Literature DB >> 29727440

Proteomic analysis of watery saliva secreted by white-backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera.

Yu-Tong Miao1,2, Yao Deng1,2, Hao-Kang Jia1,2, Yu-Di Liu1,2, Mao-Lin Hou1,2.   

Abstract

The white-backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera, is a phloem sap feeder that secretes watery and gelling saliva during feeding. In this study, we identified the major proteins in watery saliva of S. furcifera by shotgun LC-MS/MS analysis combined with transcriptomic analysis. A total of 161 proteins were identified, which were divided into 8 function categories, including enzymes, transporter, calcium ion binding protein, salivary sheath protein, cytoskeleton protein, DNA-, RNA-, and protein-binding or regulating proteins, other non-enzyme proteins and unknown proteins. Gene expression pattern of 11 secretory proteins were analyzed by real time quantitative-PCR. We detected the mucin-like protein, which had a unique expression level in salivary gland, most likely to be a candidate effector involved in regulation of plant defense. This study identified the watery saliva component of S. furcifera and it provided a list of proteins which may play a role in interaction between S. furcifera and rice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29727440      PMCID: PMC5935387          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Saliva is an important biochemical interface determining the compatibility between sap-sucking insects and their host plants [1, 2]. The saliva includes bioactive compounds that have a range of functions from degrading plant cell and digesting nutrients to eliciting or inhibiting plant defense [3]. Hemipterans secrete two types of saliva: gelling saliva and watery saliva. Gelling saliva is used to form salivary sheath in order to facilitate stylet penetration, while watery saliva involves in the regulation of plant defense [4]. White-backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera, a critical phloem sap feeder, causes considerable damage by sucking plant sap and transmitting plant viral diseases [5]. It also secretes gelling and watery saliva during feeding process like other hemipterans. Previous studies have detected the saliva composition in many species of aphids [1, 6–9], Nephotettix cincticeps [10], Lygus Hesperus [11] and Nilaparvata lugens [4, 12]. Huang et al. [13] compared the secreted saliva composition of three planthopper species and revealed the ubiquitous and specific saliva compounds in different insects. Li et al. [14] sequenced and assembled the transcriptome of S. furcifera salivary gland, laying the foundation of research on saliva of S. furcifera. In this study, shotgun liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was carried out to identify the watery saliva component of S. furcifera, identification of salivary protein was combined with transcriptome of S. furcifera and N. lugens salivary gland. We quantified the relative expression of predicted secretory proteins and detected many salivary proteins that may modulate plant defense. This study exhibits an overview of S. furcifera salivary proteins and makes it possible to understand the mechanism of interaction between white-backed planthopper and rice. Moreover, we make an attempt to exploit the candidate effectors in S. furcifera, which may provide a new target for pest management.

Materials and methods

Insects

The S. furcifera populations were originally collected from Xing'an County, Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China, in 2013, which is the Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pests of Guilin/Guilin Branch, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The field studied did not involve endangered or protected species, and no specific permissions were required for these activities in this station. The insects were reared on susceptible rice TN1. The colony was maintained in insect cages in a thermostat at 27 ± 1°C and 80 ± 10% RH, under a 16:8 L: D photoperiod.

Collection and concentration of watery saliva

Each saliva collection container was prepared by stretching two layers of Parafilm over one side of a sterile glass tube (4 cm × 8 cm) with 200 μL 15% sucrose diet. 50 S. furcifera adults were held in each tube and we collected 8 000 adults in total. To attract the insects and keep humid, another side of the tube was wrapped up with a piece of wet black cloth. The collection tubes were placed in a thermostat at 27 ± 1°C and 80 ± 10% RH, under a 16:8 L: D photoperiod. After 24 h of stylet-probing and salivary discharging by the insects, collection tubes were removed from the thermostat. Diet was collected under sterile conditions by making a small incision in the Parafilm with an injector needle and pouring the stylet-probed diet into sterile centrifuge tubes with pipette. Saliva collection was conserved under -80°C. The collection of saliva was centrifuged at 7 000 g at 4°C for 30 min to remove the impurity and deposit. The supernatant was ultrafiltered with 3 kDa molecular weight cut offs (Amicon-4 Ultra; Millipore, MA, USA), and then concentrated by adding fivefold volume of trichloroacetic acid/acetone (1/9) solution. After incubating at -20°C for 4 h and centrifuging at 6 000 g at 4°C for 40 min, the supernatant was removed and the precipitation was washed 3 times with chilled acetone. Sample was dissolved in SDT buffer (4% sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), 100 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT, Bio-Rad), pH 7.6) and incubated in hot water for 15 min and centrifuged at 14 000 g for 40 min.

Protein digestion

Filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) method [15] was used for protein digestion. 30 μL protein sample was added to 100 mM DTT and incubated in hot water for 5 min. After adding 200 μL UA buffer (8 M urea (Bio-Rad), 150 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0), the mixture was transferred to 10 kDa ultrafiltration centrifuge tube (Sartorius, Gottingen, Germany) and centrifuged twice at 14 000 g for 15 min. 100 μL IAA buffer (100 mM IAA in UA) was added to the tube and incubated in dark for 30 min at room temperature after vortexing for 1 min at 600 rpm. Then centrifuge at 14 000 g for 15 min. Sample was added 100 μL UA buffer and centrifuged at 14 000 g for 15 min. Perform this procedure twice. Then sample was digested with 1 μg trypsin (Promega, Madison, USA) in 40 μL 100 mM NH4HCO3 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) buffer. After vortexing for 1 min at 600 rpm, the mixture was reacted for 16–18 h at 37°C. Sample was centrifuged at 14 000 g for 15 min and transferred to a new collection tube. 40 μL 25 mM NH4HCO3 was added to the tube and then centrifuged at 14 000 g for 15 min to collect filtrate. C18 Cartridge (Sigma) was used to desalinate the peptides. 15 μL 0.1% formic acid (FA, Sigma) was added after lyophilizing the peptides. Peptides were qualified at OD280.

