Literature DB >> 29730137

Differentiation of bony and soft-tissue adaptations of the shoulder in professional baseball pitchers.

Katherine E Reuther1, Scott Sheridan2, Stephen J Thomas3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Baseball pitching places tremendous forces on the arm, which may lead to structural tissue adaptations that are represented by changes in rotational range of motion (ROM). These adaptations often include both bony and soft tissue; however, the contribution of each tissue to the change in motion is not always clinically attainable. The purposes of this study were to determine the adaptations of ROM, bone, and soft tissue bilaterally and to examine the correlation between clinical ROM and humeral retroversion (HR)-corrected ROM. We hypothesized that glenohumeral internal rotation (IR) and total motion would be decreased and glenohumeral external rotation (ER), posterior capsule thickness (PCT), and HR would be increased in the dominant arm; that HR-corrected ROM would be significantly different than clinical ROM; and that HR-corrected ROM would be correlated with total motion difference.
METHODS: Thirty professional baseball pitchers participated in this study. HR, PCT, and glenohumeral IR and ER were evaluated in the dominant and nondominant shoulders of each subject.
RESULTS: The dominant arm exhibited significantly more retroversion, ER, and PCT than the nondominant arm. The dominant arm also had significantly less IR and total motion than the nondominant arm. The total ROM difference was significantly correlated with both HR-corrected glenohumeral IR deficit and ER gain.
CONCLUSION: HR-corrected glenohumeral IR deficit and ER gain may more accurately reflect the contribution of soft-tissue changes to ROM. Unfortunately, measurement of HR is not always clinically attainable, making clinical management difficult.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERG; GIRD; Humeral retroversion; glenohumeral; range of motion; shoulder; throwing athlete

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29730137     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

1.  The throwing shoulder in youth elite handball: soft-tissue adaptations but not humeral retrotorsion differ between the two sexes.

Authors:  Leonard Achenbach; Annabelle Catherine Clément; Lukas Hufsky; Stefan Greiner; Florian Zeman; Sven Stephan Walter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Reliability and Validity of a 1-Person Technique to Measure Humeral Torsion Using Ultrasound.

Authors:  Daniel C Hannah; Jason S Scibek; Christopher R Carcia; Amy L Phelps
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Humeral Retroversion and Participation Age in Professional Baseball Pitchers by Geographic Region.

Authors:  Stephen J Thomas; Scott Sheridan; Katherine E Reuther
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The Relationship Between Humeral Torsion and Arm Injury in Baseball Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua K Helmkamp; Garrett S Bullock; Allison Rao; Ellen Shanley; Charles Thigpen; Grant E Garrigues
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  Junior and Collegiate Tennis Players Display Similar Bilateral Asymmetries of Humeral Retroversion.

Authors:  Daniel C Hannah; Jason S Scibek; Christopher R Carcia; Amy L Phelps
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Descriptive Strength and Range of Motion in Youth Baseball Players.

Authors:  Ross M Nakaji; Todd S Ellenbecker; Kevin M McClenahan; Lianna M Roberts; Chase Perez; Scott B Dickenson
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-02-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.