Literature DB >> 29726671

The Ethics of Bundled Payments in Total Joint Replacement: "Cherry Picking" and "Lemon Dropping."

Casey Jo Humbyrd.   

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has initiated bundled payments for hip and knee total joint replacement in an effort to decrease healthcare costs and increase quality of care. The ethical implications of this program have not been studied. This article considers the ethics of patient selection to improve outcomes; specifically, screening patients by body mass index to determine eligibility for total joint replacement. I argue that this type of screening is not ethically defensible, and that the bundled payment program as structured is likely to lead to unfair restrictions on who receives total joint replacements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29726671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ethics        ISSN: 1046-7890


  4 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: What Are the Uses and Limitations of Time-driven Activity-based Costing in Total Joint Replacement?

Authors:  Uma Srikumaran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CORR Insights®: Higher Volume Surgeons Have Lower Medicare Payments, Readmissions, and Mortality After THA.

Authors:  Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  CORR Insights®: Is There an Association Between Bundled Payments and "Cherry Picking" and "Lemon Dropping" in Orthopaedic Surgery? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yehuda E Kerbel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Outcomes of Total Joint Arthroplasty in Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic Groups Versus Local Population: A Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Noah Khan; Muhammad U Ali; Lokesh Bhambani; Nagraj Prashanth; Samantha Tross
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.