Literature DB >> 29726951

Walnut Consumption Alters the Gastrointestinal Microbiota, Microbially Derived Secondary Bile Acids, and Health Markers in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hannah D Holscher1,2, Heather M Guetterman1, Kelly S Swanson2,3, Ruopeng An2, Nirupa R Matthan4, Alice H Lichtenstein4, Janet A Novotny5, David J Baer5.   

Abstract

Background: Epidemiologic data suggest that diets rich in nuts have beneficial health effects, including reducing total and cause-specific mortality from cancer and heart disease. Although there is accumulating preclinical evidence that walnuts beneficially affect the gastrointestinal microbiota and gut and metabolic health, these relations have not been investigated in humans. Objective: We aimed to assess the impact of walnut consumption on the human gastrointestinal microbiota and metabolic markers of health.
Methods: A controlled-feeding, randomized crossover study was undertaken in healthy men and women [n = 18; mean age = 53.1 y; body mass index (kg/m2): 28.8]. Study participants received isocaloric diets containing 0 or 42 g walnuts/d for two 3-wk periods, with a 1-wk washout between diet periods. Fecal and blood samples were collected at baseline and at the end of each period to assess secondary outcomes of the study, including effects of walnut consumption on fecal microbiota and bile acids and metabolic markers of health.
Results: Compared with after the control period, walnut consumption resulted in a 49-160% higher relative abundance of Faecalibacterium, Clostridium, Dialister, and Roseburia and 16-38% lower relative abundances of Ruminococcus, Dorea, Oscillospira, and Bifidobacterium (P < 0.05). Fecal secondary bile acids, deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid, were 25% and 45% lower, respectively, after the walnut treatment compared with the control treatment (P < 0.05). Serum LDL cholesterol and the noncholesterol sterol campesterol concentrations were 7% and 6% lower, respectively, after walnut consumption compared with after the control treatment (P < 0.01).
Conclusion: Walnut consumption affected the composition and function of the human gastrointestinal microbiota, increasing the relative abundances of Firmicutes species in butyrate-producing Clostridium clusters XIVa and IV, including Faecalibacterium and Roseburia, and reducing microbially derived, proinflammatory secondary bile acids and LDL cholesterol. These results suggest that the gastrointestinal microbiota may contribute to the underlying mechanisms of the beneficial health effects of walnut consumption. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01832909.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29726951      PMCID: PMC5991202          DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxy004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


Introduction

The human gastrointestinal tract represents one of the most densely populated microbial communities on earth, containing as many microbial cells as there are human cells in the body and >150 times more bacterial genes than the human genome (1, 2). Among healthy adults, the large intestine contains the densest community of microorganisms, containing upward of 1011 microbial cells/g of colonic contents. Beneficial contributions of these microbes include salvaging energy by metabolizing nondigestable dietary fibers to produce butyrate, a preferential metabolite for colonocytes. However, the gastrointestinal microbiota can also contribute to deleterious effects, such as gastrointestinal and systemic inflammation and the development of noncommunicable diseases, including obesity, cardiovascular disease, and cancer (2–4). Epidemiologic data suggest that a Western diet pattern, rich in saturated fat and simple sugars and devoid of an appreciable amount of dietary fiber, is associated with increased risk of obesity, cardiovascular disease, and colorectal and liver cancer (5, 6). Alternatively, diets rich in nuts, a source of dietary fiber and unsaturated fatty acids, are associated with a reduced risk of total and cause-specific mortality from cancer and heart disease (7). Habitual dietary patterns contribute to the composition and function of the human gastrointestinal microbiome (8). Importantly, short-term changes in diet can alter the microbiome: switching from a vegetarian diet to a diet high in saturated fat and processed meats rapidly (within 2–4 d) changed fecal microbial profiles, reduced fecal butyrate concentrations, and increased bile acid secretion in healthy adults (8, 9). Although the consumption of dietary fiber and prebiotics have been shown to differentially affect the human gastrointestinal microbiome (10–12), there is a dearth of knowledge on the impact of specific whole foods on the human microbiota. Previously, a complete feeding trial that used a randomized controlled crossover design was completed to determine the metabolizable energy of walnuts when consumed as part of a typical American diet (13). The metabolizable energy of walnuts was 21% lower than that predicted by the Atwater values because of reduced digestibility of macronutrients. Because the nutrients that escape digestion in the small intestine enter the large intestine and provide substrates for fermentation by colonic microbiota, our objective was to elucidate the effects of the reduced digestibility of walnuts on the fecal microbiota, fecal bile acids, and metabolic markers of health in healthy adults.

