Literature DB >> 29729819

One year after proximal or distal periprosthetic fracture of the femur -two conditions with divergent outcomes?

D Eschbach1, B Buecking2, H Kivioja2, M Fischer2, T Wiesmann3, R Zettl4, L Oberkircher2, J Barthel2, R Aigner2, S Ruchholtz2, C Bliemel2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Arthroplasty of the hip and knee is 1 of the 20 most frequent operations in Germany. Periprosthetic fracture is one of the most feared complications following primary or revision arthroplasty. Present publication aims to analyse differences between patients with periprosthetic fracture around total knee arthroplasty (PFTKA) and patients with periprosthetic fracture around total hip arthroplasty (PFTHA) concerning demographics, clinical course, complications and return to pre-fracture mobility.
METHODS: Prospective single-centre observation study of periprosthetic femoral fractures with stable implants. Present subgroup analysis includes patients with PFTKA and PFTHA. All patients were treated with polyaxial angular stable plates using two standardized techniques: a minimally invasive percutaneous distal insertion technique and a mini-open technique. Data collection included implant- and operation-related information as well as demographics, clinical course, complications and return to pre-fracture mobility. Data were collected during a 12-month follow-up.
RESULTS: We were able to analyse the data of 73 patients. The PFTKA group had 37 patients with a mean age of 76 ± 10 years; 88% were female. After 1 year, 3 patients in this cohort had died; 68% of survivors had reached their pre-fracture mobility; 22% had undergone operative revisions for various reasons. The PFTHA cohort included 36 patients with a mean age of 80 ± 13 years, 72% were female. After 1 year, 9 patients had died in this cohort, 42% of survivors had reached their pre-fracture mobility. Non-operative complications occurred for 16% in the PFTKA group and 64% in the PFTHA group (p < 0.001). 11% had undergone operative revisions for various reasons, among them, two cases of nonunion but no primary infection.
CONCLUSION: On average, compared to the PFTHA patients, PFTKA patients were younger, underwent significantly lower rates of non-operative complications, had a tendency towards lower mortality, and returned to pre-fracture mobility at higher rates, although they tended to have more revisions when compared to treatment for PFTHA. Overall, when periprosthetic fractures of the femur were treated using polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis, patients showed very low rates of nonunion and no primary infection.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geriatric fracture; Hip associated periprosthetic fracture; Knee associated periprosthetic fracture; Periprosthetic fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29729819     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  6 in total

Review 1.  Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing and Locked Plating for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femur Fractures: A Meta-Analysis and Quantitative Review.

Authors:  Vishaal Sakthivelnathan; Prabhudev Prasad Purudappa; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Sujit Kumar Tripathy; Akshay Goel; Senthil Nathan Sambandam
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-05

Review 2.  Does early surgery improve outcomes for periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Farrow; A D Ablett; H W Sargeant; T O Smith; A T Johnston
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Beyond Hip Fractures: Other Fragility Fractures' Associated Mortality, Functional and Economic Importance: A 2-year-Follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas Wiedl; Stefan Förch; Alexander Otto; Leonard Lisitano; Kim Rau; Thilo Nachbaur; Edgar Mayr
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-30

4.  [Locking plate fixation of distal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Clinical outcome and mortality].

Authors:  C Gassner; F Sommer; B Rubenbauer; A M Keppler; Y Liesaus; W C Prall; C Kammerlander; W Böcker; J Fürmetz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Early Surgery Does Not Improve Outcomes for Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures-Results from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society.

Authors:  Christopher Bliemel; Katherine Rascher; Tom Knauf; Juliana Hack; Daphne Asimenia Eschbach; Rene Aigner; Ludwig Oberkircher
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Demographics, Treatment, and Cost of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: Fixation Versus Revision.

Authors:  Katelyn Ragland; Rebecca Reif; Saleema Karim; Kevin W Sexton; Steven M Cherney; Jeffrey B Stambough; Simon C Mears
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.