| Literature DB >> 29726106 |
Kyle S Enger1, Jade Mitchell1, Bharathi Murali1, Dawn N Birdsell2, Paul Keim2, Patrick L Gurian3, David M Wagner2.
Abstract
Bacillus spores resist inactivation, but the extent of their persistence on common surfaces is unclear. This work addresses knowledge gaps regarding biothreat agents in the environment to reduce uncertainty in risk assessment models. Studies were conducted to investigate the long-term inactivation of Bacillus anthracis and three commonly used surrogate organisms - B. cereus, B. atrophaeus and B. thuringiensis on three materials: laminate countertop, stainless steel and polystyrene Petri dishes. Viable spores were measured at 1, 30, 90, 196, 304 and 1038 days. Twelve different persistence models were fit to the data using maximum likelihood estimation and compared. The study found that (1) spore inactivation was not log-linear, as commonly modelled; (2) B. thuringiensis counts increased at 24 h on all materials, followed by a subsequent decline; (3) several experiments showed evidence of a 'U' shape, with spore counts apparently decreasing and then increasing between 1 and 304 days; (4) spores on polystyrene showed little inactivation; and (5) the maximum inactivation of 56% was observed for B. atrophaeus spores on steel at 196 days. Over the range of surfaces, time durations and conditions (humidity controlled vs. uncontrolled) examined, B. thuringiensis most closely matched the behaviour of B. anthracis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29726106 PMCID: PMC6196380 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Persistence models
| Name | Equation | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Exponential |
| Chick ( |
| Logistic |
| Gonzalez ( |
| Fermi |
| Peleg ( |
| Weibull |
| Coroller |
| Gamma |
| R Core Team ( |
| Lognormal |
| Aragao |
| Juneja and Marks 1 (JM1) |
| Juneja |
| Juneja and Marks 2 (JM2) |
| Juneja |
| Gompertz (2 parameters) |
| Wu |
| Gompertz (3 parameters) |
| Gil |
| Broken‐line |
| Carrera |
|
| ||
| Slope changes at | ||
| Double exponential |
| Abraham |
N(0) denotes the number of organisms initially applied at time, t = 0. N(t) denotes the number of organisms remaining at time t. k 1, k 2, and k 3 denote parameters. They have different interpretations depending on the model.
Figure 1Best‐fit persistence models for the first five time points (0–304 days) shown in black. Models that were within 2 Bayesian Information Criterion units of the best‐fit model are shown in grey. Models for B. anthracis are shown in graphs A‐C; B. cereus in graphs D‐F; B. atrophaeus in graphs G‐I; and B. thuringiensis in graphs J‐L.
Figure 2Best‐fit persistence models for the complete datasets (0–1038 days) shown in black. Models that were within 2 Bayesian Information Criterion units of the best‐fit model are shown in grey. Models for B. anthracis are shown in graphs A‐C; B. cereus in graphs D‐F; B. atrophaeus in graphs G‐I; and B. thuringiensis in graphs J‐L.