Methods

This study is a follow-up to a previously conducted trial (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01832909). Details of the design and results of the primary study, which assessed the metabolizable energy of walnuts by using bomb calorimetry of diets, walnuts, fecal, and urine samples, were reported elsewhere (13). Herein, secondary outcomes, including fecal microbiota and bile acid concentrations, and metabolic health variables are reported. Briefly, a randomized, crossover, controlled-feeding study with two 3-wk dietary interventions was conducted at the Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center. The fully controlled dietary feeding intervention provided the same base diet during each treatment condition; the base diet was unsupplemented during the control condition and supplemented with 1.5 servings (42 g) of walnut halves and pieces daily during the walnut treatment condition. This amount is consistent with the FDA qualified health claim for walnut consumption on coronary artery disease. The base diet provided 17% of energy from protein, 29% of energy from fat, and 54% of energy from carbohydrates. The base diet foods were reduced in equal proportions during the walnut treatment condition to achieve isocaloric food intake during the 2 diet periods. Diets were scaled according to the energy requirements of the study participants for weight maintenance throughout the study. Participants completed both of the dietary intervention conditions with a 1-wk compliance break between each condition. The treatment order was randomized by dividing participants by sex and by using a random-number generator. Participants completed daily questionnaires for dietary deviations, medications, unusual exercise, and general well-being.

Participants

Study participants were recruited from the Washington, DC area. Interested volunteers completed a health history questionnaire; were measured for height, weight, and blood pressure; and provided fasting blood and urine samples for the analysis of lipids, glucose, a comprehensive metabolic panel, and complete blood count and urinalysis. Potential volunteers were excluded for any of the following reasons: <25 or >75 y of age, BMI (kg/m2) of <20 or >38, fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL, blood pressure ≥160/100 mm Hg, fasting total serum blood cholesterol ≥280 mg/dL, and fasting serum TGs ≥300 mg/dL; if they were smokers or allergic to walnuts; if they abused alcohol; if they had kidney disease, liver disease, gout, hyperthyroidism, untreated or unstable hypothyroidism, certain cancers, gastrointestinal disease, pancreatic disease, diabetes requiring medication, unstable body weight over the past 12 mo, malabsorption syndrome; or if they were women who were pregnant, lactating, or had given birth in the past 12 mo. All of the study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Medstar Research Institute and were in accord with the Declaration of Helsinki. All of the participants provided written consent forms.

