Literature DB >> 29726849

The LUGPA Alternative Payment Model for Initial Therapy of Newly Diagnosed Patients With Organ-confined Prostate Cancer: Rationale and Development.

Deepak A Kapoor1,2, Neal D Shore3, Gary M Kirsh4, Jonathan Henderson5, Todd D Cohen6, Kathleen Latino1.   

Abstract

Over the past several decades, rapid expansion in healthcare expenditures has exposed the utilization incentives inherent in fee-for-service payment models. The passage of Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 heralded a transition toward value-based care, creating incentives for practitioners to accept bidirectional risk linked to outcome and utilization metrics. At present, the limited availability of these vehicles excludes all but a handful of providers from participation in alternative payment models (APMs). The LUGPA APM supports the goals of the triple aim in improving the patient experience, enhancing population health and reducing expenditures. By requiring utilization of certified electronic health record technologies, tying payment to quality metrics, and requiring practices to bear more than nominal risk, the LUGPA APM qualifies as an advanced APM, thereby easing the reporting burden and creating opportunities for participating practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative payment model; Fee-for-service; Merit-based incentive payment system; Value-based care

Year:  2017        PMID: 29726849      PMCID: PMC5811880          DOI: 10.3909/riu0779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  7 in total

1.  Resource-based relative values. An overview.

Authors:  W C Hsiao; P Braun; D Dunn; E R Becker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-10-28       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Geographic variation in Medicare services.

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Alan M Garber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Psychosocial aspects of active surveillance.

Authors:  Meredith W Kazer; Sarah P Psutka; David M Latini; Donald E Bailey
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.309

4.  The Influence of Psychosocial Constructs on the Adherence to Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer in a Prospective, Population-based Cohort.

Authors:  Maximilian F Lang; Mark D Tyson; JoAnn Rudd Alvarez; Tatsuki Koyama; Karen E Hoffman; Matthew J Resnick; Matthew R Cooperberg; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Vivien Chen; Lisa E Paddock; Ann S Hamilton; Mia Hashibe; Michael Goodman; Sheldon Greenfield; Sherrie H Kaplan; Antoinette Stroup; David F Penson; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Emotional Distress Increases the Likelihood of Undergoing Surgery among Men with Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Willie Underwood; Caitlin Biddle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Slowing the growth of health care costs--lessons from regional variation.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; Julie P Bynum; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Recent decline in prostate cancer incidence in the United States, by age, stage, and Gleason score.

Authors:  Kimberly A Herget; Darshan P Patel; Heidi A Hanson; Carol Sweeney; William T Lowrance
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.452

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Preserving Independent Urology: LUGPA's First Decade.

Authors:  Neal D Shore; Deepak A Kapoor; Evan R Goldfischer; David C Chaikin; Earl L Walz; R Jonathan Henderson; Richard G Harris; Robert D Asinof; Gary M Kirsh
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2019
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.