LC/MS-MS analysis

LC/MS-MS was performed on an Easy nLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) coupled with Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). 6 μL digested peptides were used for LC/MS-MS analysis. The mobile phases A was 0.1% FA/H2O and mobile phases B was 0.1% FA/H2O and 84% acetonitrile (ACN, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)/H2O. The peptides were loaded in C18-reversed phase column (Thermo Scientific Acclaim PepMap100, 100 μm × 2 cm, nanoViper C18) and separated in analytical column (Thermo scientific EASY column, 10 cm, ID 75 μm, 3 μm, C18-A2) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The liquid phase gradient was as follows: 0% B to 55% B at 0–110 min, 55% B to 100% B at 110–115 min and 100% B at 115–120 min. Peptide separations were analyzed using a Q Exactive mass spectrometer by dynamically choosing the 20 most abundant ions from one full mass scan (300–1800 m/z) for high-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentation. Normalized collision energy was 27 eV and dynamic exclusion was 60 s. Under fill ratio was defined as 0.1%. First level of mass spectrum resolution was 70 000 at m/z 200 and second level was 17 500 at m/z 200. Automatic gain control (AGC) target was 3e6.

Protein identification

MS/MS spectra were searched using Maxquant software (Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry in Martinsried, Germany, version 1.3.0.5) against three databases: (1) the public Uniprot database with parameters set for Auchenorrhyncha (http://www.uniprot.org, 16 168 coding protein sequences); (2) transcriptomic database of S. furcifera salivary gland (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra, accession number SRR3211109); and (3) transcriptomic database of N. lugens salivary gland (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra, accession number SRR5149721). For protein identification, search parameters were as follows: (1) enzyme, trypsin; (2) max missed cleavages, 2; (3) MS/MS tolerance, 20 ppm; (4) fixed modifications, carbamidomethyl (C); (5) variable modifications, oxidation (M), acetyl (protein N-term); (6) database pattern: reverse; (7) protein and peptide false discovery rate (FDR), ≤0.01.

Bioinformatic analysis

Gene Ontology (GO) annotations of identified proteins were assigned according to information available in the Swiss-Prot/TrEMBL (http://www.uniprot.org/) and Gene Ontology database (http://geneontology.org/). MS-identified proteins were categorized by molecular function, biological process and cellular component. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway of identified proteins was performed by BlastKOALA in KEGG database (http://www.kegg.jp/). Signal peptide was determined by SignalP 4.1 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/). Subcelluar localization was predicted by TargetP 1.1 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/). THMHH Server v. 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ TMHMM/) was used to predict transmembrane helices in proteins. Protein domains were determined by Pfam version 31.0 (http://pfam.xfam.org/).

Prediction of secretory protein and amplification of candidate sequence

Probable secretory proteins were predicted by signal peptide and transmembrane domain. In eukaryotes, there are two cases for secretory proteins: (1) presence of a signal peptide and absence of transmembrane domain; (2) presence of a signal peptide and a transmembrane domain, and meanwhile, the transmembrane domain was in range of the signal peptide [9]. Proteins qualified the conditions were searched in the transcriptomic database of S. furcifera salivary gland and verified using blastx to search for similar sequences in NCBI non-redundant protein database with default parameters. The open reading frame (ORF) of each candidate gene was determined using the ExPASY Translate Tool (http://web.expasy.org/translate/). Gene-specific primers (S1 Table) designed by Primer Premier 5.0 were used to clone the complete ORF or partial sequences of each salivary protein gene. The total RNA from S. furcifera adult was extracted by using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, MA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Template cDNA was synthesized using the Fast Quant RT kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). The PCR products were cloned into the pEASY-T1 vector (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) and the insert was sequenced with standard M13 primers.

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for gene expression analysis

To investigate the tissue-, developmental stage- and sex-specific expression patterns of S. furcifera secretory protein genes, real-time qRCR was conducted using an ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The tissues including salivary gland, head (without salivary gland), gut, testis, ovary and remaining body were dissected from S. furcifera adults under an anatomical lens (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) with microforceps (Shanghai Medical Instruments Ltd., Corp.) in chilled 1×Phosphate Buffered Saline (1×PBS) solution (pH 7.2, Life Technologies Corporation, NY, USA). Different developmental stages of S. furcifera including egg, 1st-2nd instar nymphs, 3rd-4th instar nymphs, 5th instar nymphs, newly emerged female and male adults, and female and male adults after molting for 5 days were collected. For tissues, total RNA was isolated using the PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Total RNA of the whole insect was extracted by using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen). Gene-specific primers (S2 Table) were designed using primer3 web (version 4.0.0) (http://primer3.ut.ee/) and Beacon Designer 7.90, and the cDNA was prepared according to the instruction. The S. furcifera housekeeping gene Ribosomal protein L9 (GeneBank accession number KP735523) and Ribosomal protein L10 (GeneBank accession number KP735524) were used as internal control [16]. The specificity and efficiency of each primer was validated by analyzing standard curves with a fivefold cDNA dilution series. Each qPCR reaction was conducted in a 20 μl mixture containing 10 μl of Bester® SybrGreen qPCR mastermix (DBI® Bioscience, Germany), 0.4 μl of each primer (10 μM), 0.04 μl of 50 × ROX Reference Dye, 4 μl of sample cDNA and 5.16 μl of sterilized H2O. The first-strand cDNA and a no-reverse-transcription control were used as templates for three biological replicates under the following reaction program: an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 31 s, melt curves stages at 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min, and 95°C for 15 s. Relative quantification of salivary protein genes in different tissues and developmental stages was performed with the 2-ΔΔCt method [17]. Data analysis was performed using the SPSS Statistics 20.0 software (IBM SPSS Statistics Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A one-way nested analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05) were used to calculate the relative expression of each target gene. The values were presented as the mean ± SE when applicable.

Results

Identification of proteins of watery saliva in S. furcifera

A total of 161 proteins were identified from S. furcifera secreted watery saliva by shotgun LC-MS/MS analysis (Table 1). According to their functions, the identified proteins were divided into 8 categories: (1) enzymes including oxidoreductases, hydrolases, peptidases, proteases, transferases, lyases, isomerases, ligases and ATP synthases; (2) transporter including ABC transporter, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) -Golgi transporter, ion transporter, Golgi transporter, lipid transporter, lysosome transporter, protein transporter and vacuolar transporter; (3) calcium ion binding protein; (4) putative sheath protein; (5) cytoskeleton protein; (6) DNA-, RNA-, and protein-binding or regulating proteins; (7) other non-enzyme proteins such as ubiquitin, antigen, chaperone protein, ribosomal protein, heat shock protein and signal transduction protein; (8) unknown protein.
Table 1

Summarizes the proteins of watery saliva of S. furcifera identified by LC-MS/MS.