Sample collection and analyses

Blood samples were collected at the beginning and end of each treatment condition after a 12-h overnight fast. Serum samples were assayed to assess total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, TGs, and glucose by using enzymatic procedures (Vitros 5,1; Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.); and inflammatory markers (IL-6, C-reactive protein [CRP], serum amyloid A [SAA], soluble adhesion molecules [soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM) and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule (sVCAM)]) were measured by using sandwich-type immunoassay methods (Meso Scientific Discovery). Plasma noncholesterol sterol (squalene, desmosterol, lathosterol, cholestenol, campesterol, and β-sitosterol) concentrations were quantified by GC and expressed relative to total cholesterol (14, 15). Fecal samples were collected at the beginning and end of each dietary period. Upon collection, samples were homogenized in a bag, placed in aliquots, and stored at –80°C at the Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center before overnight shipping on dry ice to the University of Illinois. Fecal DNA was isolated with the use of a PowerLyzer PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Bacterial (16S V4 region, 505f/806r) (16), archaeal (349f/806r), and fungal (ITS1–ITS4) (17) genes were amplified on a Fluidigm Access Array then sequenced on a MiSeq with the use of v3 reagents (Illumina, Inc.) in the WM Keck Center for Biotechnology, University of Illinois, as previously described (18). Sequence data were analyzed with QIIME 1.8.0; sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with the use of closed reference OTU picking against the 13-8 Greengenes database (97% similarity) for the bacterial and archaeal sequences (19). Fungal OTUs were generated with the use of the open reference OTU-picking algorithm against the UNITE OTUs ITS 12_11 reference database. Additional quality filtering (20) was undertaken before rarefying the bacterial sequences to an even sampling depth of 35,957 sequences/sample to assess α and β diversity measures as well as the impact of treatment on OTU relative abundances. Predicted bacterial functional capacity was assessed with the use of PICRUSt, version 1.1.1, and the KEGG Pathway Database (21). Freeze-dried fecal aliquots were shipped overnight to the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University for analysis of bile acids. Briefly, total lipids were extracted overnight by using a modified Folch method (22) with nor-deoxycholic acid (0.4 μg/μL; Steraloids) as the internal standard. Samples were analyzed on an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry UHPLC-QTOF MS (Agilent Technologies) equipped with a 1290 series LC system and a 6550 iFunnel QTOF MS detector. Samples were injected onto the column (Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18; 2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 μm) maintained at 25°C, and the bile acids eluted with the use of a 40-min isocratic mobile phase at 0.25 mL/min, from 10 mM ammonium acetate and 0.1% ammonium hydroxide in 100% methanol (pH = 7.5). The primary (cholic and chenodeoxycholic acids) and secondary (lithocholic and deoxycholic acids) bile acids were identified on the basis of molecular formula, retention times, and mass (MassHunter Qualitative Analysis software) and quantified (micrograms per milligram) with the use of the respective standard curves. Interassay CVs were 1.9% for cholic acid, 5.4% for chenodeoxycholic acid, 2.4% for deoxycholic acid and 4.5% for lithocholic acid.

Statistical analysis

Differences in serum (lipids, glucose, inflammatory markers, and sterols) and fecal (microbial abundances and bile acids) measures at the end of each dietary treatment period were analyzed with the use of a mixed-effects ANOVA with treatment as the fixed effect and participant and period as the random effects. Statistical analysis was conducted in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc.). The UNIVARIATE procedure and Shapiro-Wilk statistic were used to test for data normality, and logarithmic transformations were utilized as needed. Changes from baseline scores were calculated in the walnut group to assess relations between change in bacterial abundances and change in serum cholesterol concentrations. Bivariate correlations were conducted to assess the relations between bacterial abundances and secondary bile acid concentrations at the end of the walnut consumption period. Pearson's correlations were used for normally distributed variables and Spearman correlation for nonnormally distributed variables. Wilcoxon’s rank-sum tests were conducted to compare predicted bacterial butanoate metabolism (KEGG 00650) and secondary bile acid biosynthesis (KEGG 00121) gene counts at the end of the walnut and control periods. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSE; Galaxy version 1.0) was used to assess KEGG Pathway Hierarchy Level 2 and 3 metabolism data. For all of the analyses, P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant and P ≤ 0.10 was considered to be a trend.

Results

All 18 participants, 10 men and 8 women, who were randomly assigned completed the study (). Participants had a mean ± SEM BMI of 28.8 ± 0.9 and were aged 53.1 ± 2.2 y ().
TABLE 1

Baseline characteristics of the 10 men and 8 women who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk[1]

CharacteristicsMean ± SEMRange
Age, y53.1 ± 2.235.0–67.8
BMI, kg/m228.8 ± 0.920.2–34.9
Serum LDL cholesterol, mg/dL121 ± 6.465.5–175
Serum HDL cholesterol, mg/dL51.4 ± 2.929.1–77.9
Serum TGs, mg/dL116 ± 12.739.2–203
Serum glucose, mg/dL92.7 ± 1.789.4–116
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg117 ± 3.498–144
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg71.4 ± 2.260–90

1Serum analytes were assessed after an overnight fast. Adapted with permission from reference 13.