Summary of best‐fit persistence models with their BIC values
| Time: 0–304 days | Time: 0–1038 days | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model | BIC | Model | BIC |
|
| |||
| JM1 | −1.3395 | Fermi | 47.518 |
| JM2 | −1.3559 | JM1 | 48.067 |
| Gz2 | −2.9085 | JM2 | 48.0588 |
| Lognormal | −1.3641 | Gz2 | 47.1561 |
| Gamma | −1.3277 | Weibull | 47.7211 |
| Double exponential | −2.8372 | Lognormal | 48.0322 |
| Gamma | 47.9527 | ||
| Gz3 | 48.8207 | ||
|
| |||
| JM2 | −11.916 | Fermi | −5.0897 |
| Broken‐line | −13.426 | JM1 | −5.0897 |
| JM2 | −5.0894 | ||
| Gz2 | −5.0897 | ||
| Weibull | −5.0852 | ||
| Lognormal | −5.0897 | ||
| Gamma | −5.0897 | ||
|
| |||
| JM1 | −6.4031 | Logistic | 28.8845 |
| JM2 | −6.5533 | Fermi | 27.7263 |
| Gz2 | −7.0459 | Gz3 | 29.4588 |
| Weibull | −6.4817 | ||
| Lognormal | −6.6006 | ||
| Gamma | −6.4031 | ||
| Double exponential | −6.2113 | ||
|
| |||
| JM1 | −12.093 | Gz3 | 0.54715 |
| JM2 | −12.194 | ||
| Lognormal | −12.149 | ||
| Gamma | −12.093 | ||
|
| |||
| Exponential | −12.905 | Fermi | 39.0248 |
| Logistic | −12.477 | JM1 | 39.7709 |
| JM1 | −11.621 | JM2 | 39.3491 |
| JM2 | −11.843 | Gz2 | 38.7348 |
| Gz2 | −12.949 | Weibull | 39.0375 |
| Weibull | −11.713 | Lognormal | 39.3461 |
| Lognormal | −12.159 | Gamma | 39.2586 |
| Gamma | −11.623 | ||
| Double exponential | −11.809 | ||
| Broken‐line | −11.81 | ||
|
| |||
| Double exponential | −5.6618 | Gz2 | 27.0329 |
| Broken‐line | −6.5832 | Broken‐line | 28.2564 |
| Gz3 | 26.5929 | ||
|
| |||
| Double exponential | 6.79885 | Fermi | 23.3633 |
| Broken‐line | 5.39782 | JM1 | 24.8108 |
| JM2 | 24.8102 | ||
| Gz2 | 24.2735 | ||
| Weibull | 24.8077 | ||
| Lognormal | 24.8125 | ||
| Gamma | 24.8109 | ||
|
| |||
| JM2 | 6.76612 | Fermi | 16.6206 |
| Double exponential | 7.57132 | JM1 | 17.4876 |
| Broken‐line | 7.57132 | JM2 | 17.4876 |
| Gz2 | 17.4639 | ||
| Weibull | 17.4894 | ||
| Lognormal | 17.4876 | ||
| Gamma | 17.4876 | ||
|
| |||
| Gz2 | 14.0205 | Exponential | 21.5841 |
| Double exponential | 13.4365 | Logistic | 20.967 |
| Broken‐line | 13.0432 | Fermi | 21.9064 |
| Gz3 | 14.9432 | ||
|
| |||
| Exponential | −8.4881 | Fermi | 48.1996 |
| JM1 | −8.7407 | JM1 | 48.8759 |
| JM2 | −9.4054 | JM2 | 48.9927 |
| Gz2 | −9.7387 | Gz2 | 47.722 |
| Weibull | −9.0137 | Weibull | 48.1498 |
| Lognormal | −10.085 | Lognormal | 48.7965 |
| Gamma | −8.7494 | Gamma | 48.5202 |
|
| |||
| Gz3 | −11.968 | Fermi | 20.1394 |
| JM1 | 20.0382 | ||
| JM2 | 20.0375 | ||
| Gz2 | 20.1024 | ||
| Weibull | 20.0772 | ||
| Lognormal | 20.038 | ||
| Gamma | 20.0371 | ||
|
| |||
| Gz2 | 3.22912 | Fermi | 18.5219 |
| Double exponential | 5.1404 | Gz2 | 17.6264 |
| Broken‐line | 5.09245 | Weibull | 19.3753 |
| Broken‐line | 19.6094 | ||
All models shown have BIC values with two units of the lowest BIC value.
a.Lowest Bayesian information criterion (BIC).