Protein identificationNo. of unique peptidesaProtein domainbTHMHHcTargetPdSignalPeFunction group
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 122Cytochrome C and Quinol oxidase polypeptide I12SYesOxidoreductases
NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 62plastoquinone oxidoreductase chain 64SYesOxidoreductases
NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 33NADH-ubiquinone/plastoquinone oxidoreductase, chain 33SYesOxidoreductases
NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 21Proton-conducting membrane transporter5SYesOxidoreductases
Cytochrome P450 CYP419A11Cytochrome P4500/NoOxidoreductases
Cytochrome b3Cytochromeb (C-terminal)/b6/petD Cytochrome b/b6/petB; Cytochrome b(N-terminal)/b6/petB4SNoOxidoreductases
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 21Cytochrome C oxidase subunit II, periplasmic domain; Cytochrome C oxidase subunit II, transmembrane domain2SNoOxidoreductases
NADH dehydrogenase subunit 61/4SYesOxidoreductases
Peptidylglycine α-hydroxylating monooxygenase1Copper type II ascorbatedependent monooxygenase, C-terminal domain; Copper type II ascorbate-dependent monooxygenase, N-terminal domain1SYesOxidoreductases
Inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase1IMP dehydrogenase / GMP reductase domain; CBS domain0/NoOxidoreductases
Maestro heat-like repeat-containing protein family member 11/0SNoOxidoreductases
Aldo-keto reductase1Aldo/keto reductase family0/NoOxidoreductases
Uncharacterized protein LOC1001656971/0/NoOxidoreductases
Isolate 9 chitinase1Glycosyl hydrolases family 180MNoHydrolases
Carboxylesterase2Carboxylesterase family0SYesHydrolases
Non-lysosomal glucosylceramidase1Glycosyl-hydrolase family 116, catalytic region; beta-glucosidase 2, glycosyl-hydrolase family 116 N-term1/NoHydrolases
Dicer 21PAZ domain; Ribonuclease III domain0/NoHydrolases
Ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein1Ankyrin repeats (3 copies); Ankyrin repeats (many copies)0/NoHydrolases
Uncharacterized protein LOC105391939 isoform X31Phospholipase A21/NoHydrolases
Hypothetical protein D910_096603Endoribonuclease XendoU0SNoHydrolases
Uncharacterized protein LOC1001643521/0/NoHydrolases
Hypothetical protein ANCCEY_116051/0/NoHydrolases
Placental protein 111Endoribonuclease XendoU1MNoHydrolases
Plancitoxin-1 isoform X12Deoxyribonuclease II1SNoHydrolases
GA19137 isoform A1USP8 dimerisation domain; Rhodanese-like domain; Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase0/NoHydrolases
N-acetylglucosaminyl-phosphatidylinositol de-N-acetylase1GlcNAc-PI de-N-acetylase1SYesHydrolases
Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 71MATH domain; Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase; ICP0-binding domain of Ubiquitin-specific protease 7; Ubiquitin-specific protease C-terminal0/NoHydrolases
Uncharacterized family 31 glucosidase KIAA1161 isoform X11Glycosyl hydrolases family 310/NoHydrolases
Constitutive coactivator of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor1/0/NoHydrolases
Endonuclease-reverse transcriptase1/0/NoHydrolases
Neprilysin-11-like isoform X41Peptidase family M131SNoPeptidases
Xaa-Pro dipeptidase1FAST kinase-like protein, subdomain 10/NoPeptidases
Lon protease-like protein1ATP-dependent protease La (LON) substrate-binding domain; ATPase family associated with various cellular activities (AAA); Lon protease (S16) C-terminal proteolytic domain0MNoPeptidases
Serine protease 61Trypsin1SYesProteases
Stubble-21Trypsin0/NoProteases
Activated CDC42 kinase 11GTPase binding; Protein tyrosine kinase0/NoTransferases
ATP citrate lyase isoform X11ATP-grasp domain; ATP citrate lyase citrate-binding; CoA binding domain; CoA-ligase; Citrate synthase, C-terminal domain0/NoTransferases
Reverse transcriptase3Reverse transcriptase (RNA-dependent DNA polymerase)0/NoTransferases
Hypothetical protein D910_104431Reverse transcriptase (RNA-dependent DNA polymerase)0/NoTransferases
Uncharacterized protein LOC1055565071/0/NoTransferases
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2C11UDP-glucoronosyl and UDP-glucosyl transferase1/NoTransferases
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETMAR1/0/NoTransferases
Protein purity of essence isoform X41E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UBR40/NoTransferases
RNA-directed DNA polymerase from mobile element jockey-like1/0/NoTransferases
Hypothetical protein L798_090821Ring finger domain;CUE domain0/NoTransferases
FAST kinase domain-containing protein 11FAST kinase-like protein, subdomain 20/NoTransferases
Carbonic anhydrase 21Eukaryotic-type carbonic anhydrase1SYesLyases
Cytoplasmic aconitate hydratase-like1Aconitase family (aconitate hydratase); Aconitase C-terminal domain0/NoLyases
Ornithine decarboxylase1Pyridoxal-dependent decarboxylase, pyridoxal binding domain; Pyridoxal-dependent decarboxylase, C-terminal sheet domain0/NoLyases
Sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase1Pyridoxal-dependent decarboxylase conserved domain0/NoLyases
Protein disulfide-isomerase1Thioredoxin0SYesIsomerases
ATP-binding domain-containing protein 41Diphthamide synthase; Endoribonuclease L-PSP0/NoLigases
CTP synthase1CTP synthase N-terminus; Glutamine amidotransferase class-I1/NoLigases
ATP synthase F0 subunit 83/1SYesATP synthases
ATP synthase subunit a1ATP synthase A chain5SNoATP synthases
ATP synthase protein 81ATP synthase protein 81SYesATP synthases
Vacuolar ATP synthase subunit E1ATP synthase (E/31 kDa) subunit0/YesATP synthases
ATP synthase-coupling factor 61Mitochondrial ATP synthase coupling factor 60MNoATP synthases
Uncharacterized protein LOC1006324261Iron-sulphur cluster biosynthesis0/NoATP synthases
ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 4-like protein3ABC-2 type transporter; ABC transporter7/NoABC transporter
ATP-binding cassette sub-family D member 2-like protein1ABC transporter transmembrane region 2; ABC transporter4/NoABC transporter
ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 71ABC transporter transmembrane region0MNoABC transporter
ABC protein subfamily ABCH1ABC transporter; ABC-2 family transporter protein5/NoABC transporter
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 isoform X11ABC transporter transmembrane region; ABC transporter16SYesABC transporter
Sly1-like protein1Sec1 family0/NoEndoplasmic reticulum (ER)–Glogi transporter
Uncharacterized protein LOC1001655751/1SNoIon transporter
Piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 2 isoform X71Piezo non-specific cation channel, R-Ras-binding domain; Piezo31SYesIon transporter
F-box/LRR-repeat protein 71F-box-like; Methyl-CpG binding domain0/NoIon transporter
Organic cation transporter protein isoform X21Sugar (and other) transporter10SYesIon transporter
Uncharacterized protein LOC1055681571/0/NoIon transporter
Golgin subfamily A member 41GRIP domain0/NoGolgi transporter
Apolipophorin1von Willebrand factor type D domain0/NoLipid transporter