Baseline characteristics of the 10 men and 8 women who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk[1] 1Serum analytes were assessed after an overnight fast. Adapted with permission from reference 13. The mean ± SD bacterial OTU was 88,880 ± 47,427, with a maximum of 288,079 counts and a minimum of 35,957 counts/sample. At the phylum level, the majority of sequences were dominated by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria (84.4%, 6.5%, and 5.4%, respectively). Thirty-five families were identified. Six families (Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, an undefined family in the Clostridales order, Bacteroidaceae, Bifodobacteriaceae, and Verrucomicrobiaceae) comprised >90% of all families. Seventy-two genera were classified, with 22 representing >96% of sequences and 15 representing <1%; Bacteroides, Blautia, Coprococcus, Ruminococcus, unclassified Ruminococcaceae, unclassified Clostridiales, and unclassified Lachnospiraceae represented 74% of sequences. The mean ± SD archaeal OTU was 19,205 ± 42,075, with a maximum of 163,351 counts and a minimum of 3 counts/sample. Treatment did not affect archaea abundances. Fungal OTUs were present in lower abundances with a mean ± SD of 854 ± 2765 counts/sample. The minimum was 1 OTU (13 samples) and the maximum was 17,404 sequences. Treatment did not affect fungal abundances. Walnut consumption did not affect bacterial α diversity measures, including phylogenetic diversity, observed OTUs, or richness and evenness. For β diversity, weighted principal coordinates analysis of UniFrac distances between samples based on their 97% OTU composition and abundances showed that bacterial communities were affected by walnut consumption (P = 0.03). At the phylum level, compared with the end of the control period, walnut consumption increased (P = 0.04) the relative abundance of Firmicutes and decreased (P = 0.02) the relative abundance of Actinobacteria (). Among bacterial genera, Faecalibacterium, Clostridium, Roseburia, and Dialister were increased (P < 0.05) at the end of the walnut intervention period compared with the control ( Table 2). Alternatively, the relative abundances of Ruminococcus, Dorea, Oscillospira, and Bifidobacterium were lower (P < 0.05) at the end of the control diet period than at the end of the walnut diet period (Table 2). The number of predicted bacterial butanoate metabolism genes was not different at the end of the walnut period (488,366 ± 168,601) compared with after the control period (570,743 ± 151,243) (P = 0.11).
TABLE 2

Fecal bacterial phyla and genera of adults who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk, in a crossover design[1]

Percentage of sequences
Phyla and generaControlWalnutSEM P
Firmicutes82.487.22.830.04
Blautia8.338.230.820.82
Coprococcus7.566.990.740.25
Ruminococcus6.195.170.85<0.01
Dorea3.212.580.39<0.01
Streptococcus2.071.981.030.80
Faecalibacterium1.452.770.590.02
Roseburia0.791.320.29<0.01
Clostridium0.721.070.130.01
Oscillospira[2]0.510.370.060.04
Dialister0.280.730.250.04
Lactobacillus0.280.460.360.34
Lachnospira0.230.260.060.63
Anaerostipes0.220.260.050.30
Bacteroidetes5.725.202.100.62
Bacteroides4.884.601.810.77
Parabacteroides0.130.160.070.48
Actinobacteria8.195.001.900.02
Bifidobacterium6.433.971.830.03
Collinsella[2]0.100.050.260.07
Verrucomicrobia3.26 1.770.960.41
Akkermansia3.261.770.960.41
Proteobacteria0.230.580.130.13
Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes[3]1.641.730.210.54

1Values are least-square means ± SEMs unless otherwise indicated; n = 18. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of a mixed-model ANOVA.

2Values are mean log-normalized sequence abundances ± SEs.

3Values are least-square means ± SEMs of log-transformed Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio.

Fecal bacterial phyla and genera of adults who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk, in a crossover design[1] 1Values are least-square means ± SEMs unless otherwise indicated; n = 18. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of a mixed-model ANOVA. 2Values are mean log-normalized sequence abundances ± SEs. 3Values are least-square means ± SEMs of log-transformed Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio. Primary bile acids were not affected by treatment. Microbially derived secondary bile acids, deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid, were reduced by 25% and 45%, respectively, in the walnut group compared with the control (P < 0.01) (). The number of predicted bacterial biosynthesis of secondary bile acids genes tended (P = 0.09) to be lower at the end of the walnut period (36,331 ± 12,256) than at the end of the control period (42,714 ± 11,605).
TABLE 3

Fecal bile acid concentration of freeze-dried feces collected from adults who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk[1]

ControlWalnutSEM P
Cholic acid, µg/mg0.320.280.090.54
Chenodeoxycholic acid, µg/mg0.200.150.050.19
Deoxycholic acid, µg/mg2.611.960.23<0.01
Lithocholic acid, µg/mg0.760.410.06<0.01

1Values are least-square means ± pooled SEMs; n = 18 participants in a crossover design. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of a mixed-model ANOVA.

