| Literature DB >> 29726951 |
Hannah D Holscher1,2, Heather M Guetterman1, Kelly S Swanson2,3, Ruopeng An2, Nirupa R Matthan4, Alice H Lichtenstein4, Janet A Novotny5, David J Baer5.
Abstract
Background: Epidemiologic data suggest that diets rich in nuts have beneficial health effects, including reducing total and cause-specific mortality from cancer and heart disease. Although there is accumulating preclinical evidence that walnuts beneficially affect the gastrointestinal microbiota and gut and metabolic health, these relations have not been investigated in humans. Objective: We aimed to assess the impact of walnut consumption on the human gastrointestinal microbiota and metabolic markers of health.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29726951 PMCID: PMC5991202 DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxy004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr ISSN: 0022-3166 Impact factor: 4.798
Baseline characteristics of the 10 men and 8 women who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk[1]
| Characteristics | Mean ± SEM | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 53.1 ± 2.2 | 35.0–67.8 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 28.8 ± 0.9 | 20.2–34.9 |
| Serum LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 121 ± 6.4 | 65.5–175 |
| Serum HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 51.4 ± 2.9 | 29.1–77.9 |
| Serum TGs, mg/dL | 116 ± 12.7 | 39.2–203 |
| Serum glucose, mg/dL | 92.7 ± 1.7 | 89.4–116 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 117 ± 3.4 | 98–144 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 71.4 ± 2.2 | 60–90 |
1Serum analytes were assessed after an overnight fast. Adapted with permission from reference 13.
Fecal bacterial phyla and genera of adults who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk, in a crossover design[1]
| Percentage of sequences | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phyla and genera | Control | Walnut | SEM |
|
| Firmicutes | 82.4 | 87.2 | 2.83 | 0.04 |
| | 8.33 | 8.23 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| | 7.56 | 6.99 | 0.74 | 0.25 |
| | 6.19 | 5.17 | 0.85 | <0.01 |
| | 3.21 | 2.58 | 0.39 | <0.01 |
| | 2.07 | 1.98 | 1.03 | 0.80 |
| | 1.45 | 2.77 | 0.59 | 0.02 |
| | 0.79 | 1.32 | 0.29 | <0.01 |
| | 0.72 | 1.07 | 0.13 | 0.01 |
| | 0.51 | 0.37 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| | 0.28 | 0.73 | 0.25 | 0.04 |
| | 0.28 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.34 |
| | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 0.63 |
| | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.05 | 0.30 |
| Bacteroidetes | 5.72 | 5.20 | 2.10 | 0.62 |
| | 4.88 | 4.60 | 1.81 | 0.77 |
| | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.48 |
| Actinobacteria | 8.19 | 5.00 | 1.90 | 0.02 |
| | 6.43 | 3.97 | 1.83 | 0.03 |
| | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.26 | 0.07 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 3.26 | 1.77 | 0.96 | 0.41 |
| | 3.26 | 1.77 | 0.96 | 0.41 |
| Proteobacteria | 0.23 | 0.58 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes[ | 1.64 | 1.73 | 0.21 | 0.54 |
1Values are least-square means ± SEMs unless otherwise indicated; n = 18. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of a mixed-model ANOVA.
2Values are mean log-normalized sequence abundances ± SEs.
3Values are least-square means ± SEMs of log-transformed Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio.
Fecal bile acid concentration of freeze-dried feces collected from adults who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk[1]
| Control | Walnut | SEM |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cholic acid, µg/mg | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.09 | 0.54 |
| Chenodeoxycholic acid, µg/mg | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.19 |
| Deoxycholic acid, µg/mg | 2.61 | 1.96 | 0.23 | <0.01 |
| Lithocholic acid, µg/mg | 0.76 | 0.41 | 0.06 | <0.01 |
1Values are least-square means ± pooled SEMs; n = 18 participants in a crossover design. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of a mixed-model ANOVA.
