Overflow, first-sight, and vanishing point distances in visual imagery.

The relationship between the size of a familiar object and the distances at which it is imaged is examined in three experiments. The distance at which an imaged object overflows the visual field is linearly related to object size, a result consistent with the size-distance invariance hypothesis (Kosslyn, 1980). The distance at which an object is initially imaged, first-sight distance, is related to the object size by a power function with an exponent less than 1. In addition, time required to scan from the first-sight to the overflow distance increases as a function of the difference between the two distance estimates. The distance at which an imaged object becomes too small to be identified, vanishing point distance, is related to object size by a power function with an exponent less than 1. This result does not support predictions made from the size-distance invariance hypothesis or Kosslyn's model of visual imagery. Implications for a theory of visual imagery and memory are discussed.