Literature DB >> 29729600

Using raw and sulfur-impregnated activated carbon as active cap for leaching inhibition of mercury and methylmercury from contaminated sediment.

Yu Ting1, Chi Chen1, Boon-Lek Ch'ng1, Ying-Lin Wang1, Hsing-Cheng Hsi2.   

Abstract

Sulfur-impregnated activated carbon (SAC) has been reported with a high affinity to Hg, but little research has done on understanding its potential as active cap for inhibition of Hg release from contaminated sediments. In this study, high-quality coconut-shell activated carbon (AC) and its derived SAC were examined and shown to have great affinity to both aqueous Hg2+ and methylmercury (MeHg). SAC had greater partitioning coefficients for Hg2+ (KD = 9.42 × 104) and MeHg (KD = 7.661 × 105) as compared to those for AC (KD = 3.69 × 104 and 2.25 × 105, respectively). However, AC appeared to have greater inhibition in total Hg (THg) leaching from sediment (14.2-235.8 mg-Hg/kg-sediment) to porewater phase as compared to SAC. 3 wt% AC amendment in sediment (235.8 mg/kg Hg) was the optimum dosage causing the porewater THg reduction by 99.88%. Moreover, significant inhibition in both THg and MeHg releases within the 83-d trial microcosm tests was demonstrated with active caps composed of SAC + bentonite, SAC + clean sediment, and AC + bentonite. While both AC and SAC successfully reduce the porewater Hg in sediment environment, the smaller inhibition in Hg release by SAC as compared to that by raw AC may suggest that possibly formed HgS nanoparticles could be released into the porewater that elevates the porewater Hg concentration.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active capping; Mercury; Methylmercury; Sediment; Sulfur-impregnated activated carbon

Year:  2018        PMID: 29729600     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  3 in total

1.  Uptake Mechanisms of a Novel, Activated Carbon-Based Equilibrium Passive Sampler for Estimating Porewater Methylmercury.

Authors:  Spencer J Washburn; Jada Damond; James P Sanders; Cynthia C Gilmour; Upal Ghosh
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.218

2.  Mercury biogeochemical cycling: A synthesis of recent scientific advances.

Authors:  Mae Sexauer Gustin; Michael S Bank; Kevin Bishop; Katlin Bowman; Brian Branfireun; John Chételat; Chris S Eckley; Chad R Hammerschmidt; Carl Lamborg; Seth Lyman; Antonio Martínez-Cortizas; Jonas Sommar; Martin Tsz-Ki Tsui; Tong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Mercury Removal from Water Using a Novel Composite of Polyacrylate-Modified Carbon.

Authors:  Mohammed Al-Yaari; Tawfik A Saleh
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-04-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.