuseppe Porcellini; Edwin E Spencer; Anne Vidil; Michael A Wirth; Stacy M Russ; Moni Neradilek; Jeremy S Somerson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Maximal Medical Improvement Following Shoulder Stabilization Surgery May Require up to 1 Year: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bhavik H Patel; Yining Lu; Avinesh Agarwalla; Richard N Puzzitiello; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Jorge Chahla; Brian Forsythe
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-09-10

3.  Resurfacing hemiarthroplasty versus stemmed hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Baoliang Zhang; Guanghui Chen; Tianqi Fan; Zhongqiang Chen
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-09-01

4.  Return to work following shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Simon P Lalehzarian; Avinesh Agarwalla; Joseph N Liu
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.