Fecal bile acid concentration of freeze-dried feces collected from adults who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk[1] 1Values are least-square means ± pooled SEMs; n = 18 participants in a crossover design. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of a mixed-model ANOVA. Serum total cholesterol concentrations were lower (P = 0.03) by 7 mg/dL (4% reduction) and LDL-cholesterol concentrations were lower (P < 0.01) by 9 mg/dL (7% reduction) after walnut consumption compared with the control (). Other metabolic variables were unaffected by walnut consumption. Serum campesterol was lower (P = 0.01) by 10 μmol/mmol (6% reduction), and lathosterol concentrations tended to be lower (P = 0.06) during the walnut period compared with the control (). There were no associations between the change in total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol and microbes affected by walnut consumption (). Lithocholic acid concentrations were positively associated with the relative abundances of Dorea (r = 0.46, P = 0.05) () at the end of the walnut treatment period and tended to be negatively associated with Roseburia (r = −0.42, P = 0.08) (Figure 1B). There were no associations between deoxycholic acid concentrations and bacteria affected by walnut consumption (). Other predicted bacterial metabolism gene counts were unaffected by walnut consumption ().
TABLE 4

Serum analytes of adults who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk[1]

ControlWalnutSEM P
Cholesterol, mg/dL1941877.10.03
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL1171086.5<0.01
HDL cholesterol, mg/dL48.048.53.00.51
TGs, mg/dL92.489.88.20.35
Glucose, mg/dL99.799.51.60.79
IL-6, pg/mL1.431.360.180.32
CRP, ng/mL3330383012900.37
SAA, ng/mL5490610427900.52
sICAM, ng/mL33633416.40.68
sVCAM, ng/mL50350232.60.86

1Values are least-square means ± pooled SEMs; n = 18 participants in a crossover design. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of a mixed-model ANOVA. CRP, C-reactive protein; SAA, serum amyloid A; sICAM, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule; sVCAM, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule.

TABLE 5

Serum noncholesterol sterol concentration of adults who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk[1]

ControlWalnutSEM P
Squalene, 100 μmol/mmol cholesterol15.914.01.870.25
Desmosterol, 100 μmol/mmol cholesterol10597.98.490.29
Lathosterol, 100 μmol/mmol cholesterol18316926.80.06
Cholestanol, 100 μmol/mmol cholesterol33134217.10.47
Campesterol, 100 μmol/mmol cholesterol16915919.80.01
β-Sitosterol, 100 μmol/mmol cholesterol75.477.910.70.14

1Values are least-square means ± pooled SEMs; n = 18 participants in a crossover design. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of a mixed-model ANOVA.

TABLE 6

Associations between fecal microbiota and serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in the walnut treatment group[1]

Cholesterol, mg/dLLDL cholesterol, mg/dL
Genera, % of sequences ρ P ρ P
Ruminococcus −0.390.10−0.330.19
Dorea −0.030.89−0.130.62
Faecalibacterium 0.260.300.310.21
Roseburia 0.140.580.100.70
Clostridium 0.200.43−0.020.94
Oscillospira −0.210.41−0.390.11
Dialister −0.200.42−0.160.52
Bifidobacterium 0.170.490.030.92

1Relations between change from baseline fecal bacterial sequence abundances that were significantly affected by walnut consumption and serum total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol concentrations were assessed in the walnut treatment group (n = 18) with the use of bivariate correlations (Spearman's ρ).

FIGURE 1

Bivariate correlations between fecal Dorea (A) and Roseburia (B) sequence abundances and lithocholic acid concentrations at the end of the walnut treatment period.