Lipophorin precursor1Lipoprotein amino terminal region; Domain of unknown function (DUF1943); Domain of Unknown Function (DUF1081); von Willebrand factor type D domain0SYesLipid transporter
Vitellogenin1Lipoprotein amino terminal region; Domain of unknown function (DUF1943); von Willebrand factor type D domain0SYesLipid transporter
Uncharacterized protein LOC1001197221Saposin A-type domain; Saposin-like type B, region 1; Saposin-like type B, region 22SYesLysosome transporter
Vam6/Vps39-like protein1CNH domain; Vacuolar sorting protein 39 domain 1; Vacuolar sorting protein 39 domain 20/NoLysosome transporter
Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 28-like protein1VPS28 protein0/NoLysosome transporter
Run and tbc1 domain-containing protein1Rab-GTPase-TBC domain0/NoLysosome transporter
Hypothetical protein L798_051061Thioredoxin2SYesProtein transporter
Charged multivesicular body protein 31Snf70/NoVacuolar transporter
Calexcitin-1 isoform X11EF hand; Deoxyribonuclease II0SNo;Calcium ion binding protein
Hypothetical protein TcasGA2_TC0048551LETM1-like protein1MNoCalcium ion binding protein
EF-hand domain containing protein1EF hand0/NoCalcium ion binding protein
Mucin-like protein11/1SYesSheath proteins
Actin2Actin0/NoCytoskeleton protein
Myosin-IIIa1IQ calmodulin-binding motif; Myosin head (motor domain)0/NoCytoskeleton protein
Kinesin light chain1Tetratricopeptide repeat0/NoCytoskeleton protein
Microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X41Spectrin repeat; EF-hand domain pair; Growth-Arrest-Specific Protein 2 Domain0/NoCytoskeleton proteins
Kinesin-like protein KIF21A isoform X21Kinesin motor domain; WD domain, G-beta repeat0/NoCytoskeleton proteins
Cordon-bleu protein-like 11/0/NoCytoskeleton protein
Zinc finger protein 239-like1Zinc finger, C2H2 type; C2H2-type zinc finger0/NoZinc finger protein
Zinc finger matrin-type protein1/0/NoZinc finger protein
Apterous a1LIM domain; Homeobox domain0/NoTranscription factors
Ecdysteroid receptor1Ligand-binding domain of nuclear hormone receptor; Zinc finger, C4 type (two domains)0/NoTranscription factors
Transcriptional regulator ATRX-like1SNF2 family N-terminal domain; Helicase conserved C-terminal domain0/NoTranscription factors
RNA polymerase-associated protein CTR9-like protein1Tetratricopeptide repeat0/NoTranscription factors
Conserved hypothetical protein1Leo1-like protein0/NoTranscription factors
Transcription initiation factor IIA subunit 11Transcription factor IIA, alpha/beta subunit0MNoTranscription factors
Hypothetical protein L798_071651MH1 domain0/NoTranscription factors
Hypothetical protein L798_074691/0MNoTranscription factors
Elongation factor Tu1Elongation factor Tu GTP binding domain; Elongation factor Tu domain 2; Elongation factor Tu C-terminal domain0/NoTranslation factors
Elongation factor G21Elongation factor Tu; GTP binding domain0MNoTranslation factors
Cryptochrome 21DNA photolyase; FAD binding domain of DNA photolyase0/NoDNA repair and recombination protein
Thyroid receptor-interacting protein 111GRIP domain0/NoDNA repair
Uncharacterized protein LOC1035165811/0MNoDNA binding
Cold shock domain-containing protein E11'Cold-shock' DNA-binding domain0/NoDNA binding
HMG box-containing protein 11/0/NoDNA binding
AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 4B1RBB1NT (NUC162) domain; ARID/BRIGHT DNA binding domain0/NoDNA binding
Nucleoprotein TPR1/0/NoDNA binding
La-related protein 1B1/0/NomRNA biosynthesis
Mitochondrial fission protein1Fis1 C-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat; Fis1 N-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat1SNoMitochondrial biogenesis
ESF1 homolog1NUC153 domain0/NoNucleotide binding
Bromodomain-containing protein 71Bromodomain; Domain of unknown function (DUF3512)0/NoProtein binding
Bromodomain and WD repeat-containing protein 21/0/NoProtein binding
Chaoptin1/6MNoProtein binding
Kazrin-A1SAM domain (Sterile alpha motif)0/NoProtein binding
Sorting nexin-171/0/NoProtein binding
Ring finger protein 1601Ring finger domain0/NoRing finger protein
Cisplatin resistance-associated overexpressed protein1LUC7 N_terminus0MNoRNA binding
Teneurin-3-like1/0MNoRNA binding
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X11R3H domain; SUZ domain0/NoRNA binding
Coiled-coil domain-containing protein 121cwf18 pre-mRNA splicing factor0/NoSpliceosome
Transcription elongation regulator 11WW domain0/NoSpliceosome
Integrator complex subunit 1 isoform X11/0/NoSpliceosome
Anaphase-promoting complex subunit1/0/NoUbiquitin
CD109 antigen-like1MG2 domain; Alpha-2-macroglobulin family N-terminal region; Alpha-2-macroglobulin family; Alpha-macro-globulin thiol-ester bond-forming region; A-macroglobulin complement component; A-macroglobulin receptor0SYesAntigen
Tubulin-specific chaperone C1Tubulin-specific chaperone C N-terminal domain; Tubulin binding cofactor C0/NoChaperone protein
Interaptin isoform X21/1SYesRibosome-binding protein
Notchless protein homolog 1-like1NLE (NUC135) domain; WD domain, G-beta repeat0/NoRibosome biogenesis
mRNA turnover protein 4 homolog1Ribosomal protein L100/NoRibosome biogenesis
Hypothetical protein KGM_128791RNA recognition motif. (a.k.a. RRM, RBD, or RNP domain)0/NoRibosome biogenesis
Putative RNA-binding protein 191RNA recognition motif. (a.k.a. RRM, RBD, or RNP domain)0/NoRibosome biogenesis
Nucleolar complex protein 3-like protein1Nucleolar complex-associated protein; CBF/Mak21 family0/NoRibosome biogenesis
30S ribosomal protein S21Ribosomal protein S20/NoRibosomal protein
39S ribosomal protein L381Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein0/NoRibosomal protein
Uncharacterized protein LOC1055584741Ribosomal protein S12/S230/NoRibosomal protein
Heat shock cognate 70 protein1Hsp70 protein0/NoHeat shock protein
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform X41/0/NoSignal transduction protein
Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 31MH2 domain0MNoSignal transduction protein
Protein numb1Phosphotyrosine interaction domain (PTB/PID)0/NoSignal transduction protein
Protein numb-like1NUMB domain0MNoSignal transduction protein
Methoprene-tolerant protein1PAS domain0/NoUnknown
Salivap-51/0/NoUnknown
Cchamide 11/1SYesUnknown
Uncharacterized protein LOC1056723841Putative peptidase (DUF1758)0/NoUnknown
Uncharacterized protein LOC1056925611/3/NoUnknown
Protein Daple1/0/NoUnknown
Rhogtpase1BTB/POZ domain0/NoUnknown
Uncharacterized protein LOC105149357 isoform X11/0/NoUnknown
Collagen alpha-1(III) chain1/0/NoUnknown
Glutamate receptor ionotropic1/0/NoUnknown
Protein retinal degeneration B isoform X31/0/NoUnknown
Hypothetical protein L798_111301/0MNoUnknown
Triple functional domain1/0/NoUnknown
Uncharacterized protein LOC1006805111/0/NoUnknown
Hypothetical protein TcasGA2_TC0103041/0/NoUnknown
Hypothetical protein1/0SYesUnknown
Uncharacterized protein LOC103508838 isoform X11/0/NoUnknown
Uncharacterized protein KIAA1143 homolog1Domain of unknown function (DUF4604)0MNoUnknown
Hypothetical protein L798_032131/0/NoUnknown
Glucocorticoid-induced transcript 1 protein-like1Protein Family FAM1170MNoUnknown

