Literature DB >> 29728238

A fully automated cell segmentation and morphometric parameter system for quantifying corneal endothelial cell morphology.

Shumoos Al-Fahdawi1, Rami Qahwaji2, Alaa S Al-Waisy2, Stanley Ipson2, Maryam Ferdousi3, Rayaz A Malik4, Arun Brahma5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Corneal endothelial cell abnormalities may be associated with a number of corneal and systemic diseases. Damage to the endothelial cells can significantly affect corneal transparency by altering hydration of the corneal stroma, which can lead to irreversible endothelial cell pathology requiring corneal transplantation. To date, quantitative analysis of endothelial cell abnormalities has been manually performed by ophthalmologists using time consuming and highly subjective semi-automatic tools, which require an operator interaction. We developed and applied a fully-automated and real-time system, termed the Corneal Endothelium Analysis System (CEAS) for the segmentation and computation of endothelial cells in images of the human cornea obtained by in vivo corneal confocal microscopy.
METHODS: First, a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) Band-pass filter is applied to reduce noise and enhance the image quality to make the cells more visible. Secondly, endothelial cell boundaries are detected using watershed transformations and Voronoi tessellations to accurately quantify the morphological parameters of the human corneal endothelial cells. The performance of the automated segmentation system was tested against manually traced ground-truth images based on a database consisting of 40 corneal confocal endothelial cell images in terms of segmentation accuracy and obtained clinical features. In addition, the robustness and efficiency of the proposed CEAS system were compared with manually obtained cell densities using a separate database of 40 images from controls (n = 11), obese subjects (n = 16) and patients with diabetes (n = 13).
RESULTS: The Pearson correlation coefficient between automated and manual endothelial cell densities is 0.9 (p < 0.0001) and a Bland-Altman plot shows that 95% of the data are between the 2SD agreement lines.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the CEAS system, and the possibility of utilizing it in a real world clinical setting to enable rapid diagnosis and for patient follow-up, with an execution time of only 6 seconds per image.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic cell segmentation; Corneal Confocal Microscopy; Corneal endothelial cells; Fast Fourier Transform; Voronoi Tessellation; Watershed transformation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29728238     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  11 in total

1.  Discrimination and quantification of live/dead rat brain cells using a non-linear segmentation model.

Authors:  Mukta Sharma; Mahua Bhattacharya
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Fully convolutional architecture vs sliding-window CNN for corneal endothelium cell segmentation.

Authors:  Juan P Vigueras-Guillén; Busra Sari; Stanley F Goes; Hans G Lemij; Jeroen van Rooij; Koenraad A Vermeer; Lucas J van Vliet
Journal:  BMC Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-30

3.  Deep Learning for Assessing the Corneal Endothelium from Specular Microscopy Images up to 1 Year after Ultrathin-DSAEK Surgery.

Authors:  Juan P Vigueras-Guillén; Jeroen van Rooij; Angela Engel; Hans G Lemij; Lucas J van Vliet; Koenraad A Vermeer
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Corneal Confocal Microscopy detects a Reduction in Corneal Endothelial Cells and Nerve Fibres in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Adnan Khan; Saadat Kamran; Naveed Akhtar; Georgios Ponirakis; Hamad Al-Muhannadi; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Shumoos Al-Fahdawi; Rami Qahwaji; Faheem Sartaj; Blessy Babu; Muhammad Faisal Wadiwala; Ashfaq Shuaib; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Corneal confocal microscopy detects corneal nerve damage and increased dendritic cells in Fabry disease.

Authors:  Gulfidan Bitirgen; Kultigin Turkmen; Rayaz A Malik; Ahmet Ozkagnici; Nazmi Zengin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Corneal nerve and endothelial cell damage in patients with transient ischemic attack and minor ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Hoda Gad; Adnan Khan; Naveed Akhtar; Saadat Kamran; Ahmed El-Sotouhy; Soha R Dargham; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Georgios Ponirakis; Ashfaq Shuaib; Leopold J Streletz; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Automated segmentation of the corneal endothelium in a large set of 'real-world' specular microscopy images using the U-Net architecture.

Authors:  Moritz C Daniel; Lisa Atzrodt; Felicitas Bucher; Katrin Wacker; Stefan Böhringer; Thomas Reinhard; Daniel Böhringer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A modern deep learning framework in robot vision for automated bean leaves diseases detection.

Authors:  Sudad H Abed; Alaa S Al-Waisy; Hussam J Mohammed; Shumoos Al-Fahdawi
Journal:  Int J Intell Robot Appl       Date:  2021-04-30

9.  Corneal nerve loss as a surrogate marker for poor pial collaterals in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Adnan Khan; Ajay Menon; Naveed Akhtar; Saadat Kamran; Ahmad Muhammad; Georgios Ponirakis; Hoda Gad; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Faisal Wadiwala; Blessy Babu; Adeeb M Narangoli; Pablo G Bermejo; Hanadi Al Hamad; Marwan Ramadan; Peter Woodruff; Mark Santos; Maher Saqqur; Ashfaq Shuaib; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Unbiased corneal tissue analysis using Gabor-domain optical coherence microscopy and machine learning for automatic segmentation of corneal endothelial cells.

Authors:  Cristina Canavesi; Andrea Cogliati; Holly B Hindman
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.170

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.