Summary of best‐fit models and their optimized parameters (95% confidence interval)
| Time: 0–304 days | Time: 0–1038 days | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model |
|
|
| Model |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Gz2 | 3.67E‐01 (2.07E‐01, 5.28E‐01) | −9.17E‐01 (−1.11E+00, −7.27E‐01) | NA | Gz2 | 9.16E‐04 (−6.75E‐02, 6.93E‐02) | 3.37E‐03 (−2.81E‐02, 3.49E‐02) | NA |
|
| |||||||
| Broken‐line | 1.84E‐01 (−7.61E‐01, 1.13E+00) | 1.85E‐01 (−7.61E‐01, 1.13E+00) | 9.54E‐01 (−4.18E+00, 6.09E+00) | Lognormal | 6.73E+00 (5.97E+00, 7.50E+00) | 1.44E‐01 (−3.74E‐01, 6.62E‐01) | NA |
|
| |||||||
| Gz2 | 2.34E‐01 (8.21E‐02, 3.86E‐01) | −6.13E‐01 (−7.92E‐01, −4.35E‐01) | NA | Fermi | 5.17E‐03 (−2.17E‐01, 2.27E‐01) | 3.50E+02 (3.49E+02, 3.50E+02) | NA |
|
| |||||||
| JM2 | 1.41E+00 (−1.99E+00, −8.39E‐01) | 2.55E‐01 (1.38E‐01, 3.73E‐01) | NA | Gz3 | −1.93E+04 (−4.27E+04, 3.99E+03) | 2.53E+00 (1.45E+00, 3.61E+00) | 4.18E+03 (4.18E+03, 4.18E+03) |
|
| |||||||
| Gz2 | 2.71E‐03 (−6.57E‐02, 7.11E‐02) | −1.05E‐02 (−1.23E‐01, 1.02E‐01) | NA | Gz2 | 5.06E‐04 (−6.01E‐02, 6.12E‐02) | 4.05E‐03 (−2.08E‐02, 2.89E‐02) | NA |
|
| |||||||
| Broken‐line | 6.65E‐03 (5.03E‐03, 8.26E‐03) | 8.51E‐03 (5.93E‐03, 1.11E‐02) | 1.19E+02 (1.19E+02, 1.20E+02) | Gz3 | −4.44E+03 (−1.20E+04, 3.15E+03) | 6.80E‐01 (−8.29E‐01, 2.19E+00) | 3.32E+03 (3.32E+03, 3.32E+03) |
|
| |||||||
| Broken‐line | 7.42E‐03 (−1.95E‐04, 1.50E‐02) | 1.02E‐02 (2.40E‐03, 1.79E‐02) | 7.57E+01 (7.49E+01, 7.66E+01) | Fermi | 5.30E‐03 (−3.87E‐01, 3.98E‐01) | 5.31E+02 (5.30E+02, 5.31E+02) | NA |
|
| |||||||
| JM2 | −6.77E‐01 (−1.43E+00, 7.48E‐02) | −2.93E‐01 (−5.64E‐01, −2.16E‐02) | NA | Fermi | 5.17E‐03 (−4.78E‐01, 4.89E‐01) | 6.14E+02 (6.14E+02, 6.14E+02) | NA |
|
| |||||||
| Broken‐line | 5.86E‐03 (2.75E‐03, 8.96E‐03) | 8.82E‐03 (3.87E‐03, 1.38E‐02) | 1.34E+02 (1.33E+02, 1.34E+02) | Logistic | 3.13E‐03 (2.72E‐03, 3.55E‐03) | NA | NA |
|
| |||||||
| Lognormal | 6.14E+00 (5.59E+00, 6.68E+00) | 2.45E+00 (1.36E+00, 3.54E+00) | NA | Gz2 | 1.36E‐03 (−5.92E‐02, 6.19E‐02) | 2.91E‐03 (−2.81E‐02, 3.39E‐02) | NA |
|
| |||||||
| Gz3 | 8.75E‐01 (−3.57E+02, 3.58E+02) | 1.01E‐02 (−2.46E+02, 2.46E+02) | 1.69E+01 (−2.97E+02, 3.31E+02) | Gamma | 6.78E+01 (6.74E+01, 6.81E+01) | 8.26E+00 (−5.70E+00, 2.22E+01) | NA |
|
| |||||||
| Gz2 | 8.76E‐03 (−8.41E‐02, 1.02E‐01) | −2.46E‐02 (−1.45E‐01, 9.59E‐02) | NA | Gz2 | 1.04E‐03 (−3.98E‐02, 4.19E‐02) | 2.33E‐03 (−2.55E‐02, 3.02E‐02) | NA |
Summary of statistical test results regarding ‘U’‐shaped curve
| Species | Fomite | Test for ‘U’ shape | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uncorrected | Corrected | ||
|
| Laminate | 0.304 | 0.920 |
|
| Polystyrene |
|
|
|
| Steel | 0.003 | 0.031 |
|
| Laminate | 0.088 | 0.494 |
|
| Polystyrene | 0.075 | 0.494 |
|
| Steel | 0.005 | 0.054 |
|
| Laminate | 0.071 | 0.494 |
|
| Polystyrene | 0.365 | 0.920 |
|
| Steel | 0.030 | 0.238 |
|
| Laminate | 0.230 | 0.920 |
|
| Polystyrene | 0.375 | 0.920 |
|
| Steel | 0.014 | 0.122 |
P‐values were corrected for multiple comparisons using Holm's method in the p.adjust() function in R 2.15.
a.Excluding the data collected at 1038 days.
* P‐value between 0.1 and 0.05.
** P‐value < 0.05.
*** P‐value not defined; this data set showed an apparent increase in spores from 1 to 304 days.