TABLE 7

Bivariate correlations between fecal bacterial sequence abundances and secondary bile acid concentrations at the end of the walnut consumption period among the 18 adult participants

Deoxycholic acid, µg/mgLithocholic acid, µg/mg
Genera, % of sequences r P r P
Ruminococcus 0.070.770.080.77
Dorea 0.250.320.460.05
Faecalibacterium −0.270.28−0.250.33
Roseburia −0.320.19−0.420.08
Clostridium −0.290.25−0.210.41
Oscillospira −0.150.550.070.78
Dialister −0.240.34−0.170.49
Bifidobacterium −0.130.62−0.120.63
Bivariate correlations between fecal Dorea (A) and Roseburia (B) sequence abundances and lithocholic acid concentrations at the end of the walnut treatment period. Serum analytes of adults who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk[1] 1Values are least-square means ± pooled SEMs; n = 18 participants in a crossover design. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of a mixed-model ANOVA. CRP, C-reactive protein; SAA, serum amyloid A; sICAM, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule; sVCAM, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule. Serum noncholesterol sterol concentration of adults who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk[1] 1Values are least-square means ± pooled SEMs; n = 18 participants in a crossover design. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of a mixed-model ANOVA. Associations between fecal microbiota and serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in the walnut treatment group[1] 1Relations between change from baseline fecal bacterial sequence abundances that were significantly affected by walnut consumption and serum total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol concentrations were assessed in the walnut treatment group (n = 18) with the use of bivariate correlations (Spearman's ρ). Bivariate correlations between fecal bacterial sequence abundances and secondary bile acid concentrations at the end of the walnut consumption period among the 18 adult participants