a The unique matched peptides are shown in S3 Table.

b Protein domains were determined by Pfam version 31.0 (http://pfam.xfam.org/)).

c THMHH Server v. 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) was used to predict transmembrane helices in proteins.

d Subcelluar localization was predicted by TargetP 1.1 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/). M stands for mitochondrial targeting peptide. S stands for secretory pathway signal peptide. “/” stands for other.

eSignal peptide was determined by SignalP 4.1 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/).

a The unique matched peptides are shown in S3 Table. b Protein domains were determined by Pfam version 31.0 (http://pfam.xfam.org/)). c THMHH Server v. 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) was used to predict transmembrane helices in proteins. d Subcelluar localization was predicted by TargetP 1.1 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/). M stands for mitochondrial targeting peptide. S stands for secretory pathway signal peptide. “/” stands for other. eSignal peptide was determined by SignalP 4.1 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/). Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis were used to identify the potential functions of S. furcifera water salivary proteins. For GO annotation, saliva components were classified at the second level under three root GO domains: biological process, molecular function and cellular component (Fig 1). The most two categories were metabolic process (including 70 proteins) and cellular process (69) in biological process, binding (75) and catalytic activity (71) in molecular function, cell (55) and cell part (54) in cellular component. KEGG pathways involved in the salivary proteins were divided into 5 branches: metabolism, genetic information processing, environmental information processing, cellular processes and organismal systems (Fig 2). Most proteins were distributed in metabolism (34) and genetic information processing (33) at the first level, while the majority proteins were related to energy metabolism (14), transcription (14) and transport and catabolism (15) at the second level.
Fig 1

Gene Ontology classification of S. furcifera water salivary proteins.

Saliva components were classified at the second level under three root GO domains: biological process, molecular function and cellular component.

Fig 2

KEGG pathway classification of S. furcifera salivary proteins.

The proteins according to KEGG pathway involved was divided into five branches: A. Metabolism; B. Genetic information processing; C. Environmental information processing; D. Cellular processes; E. Organismal systems.

Gene Ontology classification of S. furcifera water salivary proteins.

Saliva components were classified at the second level under three root GO domains: biological process, molecular function and cellular component.

KEGG pathway classification of S. furcifera salivary proteins.

The proteins according to KEGG pathway involved was divided into five branches: A. Metabolism; B. Genetic information processing; C. Environmental information processing; D. Cellular processes; E. Organismal systems.

Predicting, cloning and sequencing of the secretory proteins

Among the 161 proteins, 21 proteins have a putative secretory peptide and no transmembrane domain or the only transmembrane domain was in range of the signal peptide, suggesting secretory proteins. Other proteins without signal peptide indicate unknown secretory mechanism. The putative secretory proteins were searched in the transcriptome of S. furcifera salivary glands, 11 proteins were found to have the complete ORF, suggesting reliable for sequencing and cloning. Other proteins are not found in the transcriptome or only have a short fragment, so we excluded these proteins. All of the 11 salivary secretory proteins were manually searched by blastx program and then named according to the highest protein similarities with the high amio acid identities range from 54% to 100% in National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (Table 2). Complete ORFs of 9 proteins were verified by cloning and sequencing, while other two proteins were confirmed with partial ORF. The data were deposited on NCBI (accession number from MF189025 to MF189034) except mucin-like protein, which was the same as the Accession number KX670544.
Table 2

Genes of secretory protein identified in S. furcifera watery saliva.

