Marco Cassone1, Julia Mantey1, Mary Beth Perri2, Kristen Gibson1, Bonnie Lansing1, Sara McNamara1, Payal K Patel3,4, Vincent C C Cheng5,6, Maroya S Walters7, Nimalie D Stone7, Marcus J Zervos2,8, Lona Mody1,9. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor. 2. Henry Ford Health System, Detroit. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Michigan. 5. Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China. 6. Infection Control Team, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China. 7. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 8. Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit. 9. Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Michigan.
Abstract
Background: Most nursing facilities (NFs) lack methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) surveillance programs due to limited resources and high costs. We investigated the utility of environmental screening of high-touch surfaces in patient rooms as a way to circumvent these challenges. Methods: We compared MRSA and VRE culture data from high-touch surfaces in patients' rooms (14450 samples from 6 NFs) and ranked each site's performance in predicting patient colonization (7413 samples). The best-performing sites were included in a MRSA- and a VRE-specific panel that functioned as a proxy for patient colonization. Molecular typing was performed to confirm available concordant patient-environment pairs. Results: We identified and validated a MRSA panel that consisted of the bed controls, nurse call button, bed rail, and TV remote control. The VRE panel included the toilet seat, bed controls, bed rail, TV remote control, and top of the side table. Panel colonization data tracked patient colonization. Negative predictive values were 89%-92% for MRSA and 82%-84% for VRE. Molecular typing confirmed a strong clonal type relationship in available concordant patient-environment pairs (98% for MRSA, 91% for VRE), pointing to common epidemiological patterns for environmental and patient isolates. Conclusions: Environmental panels used as a proxy for patient colonization and incorporated into facility surveillance protocols can guide decolonization strategies, improve awareness of MRSA and VRE burden, and inform efforts to reduce transmission. Targeted environmental screening may be a viable surveillance strategy for MRSA and VRE detection in NFs.
Background: Most nursing facilities (NFs) lack methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) surveillance programs due to limited resources and high costs. We investigated the utility of environmental screening of high-touch surfaces in patient rooms as a way to circumvent these challenges. Methods: We compared MRSA and VRE culture data from high-touch surfaces in patients' rooms (14450 samples from 6 NFs) and ranked each site's performance in predicting patient colonization (7413 samples). The best-performing sites were included in a MRSA- and a VRE-specific panel that functioned as a proxy for patient colonization. Molecular typing was performed to confirm available concordant patient-environment pairs. Results: We identified and validated a MRSA panel that consisted of the bed controls, nurse call button, bed rail, and TV remote control. The VRE panel included the toilet seat, bed controls, bed rail, TV remote control, and top of the side table. Panel colonization data tracked patient colonization. Negative predictive values were 89%-92% for MRSA and 82%-84% for VRE. Molecular typing confirmed a strong clonal type relationship in available concordant patient-environment pairs (98% for MRSA, 91% for VRE), pointing to common epidemiological patterns for environmental and patient isolates. Conclusions: Environmental panels used as a proxy for patient colonization and incorporated into facility surveillance protocols can guide decolonization strategies, improve awareness of MRSA and VRE burden, and inform efforts to reduce transmission. Targeted environmental screening may be a viable surveillance strategy for MRSA and VRE detection in NFs.
Authors: Keiko Okuma; Kozue Iwakawa; John D Turnidge; Warren B Grubb; Jan M Bell; Frances G O'Brien; Geoffrey W Coombs; John W Pearman; Fred C Tenover; Maria Kapi; Chuntima Tiensasitorn; Teruyo Ito; Keiichi Hiramatsu Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: James A McKinnell; Susan S Huang; Samantha J Eells; Eric Cui; Loren G Miller Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: G Lina; Y Piémont; F Godail-Gamot; M Bes; M O Peter; V Gauduchon; F Vandenesch; J Etienne Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: B E Ostrowsky; W E Trick; A H Sohn; S B Quirk; S Holt; L A Carson; B C Hill; M J Arduino; M J Kuehnert; W R Jarvis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-05-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Linda K McDougal; Christine D Steward; George E Killgore; Jasmine M Chaitram; Sigrid K McAllister; Fred C Tenover Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Courtney R Murphy; Victor Quan; Diane Kim; Ellena Peterson; Matthew Whealon; Grace Tan; Kaye Evans; Hildy Meyers; Michele Cheung; Bruce Y Lee; Dana B Mukamel; Susan S Huang Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Kevin Heinze; Mohammed Kabeto; Emily Toth Martin; Marco Cassone; Liam Hicks; Lona Mody Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Lona Mody; Laraine L Washer; Keith S Kaye; Kristen Gibson; Sanjay Saint; Katherine Reyes; Marco Cassone; Julia Mantey; Jie Cao; Sarah Altamimi; Mary Perri; Hugo Sax; Vineet Chopra; Marcus Zervos Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Marco Cassone; Ziwei Zhu; Julia Mantey; Kristen E Gibson; Mary B Perri; Marcus J Zervos; Evan S Snitkin; Betsy Foxman; Lona Mody Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Cinzia Ullrich; Anne M Luescher; Robert N Grass; Hugo Sax; Julian Koch Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 4.887
Authors: Kyle J Gontjes; Kristen E Gibson; Bonnie J Lansing; Julia Mantey; Karen M Jones; Marco Cassone; Joyce Wang; John P Mills; Lona Mody; Payal K Patel Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-02-01
Authors: Lona Mody; Kyle J Gontjes; Marco Cassone; Kristen E Gibson; Bonnie J Lansing; Julia Mantey; Mohammed Kabeto; Andrzej Galecki; Lillian Min Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-07-01
Authors: Marco Cassone; Julia Mantey; Kyle J Gontjes; Bonnie J Lansing; Kristen E Gibson; Joyce Wang; Lona Mody Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-07-12