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the impact of walnut consumption on the human fecal microbiota and bacterial metabolites and metabolic health. Specifically, in a completely controlled dietary intervention, the addition of 42 g walnut halves/d increased the relative abundance of Firmicutes species in the Clostridium clusters XIVa and IV, including Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, and Clostridium. These results are supported by preclinical studies indicating that walnuts increased the relative abundances of Firmicutes, including the genera Clostridium (23) and Roseburia (24). In vitro work has shown that Faecalibacterium and Roseburia spp. display butyryl CoA:acetate CoA transferase activity and ferment fiber to produce butyrate (25–27). Although in vitro fermentation of walnuts has not been investigated to our knowledge, finely ground almonds have been shown to increase butyrate concentrations in vitro (28). However, because our results also showed a reduction in the relative abundance of Bifidobacteria, a microbe that produces acetate, a necessary metabolite for butyrate production through butyryl CoA:acetate CoA transferase enzyme activity, walnut consumption may not have resulted in an overall increase in butyrate concentrations. Furthermore, our results showed that there was not a significant difference in predicted bacterial butyrate metabolism gene abundances between the walnut and control groups. Additional in vitro and in vivo research is necessary to determine if walnuts increase microbial butyrate production and gastrointestinal butyrate concentration, respectively. The human liver synthesizes 2 primary bile acids, cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid, which are converted to secondary bile acidsdeoxycholic and lithocholic acid, respectively—by intestinal bacteria (29). Western diets, which are rich in saturated fat and low in dietary fiber, result in increased amounts of secondary bile acids in the colon and biliary pool (30), and evidence suggests that deoxycholic and lithocholic acids are toxic bile acids associated with gastrointestinal diseases and colon cancer (31, 32). The gastrointestinal microbiota has been shown to regulate the metabolism and synthesis of bile acids via the nuclear bile acid receptor farnesoid X receptor (33). Dietary fatty acid composition has also been shown to differentially affect the interactions between bile acids and the gastrointestinal microbiota (34). Herein, we report significant reductions in microbially derived, proinflammatory secondary bile acids (e.g., deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid) after walnut consumption, and a trend for a reduction in predicted bacterial secondary bile acid biosynthesis gene abundances in the walnut group compared with the control group (P = 0.09). Both reduced secondary bile acid concentrations and increased Faecalibacterium have been shown to reduce gut inflammation (31, 35). Furthermore, a rodent study showed that walnut consumption reduces colon tumor development and size and led to changes in the cecal microbiota (36). Thus, the findings in this report provide additional support for the connections between diet, the gastrointestinal microbiota, and colonic health. Related to the effects on walnut consumption on cardiovascular health, similar to previous reports our results show that walnut consumption reduced total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations (37). Although walnut consumption reduced total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations and changed the composition of the fecal microbiota, there were no significant relations between microbes affected by walnut consumption and total and LDL cholesterol. These results suggest that total and LDL cholesterol are not directly related to gastrointestinal microbes, which is consistent with a cross-sectional study in 893 subjects that reported that neither LDL cholesterol nor total cholesterol were related to the microbiota (5, 6). Interestingly, Dorea and Roseburia tended to be related to the concentration of the secondary bile acid lithocholic acid, suggesting that the associations between the gastrointestinal microbiota and cardiovascular health may be related to the microbial metabolism of bile acids and subsequent signally through farnesoid X receptor. PUFAs have antimicrobial properties, including the inhibition of bacterial FA synthesis (38), growth, and mucus adhesion (39). n–3 FA supplementation modulated rodent fecal microbiota by suppressing growth of bacteria associated with obesity and inflammation (40). PUFAs can also modulate the gastrointestinal microbiota due to differing abilities of bacteria to metabolize long-chain FAs. For example, in vitro studies have shown that Roseburia spp. are involved in the process of converting linoleic acid to its conjugated form (41–43). Thus, the increase in Roseburia in the present study may be related to its ability to metabolize FAs. In addition to providing a source of fiber and unsaturated FAs, walnuts are also high in ellagic acid. Gastrointestinal bacteria can metabolize ellagic acid to produce urolithins, which can enter the enterohepatic circulation and have anti-inflammatory and beneficial vascular effects (44–46). Walnut extract, including polyphenols and ellagic acid, has shown positive effects on endothelial health in vitro (47). To our knowledge, studies have only investigated the effects of walnut, tree nut, and polyphenol consumption on either the presence of urolithin byproducts through urinalysis or the microbiome through analysis of fecal samples (48, 49), whereas little is known about the roles of specific bacteria on polyphenol metabolism and urolithin production. Fermentation of pomegranate tannins including ellagic acid in vitro resulted in increased microbial fermentation, thereby reducing pH (50). Others have shown that Bifidobacterium fragilis is inhibited by the presence of ellagic acid (50), which could explain the decrease in the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. after the walnut diet condition in the present study. Although the age range for this study population was fairly broad (35–68 y), 13 of the 18 participants were aged ≥50 y. Thus, the characteristics of the microbiota would generally be reflective of a slightly older population. Because Faecalibacterium and Roseburia have been reported to be negatively associated with age and Oscillospira to be positively associated with age (51, 52), the consumption of walnuts may help to slow age-related changes in the microbiota. However, because semi-supercentenarians show enriched Bifidobacterium (52), and walnut consumption reduced the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium, additional research is necessary to assess the effects of walnut consumption and the microbiota in the context of aging. The strength of this study is the use of a complete feeding, randomized, controlled crossover trial with a washout period to assess the impact of walnut consumption on physiologic and microbiological outcomes among human subjects. Study limitations include the lack of fecal fermentative end products, including short-chain FAs, and metagenomic analyses to assess the functional capacity of the microbiota. In summary, walnut consumption affected the gastrointestinal microbiota and microbially derived secondary bile acids and reduced serum total and LDL cholesterol in healthy adults. These results suggest that the gastrointestinal microbiota may contribute to the underlying mechanisms of the beneficial health effects of walnut consumption, including cardiometabolic and gastrointestinal health. Click here for additional data file.
  50 in total

1.  Colonic mucosal proliferation is related to serum deoxycholic acid levels.

Authors:  T Ochsenkühn; E Bayerdörffer; A Meining; M Schinkel; C Thiede; V Nüssler; M Sackmann; R Hatz; A Neubauer; G Paumgartner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Comparability and quality of data.

Authors:  D M Parkin; C S Muir
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1992

3.  Gut Microbiota Community and Its Assembly Associated with Age and Diet in Chinese Centenarians.

Authors:  Fang Wang; Ting Yu; Guohong Huang; Da Cai; Xiaolin Liang; Haiyan Su; Zhenjun Zhu; Danlei Li; Yang Yang; Peihong Shen; Ruifeng Mao; Lian Yu; Mouming Zhao; Quanyang Li
Journal:  J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.351

Review 4.  The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Petra Louis; Georgina L Hold; Harry J Flint
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  The influence of polyunsaturated fatty acids on probiotic growth and adhesion.