Gene nameAccession numberQuery length (bp)ORF (aa)CompletenessBlastx annotationScoreE-valueIdentity
Peptidylglycine α-hydroxylating monooxygenaseMF1890251044347CompletePeptidylglycine alpha-hydroxylating monooxygenase [Bactrocera dorsalis]4596e-15969%
CarboxylesteraseMF1890261650549CompleteCarboxylesterase [Nilaparvata lugens]554054%
Neprilysin-11-like isoform X4MF1890271452483CompleteNeprilysin-11-like isoform X4 [Nasonia vitripennis]584058%
Serine protease 6MF189028819272CompleteSerine protease 6 [Nilaparvata lugens]4062e-14176%
Carbonic anhydrase 2MF189029924307CompleteCarbonic anhydrase 2 [Lygus hesperus]3033e-9954%
Protein disulfide-isomeraseMF1890301509502CompleteProtein disulfide-isomerase [Nilaparvata lugens]894095%
Vacuolar ATP synthase subunit EMF189031681226CompleteVacuolar ATP synthase subunit E [Nilaparvata lugens]3782e-13190%
Lipophorin precursorMF1890321555518PartialLipophorin precursor [Nilaparvata lugens]5894086%
VitellogeninMF1890331324441PartialVitellogenin [Laodelphax striatella]2590089%
Calexcitin-1 isoform X1MF189034558185CompleteCalexcitin-1 isoform X1 [Athalia rosae]2656e-8863%
Mucin-like proteinKX6705442160719CompleteMucin-like protein [Sogatella furcifera]7680100%

Tissue, development and sex-specific expression analysis

The expression of 11 secretory salivary protein genes in different tissues (salivary gland, head, gut, testis, ovary and remaining body) and different developmental stages and sexes (egg, 1st-2nd instar nymphs, 3rd-4th instar nymphs, 5th instar nymphs, newly emerged female and male adults, and female and male adults after molting for 5 days) were determined by using qPCR. Figs 3 and 4 showed the results.
Fig 3

Tissue-specific expression of S. furcifera genes encoding salivary proteins.

SG, salivary gland; Head, head without salivary gland; Gut, gut; Te, testis; Ov, ovary; RB, remaining body.

Fig 4

Developmental stage- and sex-specific expression of S. furcifera genes encoding salivary proteins.

Egg, egg period; N1-2, 1st-2nd instar nymphs; N3-4, 3rd-4th instar nymphs; N5, 5th instar nymphs; F1, newly emerged female adults; M1, newly molted male adults; F5, female adults after molting for 5 days; M5, male adults after molting for 5 days.

Tissue-specific expression of S. furcifera genes encoding salivary proteins.

SG, salivary gland; Head, head without salivary gland; Gut, gut; Te, testis; Ov, ovary; RB, remaining body.

Developmental stage- and sex-specific expression of S. furcifera genes encoding salivary proteins.

Egg, egg period; N1-2, 1st-2nd instar nymphs; N3-4, 3rd-4th instar nymphs; N5, 5th instar nymphs; F1, newly emerged female adults; M1, newly molted male adults; F5, female adults after molting for 5 days; M5, male adults after molting for 5 days. Oxidoreductases are common enzymes in insect saliva. These enzymes can detoxify phenolic compounds in plant-defense reactions by changing the redox balance [3]. Oxidoreductase peptidylglycine α-hydroxylating monooxygenase was highly expressed in head, followed by ovary. This enzyme was extensively expressed in all developmental stages and no significant difference between female and male. Hydrolases are related to plant-cell degradation by facilitating stylets penetration and movement in plant cell [3]. Carboxylesterase had the highest transcript level in ovary, followed by salivary gland, and then testis. Other tissues were almost not detected gene expression. This gene was highly expressed in female adult after molting for 5 days, suggesting it may play an important role in reproduction. Proteases (peptidases) generally function as digestive enzymes and are important in detoxification of plant defense compounds [7]. We investigated two proteases in this study. Serine protease 6 had a unique expression in gut, indicating its digestive function. However, neprilysin-11-like isoform X4 was highly expressed in testis, followed by head and remaining body. The developmental stages and sex specific expression pattern between these two enzymes were also different. The expression level of serine protease 6 was increasing along with the development of insect in general except a decline in female adult. Neprilysin-11-like isoform X4 had a significantly high transcript level in newly emerged male adult. Lyases degrade substance without hydrolysis and oxidation and lyases in insect saliva were not widely known [3]. Carbonic anhydrase was expressed in all tissues but highly expressed in gut. Adult expression level of this gene was higher than nymph and male expression was higher than female adult. Adult molting for 5 days was expressed higher than newly emerged adult. We tested an isomerase, protein disulfide-isomerase, which is involved in protein folding and synthesis. This gene was highest expressed in testis and then salivary gland and gut. Protein disulfide-isomerase was expressed in all developmental stages and had the highest expression level in newly emerged male adult. However, the expression decreased significantly in male adult after molting for 5 days, indicating it may function in the male mating with female adult. ATP synthases are related to energy metabolism. Vacuolar ATP synthase subunit E had an extensive expression in all tissues and developmental phases, but it was expressed higher in gut and head than other tissues. Expression level of this gene in male adult was higher than female. Lipophorin precursor and vitellogenin are lipid transport proteins that function in modulating immune responses in insects [18, 19]. They share a similar expression pattern in tissues. They were both expressed highly in remaining body and head. As to developmental stages and sexes, they preform differently. Vitellogenin expressed significantly high in female adult molting for 5 days, indicating an important role in female reproduction. Lipophorin precursor expressed in all developmental stages and the expression level was increasing together with the insect development. Calcium ion binding proteins are recorded in saliva of many aphids. This kind of protein facilitates insects to feed on phloem sap of plants by preventing sieve element occlusion [6]. Calexcitin-1 isoform X1 was mainly expressed in remaining body and testis but hardly expressed in salivary gland. It will be interesting to find how calexcitin enters saliva of S. furcifera. Calexcitin-1 isoform X1 had a higher expression level in newly emerged male and female adult and male expression was higher than female. Mucin-like protein was reported to play an integral role in the formation of salivary sheath [20]. The transcript of this protein was detected at significantly high level in salivary gland but was not detectable in head, gut, testis, ovary and remaining body. It was expressed in all stages and sexes while egg period had the lowest expression level and male adult had the highest one.

