Literature DB >> 29727905

Detection of clinically relevant serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy: results from seven cooperating centers within the German colorectal screening program.

Christoph Schramm1, Katharina Janhsen2, Jan-Hinnerk Hofer3, Hans Toermer4, Annette Stelzer5, Frank Stenschke6, Michael Stollenwerk7, Ingo Scheller8, Sonja Lang1, Tobias Goeser1, Hans-Michael Steffen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serrated polyps have been recognized as precursors of colorectal cancer (CRC) via the serrated pathway. Endoscopic detection and histopathological evaluation of serrated polyps are challenging. The aims of this study were to determine detection rates of the recently proposed entity of clinically relevant serrated polyps (crSPs) and to identify factors that influence their detection in a primary colonoscopy screening cohort.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed average-risk screening colonoscopies performed at a tertiary academic hospital and six community-based private practices in Germany between 01/01/2012 and 14/12/2016. Exclusion criteria were age < 50 years, conditions with increased risk for CRC (e. g. inflammatory bowel disease, history of CRC, hereditary cancer syndromes), and incomplete procedures. CrSPs were defined as serrated polyps ≥ 10 mm and/or > 5 mm located proximally to the splenic flexure. Conventional adenomas were defined as adenomas excluding serrated polyps.
RESULTS: A total of 4161 colonoscopies from average-risk individuals were included (median age 62 years [interquartile range 56 - 69]; 48.6 % male). CrSPs were detected in 6.9 %, with a mean detection rate of 4.7 % (95 % confidence interval 2.3 % - 7.2 %). Detection rates ranged from 0 % to 16.2 %. In multivariate analysis, simultaneous detection of conventional adenomas and an endoscopist adenoma detection rate of ≥ 25 % were significantly associated with increased detection of crSPs, with odds ratios of 1.43 (95 %CI 1.11 - 1.85; P = 0.01) and 7.35 (95 %CI 4.43 - 12.19; P < 0.001). The individual endoscopist's detection rate for conventional adenomas and crSPs were significantly correlated (r = 0.54, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Detection rates for crSPs differed between participating endoscopists. However, individual skills to detect polypoid lesions have a relevant bearing on the detection rate of crSPs. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29727905     DOI: 10.1055/a-0598-4477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  8 in total

1.  Histopathological and epidemiological findings of colonoscopy screening in a population with an average risk of colorectal cancer in Kuwait.

Authors:  Hassan B Abdelnaby; Ali A Abuhussein; Ahmed M Fouad; Wafaa A Alhashash; Abdulrahman S Aldousari; Ahmed M Abdelaleem; Marcus Edelhamre; Maha H Shahin; Mohammed Faisal
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.485

2.  Clinically significant serrated polyp detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; William Hisey; Todd A Mackenzie; Christina M Robinson; Amitabh Srivastava; Reinier G S Meester; Lynn F Butterly
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 10.396

3.  Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals.

Authors:  Junjie Huang; Paul S F Chan; Tiffany W Y Pang; Peter Choi; Xiao Chen; Veeleah Lok; Zhi-Jie Zheng; Martin C S Wong
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-02-19

Review 4.  Sessile serrated lesion detection rates during average risk screening colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.

Authors:  Madhav Desai; Joseph C Anderson; Michael Kaminski; Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar; Jihan Fathallah; Cesare Hassan; David Lieberman; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-04-13

Review 5.  Serrated Colorectal Lesions: An Up-to-Date Review from Histological Pattern to Molecular Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Martino Mezzapesa; Giuseppe Losurdo; Francesca Celiberto; Salvatore Rizzi; Antonio d'Amati; Domenico Piscitelli; Enzo Ierardi; Alfredo Di Leo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population-implications for colorectal cancer screening?

Authors:  Vidit Lall; Ali Galalah Mostafa Ismail; Oyekoya Taiwo Ayonrinde
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin Bürger; Marko Weber; Iver Petersen; Andreas Stallmach; Carsten Schmidt
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Higher adenoma detection, sessile serrated lesion detection and proximal sessile serrated lesion detection are associated with physician specialty and performance on Direct Observation of Procedural Skills.

Authors:  Jennifer Telford; Lovedeep Gondara; Steven Pi; Laura Gentile; Robert Enns
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.