Serum analytes of adults who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk[1]
| Control | Walnut | SEM |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol, mg/dL | 194 | 187 | 7.1 | 0.03 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 117 | 108 | 6.5 | <0.01 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 48.0 | 48.5 | 3.0 | 0.51 |
| TGs, mg/dL | 92.4 | 89.8 | 8.2 | 0.35 |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 99.7 | 99.5 | 1.6 | 0.79 |
| IL-6, pg/mL | 1.43 | 1.36 | 0.18 | 0.32 |
| CRP, ng/mL | 3330 | 3830 | 1290 | 0.37 |
| SAA, ng/mL | 5490 | 6104 | 2790 | 0.52 |
| sICAM, ng/mL | 336 | 334 | 16.4 | 0.68 |
| sVCAM, ng/mL | 503 | 502 | 32.6 | 0.86 |
1Values are least-square means ± pooled SEMs; n = 18 participants in a crossover design. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of a mixed-model ANOVA. CRP, C-reactive protein; SAA, serum amyloid A; sICAM, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule; sVCAM, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule.
Serum noncholesterol sterol concentration of adults who consumed control and walnut diets, each for 3 wk[1]
| Control | Walnut | SEM |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Squalene, 100 μmol/mmol cholesterol | 15.9 | 14.0 | 1.87 | 0.25 |
| Desmosterol, 100 μmol/mmol cholesterol | 105 | 97.9 | 8.49 | 0.29 |
| Lathosterol, 100 μmol/mmol cholesterol | 183 | 169 | 26.8 | 0.06 |
| Cholestanol, 100 μmol/mmol cholesterol | 331 | 342 | 17.1 | 0.47 |
| Campesterol, 100 μmol/mmol cholesterol | 169 | 159 | 19.8 | 0.01 |
| β-Sitosterol, 100 μmol/mmol cholesterol | 75.4 | 77.9 | 10.7 | 0.14 |
1Values are least-square means ± pooled SEMs; n = 18 participants in a crossover design. Treatment effects were evaluated with the use of a mixed-model ANOVA.
Associations between fecal microbiota and serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in the walnut treatment group[1]
| Cholesterol, mg/dL | LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genera, % of sequences |
|
|
|
|
|
| −0.39 | 0.10 | −0.33 | 0.19 |
|
| −0.03 | 0.89 | −0.13 | 0.62 |
|
| 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.21 |
|
| 0.14 | 0.58 | 0.10 | 0.70 |
|
| 0.20 | 0.43 | −0.02 | 0.94 |
|
| −0.21 | 0.41 | −0.39 | 0.11 |
|
| −0.20 | 0.42 | −0.16 | 0.52 |
|
| 0.17 | 0.49 | 0.03 | 0.92 |
1Relations between change from baseline fecal bacterial sequence abundances that were significantly affected by walnut consumption and serum total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol concentrations were assessed in the walnut treatment group (n = 18) with the use of bivariate correlations (Spearman's ρ).
FIGURE 1Bivariate correlations between fecal Dorea (A) and Roseburia (B) sequence abundances and lithocholic acid concentrations at the end of the walnut treatment period.
Bivariate correlations between fecal bacterial sequence abundances and secondary bile acid concentrations at the end of the walnut consumption period among the 18 adult participants
| Deoxycholic acid, µg/mg | Lithocholic acid, µg/mg | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genera, % of sequences |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.07 | 0.77 | 0.08 | 0.77 |
|
| 0.25 | 0.32 | 0.46 | 0.05 |
|
| −0.27 | 0.28 | −0.25 | 0.33 |
|
| −0.32 | 0.19 | −0.42 | 0.08 |
|
| −0.29 | 0.25 | −0.21 | 0.41 |
|
| −0.15 | 0.55 | 0.07 | 0.78 |
|
| −0.24 | 0.34 | −0.17 | 0.49 |
|
| −0.13 | 0.62 | −0.12 | 0.63 |