Discussion

We investigated the watery saliva component of S. furcifera in an attempt to understand the interaction between the insects and their host plants. This study has identified 161 proteins which have been classified into 8 categories according to the function. Recently, Huang et al. detected 177 proteins in the secreted saliva of S. furcifera. After comparison, we found that 10 salivary proteins in our study were the same with Huang’s research, including salivap-5, plancitoxin-1, golgin subfamily A member 4-like, lipophorin precursor, stubble-2, RNA polymerase-associated protein CTR9-like protein, nucleoprotein TPR, AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 4B, carboxylesterase and vitellogenin. Some similar cytoskeleton proteins like actin, myosin, kinesin-like protein and a transcription factor like elongation factor were also found in our research. However, the majority of identified proteins were different from them, which may be caused by insect geographical population, saliva collection method and LC/MS-MS analysis method. For example, Chaudhary et al. [8] reported saliva of M. euphorbiae obtained in different diet (0.4% resorcinol, 15% sucrose plus amino acids or water) had different compositions. Our investigated salivary proteins will be useful in increasing the existing knowledge of watery saliva of S. furcifera and enriching the saliva composition database of S. furcifera. Some salivary proteins of N. lugens and Laodelphax striatellus that have been found in the study of Huang et al. [13] was also detected in our research, such as carbonic anhydrase, EF-hand domain containing protein, protein disulfide isomerase and mucin-like protein. It is worth mentioning that Huang et al. [20] found the mucin-like protein in N. lugens was necessary in feeding, especially reared on the resistant rice variety. This protein was confirmed to be involved in the formation of salivary sheath and suppression of resistant plant defense [20]. Since secretory proteins are most likely to be candidate effectors that can secrete into plant tissues and modulate plant defense [21, 22, 23], we selected 11 secretory proteins from the proteomic and transcriptomic analysis for intensive study. Peptidylglycine α-hydroxylating monooxygenase (PHM), a copper binding oxidoreductase, was highly expressed in the head of S. furcifera and intensively expressed in all developmental stages. Zabriskie et al. [24] isolated a PHM from heads of honeybees (Apis mellifera) and found the enzyme catalyze the amidation of C-terminal peptides, which play important roles in insect reproduction, development and defense. The research about PHM was rarely conducted in invertebrates. The expression pattern about this gene was firstly reported in sap-sucking insects. It may play the same role in formatting of neuropeptides in head as in mammals, and it works in all developmental stages in S. furcifera. Carboxylesterases (CarEs) occupy crucial roles in detoxification of xenobiotics, degradation of pheromone, neurogenesis and developmental regulations [25]. We found the CarE was highly expressed in ovary, followed by the salivary gland, suggesting its function in regulation of reproduction and detoxification of plant allelochemicals. The significantly high expression level in female after molting for 5 days also verified its important role in reproduction. CarE was previously detected in the saliva of N. lugens [4, 12], while the expression pattern was a little different. CarE was expressed in all tissues, with the highest level in salivary gland and the lowest in ovary [12]. This could be because different families of carboxylesterases were detected in saliva of S. furcifera and N. lugens. Peptidases (proteases) are the protein-hydrolysing enzymes which have been reported in many hemipterans [3]. We detected two secreted peptidases in saliva of S. furcifera. Serine protease 6, acting as digesting and detoxifying enzyme, had a specific expression in gut of S. furcifera and an extensive expression in all developmental stages except egg. Serine protease was detected in saliva of Schizaphis graminum biotype GB-E, GB-G and GB-H other than GB-C (biotype GB-H, GB-G, GB-E, GB-C ranging in virulence from high to low) [6], suggesting its function in detoxification. Serine protease 6 found in saliva of S. furcifera may play a role in preoral digestion. Neprilysins belong to zinc metalloendopeptidase and play an important role in turning off peptide signaling events at the cell surface [26]. Research on neprilysin and neprilysin-like were conducted on Locusta migratoria [27], Drosophila melanogaster [28] and Bactrocera dorsalis [29], but report about this protein in insect saliva was not found. Neprilysin-11-like isoform X4, detected in S. furcifera saliva, was highly expressed in testis and newly emerged male adults, suggesting its role in testis development and spermatogenesis. This result was in accord with expression pattern of neprilysin in B. dorsalis and D. melanogaster. Neprilysin of B. dorsalis was specifically expressed in testis [29] and different types of neprilysin in D. melanogaster were reported to be expressed in malpighian tubules and testis, suggesting roles for the peptidase in excretory function and in spermatogenesis [28]. However, the role of this protein in insect saliva requires further research. Carbonic anhydrase (CA) and vacuolar ATP synthase were responsible for intracellular pH homeostasis [30]. Slaymaker et al. [31] claimed that tobacco chloroplast carbonic anhydrase binds salicylic acid (SA), indicating function in plant defense response. CA was previously detected in saliva of S. graminum [6], Macrosiphum euphorbiae [8] and N. cincticeps [10]. It was also found in midgut of larval Aedes aegypti [32] and malpighian tubules of D. melanogaster [33]. CA in S. furcifera had a highest expression level in gut and relatively high level in testis and salivary gland, while it was specifically expressed in salivary gland in N. lugens [12]. This may be because CA in different species owns different tissue distribution and function. Vacuolar ATP synthase exists in almost all eukaryotic cells functioning in membrane trafficking, cytosolic alkalinization and extracellular acidification [34]. It was highly expressed in gut and head in S. furcifera. Hu et al. [35] found that vacuolar ATPase plays an important role in male reproductive physiological processes in B. dorsalis. CA and vacuolar ATP synthase expression in male adult both were higher than female, indicating more important function in male. These two proteins in saliva of S. furcifera could involve in the regulation of pH homeostasis. Protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) is essential for protein folding [36]. PDI was expressed relatively high in testis and salivary gland in S. furcifera, suggesting its role in regulation of seminal fluid and salivary protein folding. It has also been detected in saliva of Acyrthosiphon pisum [9] and N. lugens [12] previously. Carolan [9] indicated that PDIs were related to an increased yield of salivary proteins. PDI in saliva of S. furcifera may function in synthesis of salivary proteins. Lipophorin precursor and vitellogenin (Vg), function as lipid transporter, were found in saliva of S. furcifera. Lipophorin was reported to act in lipid-based plant defense [6] and previously discovered in water saliva of S. graminum, A. pisum, M. euphorbiae and N. lugens and L. striatellus [1, 4, 6, 8, 13]. Vg is known as a nutritional source for embryonic development [37]. It has been reported in gelling saliva of N. lugens [12]. These two proteins were both expressed highly in remaining body and head. This may be because they were synthesized in fat body, which is abundant in remaining body and head. Lipophorin precursor had a valid expression in all developmental stages while Vg had a significantly high transcript level in female molting for 5 days, indicating its crucial role in reproduction. However, it is still unknown how Vg secretes into the saliva of S. furcifera and what its role in saliva. Calcium ion binding proteins exist in saliva of many sap-sucking insects. Innate plant defense mechanism enables occlusion of sieve-tube element when suffering damage by insects [3]. Calexcitin (CE), a calcium ion binding protein, appears as a Ca2+-activated signaling molecular [38, 39] and involves in suppressing plant defense. CE had a high transcript level in remaining body and testis, and was highly expressed in newly emerged adults, suggesting a role in regulation of mating and reproduction. CE had the lowest transcript level in salivary gland, leaving us the confusion that how it works in inhibiting of plant defense. Mucin-like protein was related to the formation of salivary sheath [4], existing in saliva of N. lugens [4, 12, 13], L. striatellus [13] and N. cincticeps [10]. Huang et al. [12, 20] investigated mucin-like protein had a unique expression in salivary gland of N. lugens and its role in N. lugens virulence and adaptation to host resistance. Shangguan et al. [40] revealed that mucin-like protein of N. lugens can induce plant cell death, the expression of defense-related genes and callose deposition. Expression pattern of mucin-like protein was generally the same in S. furcifera, indicating its function in feeding and interacting with host plant. Male adult had a higher expression than female, suggesting it plays a more important role in male. In conclusion, we investigated the water saliva component in S. furcifera and tested the expression pattern of 11 secretory proteins. Many proteins were expressed relatively high in salivary gland of S. fuicifera, suggesting its role in saliva. While some proteins had a low expression level in salivary gland but were found in saliva, leaving us to find their potential function in saliva. Mucin-like protein was specifically expressed in salivary gland, which is most likely to be an effector functioning in plant defense. Intensive studies are needed to understand the function of this protein.

