| Literature DB >> 29728894 |
Lawrence Owusu1,2,3, Caiming Xu1,4, Hailong Chen5,6, Geliang Liu7, Guixin Zhang1, Jinwen Zhang1, Zhankai Tang1, Zhongwei Sun1, Xin Yi8.
Abstract
Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) associated acute lung injury (ALI) accounts for about 70% mortality of SAP patients. However, there are no precise biomarkers for the disease currently. Herein, we evaluated the potential of gamma-enolase (ENO2), against its universal isoform alpha-enolase (ENO1), as a marker of SAP-ALI in a rat model. Firstly, 16 male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups, Sham (n = 8) and SAP-ALI (n = 8), for pancreatitis induction. Ultra-structure examination by electron microscopy and HE staining were used for lung injury assessment. Lung tissue expressions of alpha-enolase and gamma-enolase were evaluated by qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. In a prospective validation experiment, 28 rats were used: sham (n = 8), SAP-ALI at 3 h (3 h, n = 10), and SAP-ALI at 24 h (24 h, n = 10). Lung tissue damage, tissue expression and circulating alpha-enolase and gamma-enolase levels were evaluated. Elevated serum levels of α-amylase and TNF-α were observed in SAP rats but not in sham-operated rats. Histological examination of pancreatic and lung tissues indicated marked damage in SAP rats. While alpha-enolase was universally expressed, gamma-enolase was expressed only in damaged lung tissues. Gamma-enolase was detected in lung tissues, BALF, and serum as early as 3 h post-surgery when physical pathological damage was not apparent. Unlike alpha-enolase, secreted and/or circulating gamma-enolase level progressively increased, especially in serum, as lung damage progressed. Thus, gamma-enolase may signal and correlate lung tissue damage well before obvious physical pathological tissue damage and might be a candidate diagnostic and/or prognostic marker.Entities:
Keywords: Alpha-enolase; Gamma-enolase; Severe acute pancreatitis-induced acute lung injury; Sprague–Dawley rats
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29728894 DOI: 10.1007/s10735-018-9774-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Histol ISSN: 1567-2379 Impact factor: 2.611