Literature DB >> 29728952

Myocardial perfusion reserve and global longitudinal strain as potential markers of coronary allograft vasculopathy in late-stage orthotopic heart transplantation.

Akhil Narang1, John E Blair1, Mita B Patel2, Victor Mor-Avi1, Savitri E Fedson3, Nir Uriel1, Roberto M Lang1,4, Amit R Patel5,6.   

Abstract

Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major cause of mortality in late-stage orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) patients. Recent evidence has shown that myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) derived from vasodilator cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (vCMR) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) are useful to detect CAV. However, previous studies have not comprehensively addressed whether these parameters are confounded by allograft rejection, myocardial scar/fibrosis, or allograft dysfunction. Our aim was to determine whether changes in late post-OHT MPR and GLS are due to CAV or other confounding factors. Twenty OHT patients (time from transplant to vCMR was 8.1 ± 4.1 years) and 30 controls (10 healthy volunteers and 20 with prior myocardial infarction to provide perspective with regards to the severity of any abnormalities seen in post-OHT patients) underwent vasodilator vCMR from which MPR index (MPRi), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and burden of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were quantified. TTE was used to measure GLS. The presence of CAV was determined from invasive coronary angiograms using thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame counts and grading severity per guidelines. Previous endomyocardial biopsies were reviewed to assess association with episodes of rejection. We examined the correlations between MPRi and GLS with markers of CAV, allograft function, scar/fibrosis, and rejection. MPRi was abnormal in post-OHT patients compared to both healthy volunteers and MI controls. While there was no relationship between MPRi or GLS and LVEF, episodes of rejection, or LGE burden, both MPRi and GLS were associated with TIMI frame counts and presence and severity of CAV. Additionally, MPRi correlated with GLS (R = 0.68, P = 0.0002). In conclusion, MPRi and GLS are abnormal in late-stage OHT and associated with CAV, but not related to allograft rejection, myocardial scar/fibrosis, or allograft dysfunction. Non-invasive monitoring of MPRi and GLS may be a useful strategy to detect CAV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allograft vasculopathy; Echocardiography; Heart transplantation; Longitudinal strain; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardial perfusion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29728952      PMCID: PMC6160357          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1364-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  52 in total

1.  Early postoperative left ventricular function by echocardiographic strain is a predictor of 1-year mortality in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Sebastian Imre Sarvari; Ola Gjesdal; Einar Gude; Satish Arora; Arne Kristian Andreassen; Lars Gullestad; Odd Geiran; Thor Edvardsen
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Left ventricular global longitudinal strain predicts major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in heart transplant patients.

Authors:  Tor Skibsted Clemmensen; Hans Eiskjær; Brian Bridal Løgstrup; Lars Bo Ilkjær; Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Large high-density lipoprotein particle number is independently associated with microvascular function in patients with well-controlled low-density lipoprotein concentration: A vasodilator stress magnetic resonance perfusion study.

Authors:  Akhil Narang; Victor Mor-Avi; Nicole M Bhave; Giacomo Tarroni; Cristiana Corsi; Michael H Davidson; Roberto M Lang; Amit R Patel
Journal:  J Clin Lipidol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.766

4.  Left ventricular longitudinal strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography is associated with treatment-requiring cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  Fusako Sera; Tomoko S Kato; Maryjane Farr; Cesare Russo; Zhezhen Jin; Charles C Marboe; Marco R Di Tullio; Donna Mancini; Shunichi Homma
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 5.  A Test in Context: Myocardial Strain Measured by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography.

Authors:  Patrick Collier; Dermot Phelan; Allan Klein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Myocardial perfusion reserve in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Correlation to coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Authors:  Jochen Wöhrle; Thorsten Nusser; Nico Merkle; Hans A Kestler; Olaf C Grebe; Nikolaus Marx; Martin Höher; Matthias Kochs; Vinzenz Hombach
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with microvascular angina: analysis by TIMI frame count.

Authors:  Hongtao Sun; Yoshihiro Fukumoto; Akira Ito; Hiroaki Shimokawa; Kenji Sunagawa
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.105

8.  Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion at rest and during exercise with positron emission tomography after human cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  J Krivokapich; L W Stevenson; J Kobashigawa; S C Huang; H R Schelbert
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Coronary vasodilator reserve after human orthotopic cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  A L McGinn; R F Wilson; M T Olivari; D C Homans; C W White
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Molecular imaging of plaques in coronary arteries with PET and SPECT.

Authors:  Zhong-Hua Sun; Hairil Rashmizal; Lei Xu
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.327

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of baseline calibration on semiquantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion reserve by adenosine stress MRI.

Authors:  Andreas Seitz; Giancarlo Pirozzolo; Udo Sechtem; Raffi Bekeredjian; Peter Ong; Heiko Mahrholdt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Multi-modal imaging of the pediatric heart transplant recipient.

Authors:  Jonathan H Soslow; Margaret M Samyn
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-10

Review 3.  The role of non-invasive imaging modalities in cardiac allograft vasculopathy: an updated focus on current evidences.

Authors:  C Sciaccaluga; N Ghionzoli; G E Mandoli; N Sisti; F D'Ascenzi; M Focardi; S Bernazzali; G Vergaro; M Emdin; S Valente; M Cameli
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance with regadenoson stress perfusion is safe following pediatric heart transplantation and identifies history of rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Nazia Husain; Kae Watanabe; Haben Berhane; Aditi Gupta; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby; Joshua D Robinson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.364

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.