| Literature DB >> 29728138 |
Walter Francesconi1,2, Fulvia Berton3,4, Maria Cecilia G Marcondes5,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In HIV+ individuals, the virus enters the central nervous system and invades innate immune cells, producing important changes that result in neurological deficits. We aimed to determine whether HIV plays a direct role in neuronal excitability. Of the HIV peptides, Tat is secreted and acts in other cells. In order to examine whether the HIV Tat can modify neuronal excitability, we exposed primary murine hippocampal neurons to that peptide, and tested its effects on the intrinsic membrane properties, 4 and 24 h after exposure.Entities:
Keywords: Electrophysiology; HIV Tat; Hippocampal neurons; Synaptic transmission; neuroHIV
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29728138 PMCID: PMC5935945 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3376-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Fig. 1Summary of baseline electrophysiological function behaviors that distinguish neuronal subsets in hippocampal primary cultures, and that were utilized to examine the effect of Tat exposure. The expected recording profiles distinguish pyramidal glutamatergic neurons (red lines) from GABAergic interneurons (blue lines), as seen in this representative electrophysiological characterization of hippocampal neurons in culture. a Whole cell patch-clamp recording from pyramidal neuron (upper red traces) and interneuron (lower blue traces). Voltage responses to hyperpolarizing and depolarizing current pulses differ in the 2 types of neurons. Pyramidal neurons show their characteristic voltage sag during hyperpolarizing pulse, and a strong adaptation. In contrast, interneurons fire at higher frequency without signs of adaptation. b Action potentials (AP) evoked by a short depolarizing current pulse. In the pyramidal neurons, AP shows a depolarizing potential during the repolarization phase (upper trace). In interneurons, the AP is followed by a fast hyperpolarization, referred to as fast after-hyperpolarization (fAHP) (lower trace), which is a characteristic oh hippocampal interneurons. c The action potential width is shorter in interneurons (blue lines) when compared to pyramidal neurons (res lines). We tested the hypothesis that HIV Tat has the ability to interact with neurons affecting their performance, which can be detectable by changes (increase or decrease) in the pulse current intensity that is necessary to elicit an AP
Fig. 2Input/output function slope (gain) is enhanced in Tat-treated pyramidal neurons. a The graph shows the mean number of action potentials (AP) generated by the pyramidal neurons is response to depolarizing current pulses of different intensities, in one representative experiment. In a defined range of current intensities, the relationship between number of spikes and current intensity is linear. The slope of this function, referred to as “Gain”, is higher in the pyramidal neurons treated wit Tat for 24 h (red), when compared to the control (blue) or to Tat for 4 h (green) in pyramidal neurons in culture, as determined by Pearson’s correlation coefficient. b The bar graph shows the mean (± SEM) slope of the input/output (I/O) function of controls (n = 10, blue bar) and Tat treated neurons for 4 h (n = 5, green bar) or for 24 h (n = 5, red bar). The mean slope of the I/O function was 1.95 ± 0.53 (SEM) for untreated pyramidal neurons and 5.89 ± 0.59 (SEM) for Tat treated neurons (p < 0.002, ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test)
Effect of HIV-1 Tat peptide on resting membrane potential (RMP), input resistance (Rin), action potential threshold, and rheobase in hippocampal pyramidal neurons
| RMP (mV) | Rin (MW) | Threshold (mV) | Rheobase (nA) | Gain (Spike/S) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 68.52 ± 0.33 | 53.06 ± 0.889 | 43.36 ± 0.201 | 0.33 ± 0.071 | 1.9 ± 0.7 |
| HIV-1 Tat 24 h | 68.56 ± 0.63 | 53.04 ± 1.12 | 43.7 ± 0.466 | 0.31 ± 0.032 | 5.9 ± 0.6 |
| t test | 0.956 | 0.989 | 0.522 | 0.543 |
|
The Tat peptide was added to the cultures, and electrophysiological parameters were tested at 24 h