Authors:  P E Kankaanpää; S J Salminen; E Isolauri; Y K Lee
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Junjie Qin; Yingrui Li; Zhiming Cai; Shenghui Li; Jianfeng Zhu; Fan Zhang; Suisha Liang; Wenwei Zhang; Yuanlin Guan; Dongqian Shen; Yangqing Peng; Dongya Zhang; Zhuye Jie; Wenxian Wu; Youwen Qin; Wenbin Xue; Junhua Li; Lingchuan Han; Donghui Lu; Peixian Wu; Yali Dai; Xiaojuan Sun; Zesong Li; Aifa Tang; Shilong Zhong; Xiaoping Li; Weineng Chen; Ran Xu; Mingbang Wang; Qiang Feng; Meihua Gong; Jing Yu; Yanyan Zhang; Ming Zhang; Torben Hansen; Gaston Sanchez; Jeroen Raes; Gwen Falony; Shujiro Okuda; Mathieu Almeida; Emmanuelle LeChatelier; Pierre Renault; Nicolas Pons; Jean-Michel Batto; Zhaoxi Zhang; Hua Chen; Ruifu Yang; Weimou Zheng; Songgang Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; S Dusko Ehrlich; Rasmus Nielsen; Oluf Pedersen; Karsten Kristiansen; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Potential prebiotic properties of almond (Amygdalus communis L.) seeds.

Authors:  G Mandalari; C Nueno-Palop; G Bisignano; M S J Wickham; A Narbad
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Impact of simvastatin, niacin, and/or antioxidants on cholesterol metabolism in CAD patients with low HDL.

Authors:  Nirupa R Matthan; Ann Giovanni; Ernst J Schaefer; B Greg Brown; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 5.922

9.  Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes.

Authors:  Gary D Wu; Jun Chen; Christian Hoffmann; Kyle Bittinger; Ying-Yu Chen; Sue A Keilbaugh; Meenakshi Bewtra; Dan Knights; William A Walters; Rob Knight; Rohini Sinha; Erin Gilroy; Kernika Gupta; Robert Baldassano; Lisa Nessel; Hongzhe Li; Frederic D Bushman; James D Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Hannah D Holscher
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2017-02-06
View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Nuts and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.

Authors:  A M Coates; A M Hill; S Y Tan
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Broccoli consumption affects the human gastrointestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kaczmarek; Xiaoji Liu; Craig S Charron; Janet A Novotny; Elizabeth H Jeffery; Harold E Seifried; Sharon A Ross; Michael J Miller; Kelly S Swanson; Hannah D Holscher
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Plant Foods, Antioxidant Biomarkers, and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and Mortality: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Dagfinn Aune
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 4.  Intestinal Flora: A Potential New Regulator of Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Yifei Zou; Xianjing Song; Ning Liu; Wei Sun; Bin Liu
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 9.968

Review 5.  Microbiome-Mediated Effects of the Mediterranean Diet on Inflammation.

Authors:  Melisa A Bailey; Hannah D Holscher
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

6.  An Overview of Current Knowledge of the Gut Microbiota and Low-Calorie Sweeteners.

Authors:  Riley L Hughes; Cindy D Davis; Alexandra Lobach; Hannah D Holscher
Journal:  Nutr Today       Date:  2021 May-Jun

Review 7.  Diet and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: Sowing the Seeds of Good Mental Health.

Authors:  Kirsten Berding; Klara Vlckova; Wolfgang Marx; Harriet Schellekens; Catherine Stanton; Gerard Clarke; Felice Jacka; Timothy G Dinan; John F Cryan
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 8.  Leveraging diet to engineer the gut microbiome.

Authors:  Mathis Wolter; Erica T Grant; Marie Boudaud; Alex Steimle; Gabriel V Pereira; Eric C Martens; Mahesh S Desai
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  Association of dietary patterns with the gut microbiota in older, community-dwelling men.

Authors:  James M Shikany; Ryan T Demmer; Abigail J Johnson; Nora F Fino; Katie Meyer; Kristine E Ensrud; Nancy E Lane; Eric S Orwoll; Deborah M Kado; Joseph M Zmuda; Lisa Langsetmo
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Walnut intake, cognitive outcomes and risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Danielle Cahoon; Shruti P Shertukde; Esther E Avendano; Jirayu Tanprasertsuk; Tammy M Scott; Elizabeth J Johnson; Mei Chung; Nanguneri Nirmala
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.