Primers used for molecular cloning of S. furcifera salivary protein genes.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Primers used in real-time qPCR for gene expression analysis.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Unique peptide sequences of S. furcifera watery saliva proteins identified by LC-MS/MS.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  37 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Comparative analyses of salivary proteins from three aphid species.

Authors:  S Vandermoten; N Harmel; G Mazzucchelli; E De Pauw; E Haubruge; F Francis
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.585

3.  Transcriptome profiling of the testis reveals genes involved in spermatogenesis and marker discovery in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis.

Authors:  D Wei; H-M Li; W-J Yang; D-D Wei; W Dou; Y Huang; J-J Wang
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.585

4.  Calexcitin: a signaling protein that binds calcium and GTP, inhibits potassium channels, and enhances membrane excitability.

Authors:  T J Nelson; S Cavallaro; C L Yi; D McPhie; B G Schreurs; P A Gusev; A Favit; O Zohar; J Kim; S Beushausen; G Ascoli; J Olds; R Neve; D L Alkon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Apolipophorin-III mediates antiplasmodial epithelial responses in Anopheles gambiae (G3) mosquitoes.

Authors:  Lalita Gupta; Ju Young Noh; Yong Hun Jo; Seung Han Oh; Sanjeev Kumar; Mi Young Noh; Yong Seok Lee; Sung-Jae Cha; Sook Jae Seo; Iksoo Kim; Yeon Soo Han; Carolina Barillas-Mury
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Salivary proteins of spider mites suppress defenses in Nicotiana benthamiana and promote mite reproduction.

Authors:  Carlos A Villarroel; Wim Jonckheere; Juan M Alba; Joris J Glas; Wannes Dermauw; Michel A Haring; Thomas Van Leeuwen; Robert C Schuurink; Merijn R Kant
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  Combined transcriptomic/proteomic analysis of salivary gland and secreted saliva in three planthopper species.

Authors:  Hai-Jian Huang; Jia-Bao Lu; Qiao Li; Yan-Yuan Bao; Chuan-Xi Zhang
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Variation in the salivary proteomes of differentially virulent greenbug (Schizaphis graminum Rondani) biotypes.

Authors:  Scott J Nicholson; Gary J Puterka
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Proteome Analysis of Watery Saliva Secreted by Green Rice Leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps.

Authors:  Makoto Hattori; Setsuko Komatsu; Hiroaki Noda; Yukiko Matsumoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hormonal control of the yolk precursor vitellogenin regulates immune function and longevity in honeybees.

Authors:  Gro V Amdam; Zilá L P Simões; Arne Hagen; Kari Norberg; Knut Schrøder; Øvind Mikkelsen; Thomas B L Kirkwood; Stig W Omholt
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.032

View more
  7 in total

1.  Production, composition, and mode of action of the painful defensive venom produced by a limacodid caterpillar, Doratifera vulnerans.

Authors:  Andrew A Walker; Samuel D Robinson; Jean-Paul V Paluzzi; David J Merritt; Samantha A Nixon; Christina I Schroeder; Jiayi Jin; Mohaddeseh Hedayati Goudarzi; Andrew C Kotze; Zoltan Dekan; Andy Sombke; Paul F Alewood; Bryan G Fry; Marc E Epstein; Irina Vetter; Glenn F King
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The salivary gland proteome of root-galling grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) feeding on Vitis spp.

Authors:  Markus W Eitle; James C Carolan; Michaela Griesser; Astrid Forneck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Early Hemocyte Responses upon In Vivo Stimulation with LPS in the Stick Insect Bacillus rossius (Rossi, 1788).

Authors:  Carlotta Bidoli; Andrea Miccoli; Francesco Buonocore; Anna Maria Fausto; Marco Gerdol; Simona Picchietti; Giuseppe Scapigliati
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Sogatella furcifera Saliva Mucin-like Protein Is Required for Feeding and Induces Rice Defences.

Authors:  Yudi Liu; Jinyu Yi; Haokang Jia; Yutong Miao; Maolin Hou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Tripartite parasitic and symbiotic interactions as a possible mechanism of horizontal gene transfer.

Authors:  Chaoyang Zhao; Shaoming Miao; Yanfang Yin; Yanjuan Zhu; Paul Nabity; Raman Bansal; Chenxi Liu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Fungicides Reduce the Abundance of Yeast-like Symbionts and Survival of White-Backed Planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Homoptera: Delphacidae).

Authors:  Kun Pang; Shengzhang Dong; Peiying Hao; Tongtong Chen; Xinlong Wang; Xiaoping Yu; Huafeng Lin
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Secretory RING finger proteins function as effectors in a grapevine galling insect.

Authors:  Chaoyang Zhao; Claude Rispe; Paul D Nabity
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.